Adil Najam
As reader zamanov has reminded us elsewhere, today marks Dr. Abdus Salam’s 10th death anniversary.
It should be a moment of deep reflection for all of us. He would have been as great a man as he was even if he did not won the Nobel Award in physics. But we would have conveniently forgotten him. That he did win the Nobel Award is a source of cosmetic and hollow pride for many Pakistanis. Cosmetic and hollow because it is also a source of visible unease. Even when we acknowledge that he was a great scientist (after all, the Nobel Committee thought so), we are uncomfortable acknowledging that he was a great man whose significance goes beyond his science.



As a brutally honest editorial in today’s Daily Times points out, “we are scared of honoring Dr. Salam.” We must not be.
The Daily Times editorial says all that needs to be said; it is worth reading, worth thinking about, and worth quoting in full:
The tragedy of our treatment of Dr Abdus Salam
Dr Abdus Salam (1926-1996) died ten years ago. He was the first Pakistani to get a Nobel Prize in 1979. But he might be the last if we continue to allow our state to evolve in a way that frightens the rest of the world. Our collective psyche runs more to accepted ‘wisdom’ than to scientific inquiry; and even if we were to display an uncharacteristic outcropping of individual genius the world may be so frightened of it that it might not give us our deserts.
We are scared of honouring Dr Salam because of our constitution which we have amended to declare his community as ‘non-Muslim’. When Dr Salam died in 1996 he had to be buried in Pakistan because he refused to give up his Pakistani nationality and acquire another that respected him more. But the Pakistani state was afraid of touching his dead body. He was therefore buried in Rabwa, the home town of his Ahmedi community whose name is also unacceptable to us and has been changed to Chenab Nagar by a state proclamation. But that was not the end of the story. After he was buried, the pious, law-abiding and constitution-loving people of Jhang, which is nearby, went over to Chenab Nagar to see if all had been done according to the constitutional provisions regarding the Ahmedi community to which he belonged.
And what did the constitution say? It said that the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or use any of the symbols of Islam. The original amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A Bhutto, a ‘liberal socialist-democrat’, and subsequent tightening of the law was done by the great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the civilians and the khakis had connived in the great betrayal of Dr Salam.
After the great scientist was buried in Chenab Nagar, his tombstone said “Abdus Salam the First Muslim Nobel Laureate”. Needless to say, the police arrived with a magistrate and rubbed off the ‘Muslim’ part of the katba. Now the tombstone says: Abdus Salam the First Nobel Laureate. The magistrate remained unfazed by what he had done but Dr Salam’s grave is actually the tombstone of a Muslim culture that Pakistan had inherited from the founder of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. But ironies fly thick in Pakistan. In Jhang, for example, where Dr Salam grew up as a precocious child, the schools that he endowed with scholarships and grants now teach communal hatred rather than the love that he had in mind when he gave them his money.
Meanwhile, the Ahmedi community is under daily pressure and anyone with a twisted mind is free to persecute them.
Abdus Salam was born in Jhang in 1926. At the age of 14, he got the highest marks ever recorded for the Matriculation Examination in Punjab. The whole town turned out to welcome him. He won a scholarship to Government College, Lahore, and took his MA in 1946. In the same year he was awarded a scholarship to St. John’s College, Cambridge, where he took a BA (honours) with a double First in mathematics and physics in 1949. In 1950 he received the Smith’s Prize from Cambridge University for the most outstanding pre-doctoral contribution to physics. He also obtained a PhD in theoretical physics at Cambridge; his thesis, published in 1951, contained fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics which had already gained him an international reputation.
In 1954 Dr Salam left his native country for a lectureship at Cambridge University. Before the Pakistani politicians apostatised him, he was a member of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, a member of the Scientific Commission of Pakistan and Chief Scientific Adviser to the President from 1961 to 1974. Pakistan’s space research agency Suparco was created by him and it is only symbolic that a group of Shia workers of Suparco were put to death in Karachi in 2004 by sectarian terrorists. Like Dr Salam, a lot of gifted Shia doctors have had to leave Pakistan because of the state’s twisted policies.
Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for General Zia who had “supplemented” the Second Amendment to the constitution with further comic disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to welcome the great scientist and had to be seen with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his government was already bristling, he took care to clip those sections of Dr Salam’s speech where he had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic expression. It was Dr Salam’s good luck that one of the believers did not go to court under Zia’s own laws to get the country’s only Nobel laureate sent to prison for six months of rigorous imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where he was received with great fanfare. He had gone there to simply meet his primary school mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and put it around the neck of his teacher.
Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago lest the government come under pressure to remove it from circulation. It is also true that his alma mater, Government College Lahore, now a university, has named certain ancillary departments and academic sessions after him following a long period of obscurantist domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty about what it has done to the greatest scientist it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the label of “rogue state” to Pakistan by selling the country’s nuclear technology for personal gain. Can we redeem ourselves by doing something in Dr Salam’s memory on this 10th anniversary of his passing that would please his soul and cleanse ours?

And what did the constitution say? It said that the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or use any of the symbols of Islam. The original amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A Bhutto, a ‘liberal socialist-democrat’, and subsequent tightening of the law was done by the great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the civilians and the khakis had connived in the great betrayal of Dr Salam.
Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for General Zia who had “supplemented” the Second Amendment to the constitution with further comic disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to welcome the great scientist and had to be seen with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his government was already bristling, he took care to clip those sections of Dr Salam’s speech where he had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic expression. It was Dr Salam’s good luck that one of the believers did not go to court under Zia’s own laws to get the country’s only Nobel laureate sent to prison for six months of rigorous imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where he was received with great fanfare. He had gone there to simply meet his primary school mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and put it around the neck of his teacher.
Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago lest the government come under pressure to remove it from circulation. It is also true that his alma mater, Government College Lahore, now a university, has named certain ancillary departments and academic sessions after him following a long period of obscurantist domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty about what it has done to the greatest scientist it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the label of “rogue state” to Pakistan by selling the country’s nuclear technology for 


























Adil
I was thinking, can we not take posts like this and use the pertinent info from comments as well to create online ‘ATP Booklets’ on these personalities? May be we can take it further to places, things etc.?
Regards
As the discussion should be directed only to honour Dr. Abdus Salam & to understand what wrong the nation has done in all this context, but it deviate little from the topic, but its natural atleast regarding the nation like ours.
[quote post=”431″]Would any one please give me the definition of term “Muslimâ€Â?, so that I can verify my “Islamâ€Â? ????? [/quote]
Well, since having a little connection with her, I think I must reply.
Let see what Holy Prophet gives us direction in this context. According to “Bukhari” & “Muslim”, definition of “Muslim” is as;
“Any one who consider himself a muslim is a muslim for Holy Prophet (PBUH)” .
occasion was, when in Madina, prophet (PBUH)instructed his Holy companions (R.A)to count no. of muslims (to make census), he stated them to count those who call themselves muslim, as these are muslim for me.
At another occasion, Holy Prophet (PBUH)stated that any one who pray like us & take our “zabeeha” is a muslim.
Once, Hazrat Usama (R.A) killed his opponent in a fight & just before the opponent uttered “La ila ha illallah…..” When Holy Prophet (PBUH)get informed about this incident, he showed his angerness to Hazrat Usama (R.A). Hazrat Usama (R.A) argued that his opponent has stated “La ila ha illallah…..” just not to be killed, But Holy Prophet (PBUH) has stated, “Has you seen inside his heart”.
I think these are enough indications to understand the term “Muslim”. So, no one has a right to announce any one non-muslim, if that person call himself a muslim. If some one involve in such deed of “Kufar sazi”, he must prepare himself to face the questions of Almighty Allah. If there are any controversial issues among different school of thoughts, be tolerant & allow each other to express their arguments without fear, so that we check where the problem arises?
Being the student of M.Phil Physics in Quaid-e-Azam university, Islamabad; i “worship” the glories of Dr. Abdus Salam, with all my faith & belief. I have with me the autobiography of Dr. Abus Salam that time. I will try to get enough time to reveal new dimensions of his life.
Muslim means ‘Obedient’.
Would any one please give me the definition of term “Muslim”, so that I can verify my “Islam” ?????
Thankyu TRUEFACTS for highlighting the TRUE FACTS:
[quote] In Pakistan minorities are not facing any real problem[/quote]
You are exactly right. Just because we sometimes burn their churches, or sometimes kill them under blasphemy laws, or don’t treat them as equal citizens, of course that does not mean they are facing any REAL problems. Just like the Quaid i Azam is not a REAL freedom fighter. You are exactly right. Why doesn’t anyone else understand? They should be honored that REAL muslims are treating them this way, its an honor for them!
MU ! Two Nation Theory is time tested golden concept. In Pakistan minorities are not facing any real problem as in India Muslims are still facing the real life example is massacre in Gujrat.
A deviation from seperate electoral system is the deviation from Pakistan Ideology.
[quote comment=”34270″]On the ideological base I am against the joint electoral list also, because it is against the basic concept of Pakistan movement & two nation ideology.
[/quote]
Then why not give everyone who you consider part of the “otherâ€Â? nation their own home? Isn’t this what two nation theory is all about? Isn’t that why Muslims wanted a new home because they were being discriminated against and not being treated equally in undivided India? The same thing is now happening in Pakistan. So yes, if you still believe in two nation theory, let’s bring it to its natural conclusion.
Why it’s necessary to build tombs just like Muslim culture. In our locality Ahmadies have place to worship & they are facing no problem.
On the ideological base I am against the joint electoral list also, because it is against the basic concept of Pakistan movement & two nation ideology
If some one is not agree with ur any post,then it doesn’t mean that u r bad person or intolerable. What u thinks & say its ur right, what others are saying & thinking is their right.We should use decent language & show positive attitude. We should be careful about selection of words, which reflects our personality.