Custom Search

Forgotten: Sir Zafrullah Khan (1893-1985)

Posted on February 12, 2007
Filed Under >Yasser Latif Hamdani, History, People, Politics, Religion
249 Comments
Total Views: 100555

Share

By Yasser Latif Hamdani

Last week (February 6) marked the 114th Birthday of one of Pakistan’s greatest unsung heroes. Once again, there was no mention of commemoration of his remarkable like. No sense of gratitude from a nation for which he did so much. He has been wiped out of our memory because he was an Ahmadi, despite his glorious contributions to Pakistan and its cause (see related post on Dr. Abdul Salam).

Sir Zafrullah Khan’s services rendered to Muslims of India, Pakistan and the Third World are second only to that of Quaid-e-Azam Mahomed Ali Jinnah. As a jurist, a diplomat and a patriot he stood head and shoulders above the lesser men who have made a mockery of our republic.

Born in 1893 in Sialkot in what was to become one of the earliest Ahmaddiya households, this small town boy rose to be one of the shrewdest legal minds of his time. His early education was in Sialkot, after which he proceeded to Lahore for his bachelors degree, under the tutelage of none other than the great Iqbal himself. He got his law degree from King’s College London in 1914, where he stood top of his class and was the first person from the Indian subcontinent to do so. He was, like most great figures of that time, called to bar at Lincoln’s Inn.



As a practicing lawyer, he soon proved his mettle and had many reported cases to his name. The first major politician to recognize Zafrullah’s talents was Sir Fazli Hussain, the founder of Unionist Party of Punjab. Starting his career in his early 30s as a member of the Punjab legislative Council, he rose to prominence as an indefatigable crusader for Muslims of Punjab. Later he represented the Muslims at round table conference and crossed swords with figures like Jinnah and Gandhi. In 1931, he became the Muslim League president and at the roundtable conference, he cornered no less a person than Churchill in a committee hearing who was forced to accept Zafrullah’s point of view.

Later he was offered a seat on Viceroy’s permanent Council, which he took to further his cause. He also served at varying times as the minister of Railways, Public works, labour and law under the Viceroy. For a brief period, he also became British India’s representative to the League of Nations, just before it was dissolved.




Your Ad Here

However his greatest contribution came when he drafted the famous Lahore Resolution, which till this day is the rallying point of Pakistan and Pakistani nationalism. He had been tasked with finding a common point between the popular demand for “Pakistan” and Muslim League’s all India requirements. The Lahore resolution was a broad based solution which left the door virtually open for several solutions and negotiation on the issue of partition. In essence it envisaged 2 or 3 great republics for the Muslim peoples and it was this document which forms the basis not just of Pakistan but also of Bangladesh. For this he got a lot of slack. No less a person than Khan Abdul Wali Khan highlighted Zafrullah’s religious belief to play on the popular conspiracy theory that holds Ahmadis to be British touts.

Later from 1942 onwards, he served as a federal judge (equivalent of an Supreme court C judge) of India and finally took leave on the eve of Pakistan to serve the cause of Pakistan before the Radcliffe Commission, on Jinnah’s personal request. On 25th December 1947, Jinnah appointed him the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. At the UN, Sir Zafrullah emerged as the most eloquent advocate of all third world and Islamic issues. It was Zafrullah whose efforts materialized into the UN Resolutions on Kashmir, which are the basis of the Pakistani case and grievance. Later he became the first Asian president of the International Court of Justice, a singular and unique honor for any Pakistani. He also served, briefly, as the President of the UN General Assembly. He passed away in September of 1983 in Lahore.

A prolific author on the history of Pakistan and Islam, his most famous book was titled “Agony of Pakistan” in which he makes plain the great betrayal which wrested the country from the hands of its patriots into the hands of those who were its greatest enemies. Ironically, today Jinnah’s most trusted lieutenant is not even remembered by the state which owes him so much, including its own founding document. It is the memory of people like Zafrullah Khan that will keep alive the original idea of Pakistan and there is no doubt that one day the posterity will reclaim its true destiny as a progressive and modern republic.

Yasser Latif Hamdani is a lawyer in Lahore and a researcher of the history of the Pakistan Movement.

249 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 3229 28 27 26 25 [24] 23 22 21 20 191 » Show All

  1. MZ Khan says:
    July 25th, 2007 6:11 pm

    From: Who is a Muslim? —Ishtiaq Ahmed

    The most ironical part of the Pakistan story is that the sects which played an important role in popularising the idea of Pakistan are being persecuted today. The advent of the Muslim separatist movement begins with the 1906 address by the Aga Khan on behalf of notable Muslims to Viceroy Lord Minto, requesting separate electorates. The Aga Khan enjoyed the patronage of British colonial power that helped him obtain several concessions for the Muslim community including separate electorates. The connection of the Ahmadiyya community with the idea of Pakistan dates from the time of Viceroy Lord Linlithgow, who a few days before the March 23, 1940 Lahore resolution, used the good offices of Sir Zafrulla Khan to inform the Muslim League that the British government would consider it appropriate if it were to demand a separate Muslim state(s).

    The Viceroy wanted to pressure the Congress Party which refused to cooperate in the war effort. Thereafter the Ahmadiyya were not involved in Muslim League politics. They became wary of the idea of Pakistan when the Muslim League mobilised mainstream ulema to propagate the idea of an Islamic state during the 1945-46 provincial election campaign. However, Quaid-e-Azam won over Sir Zafrulla to the cause of Pakistan by assuring him that such a state would be non-sectarian. Thenceforth the Ahmadiyya sect invested all its effort in supporting the demand for Pakistan.

    Any serious study of the proceedings of the Punjab Boundary Commission would show that of all the briefs presented before the Commission — including those prepared by the Indian National Congress, the All-India Muslim League, the Sikhs, Christians, Ahmadis and others — the one that Sir Zafrulla put forth on behalf of the Muslim League was the most powerful. So much so that the counsel for the Indian National Congress, Mr Setalvad, complimented Sir Zafrulla for preparing such a strong case for Pakistan.

    http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_15-3-2005_pg3_2

  2. mazhar butt says:
    July 25th, 2007 2:21 pm

    I already stated there is no question about the capabilities of Zafarullah Khan. The only argument about him is that he was a renegade of the general muslim Ummah. After Ahmedis being termed non-muslims by the State there should now be no argument about it unless the Ahmadis or the State are subjected to change !

  3. MZ Khan says:
    July 25th, 2007 2:07 pm

    The Process and Impact of Ideologization of Islam in Pakistan – Maleeha Aslam

    Unsure about what was an “Islamic State

  4. July 25th, 2007 2:03 pm


    TUM KAISE QALANDER HO AUR KAISI YE MASTI HE
    TOOFAN MIEN GHIRI DUNYA HE SAHIL PE TERI KASHTI HE

    Wah wah!

    Kahin yeh wohi Masti tu nahi jis k ‘Mastanay Hazaroun hain’ ? :-)

  5. MZ Khan says:
    July 25th, 2007 1:45 pm

    Khawaja Hassan Nizami in his Urdu letter of March 6, 1948:

    The fact of the matter is that Chaudhry Zafarullah Khan has done a job for which 80 crore Muslims of the World owe him a debt of gratitude. I never hesitate to mention this fact to all, the intelligentsia and the common people alike. Even in my speeches at big public gatherings. I freely express this view.

  6. mazhar butt says:
    July 25th, 2007 8:36 am

    MQ
    here again,,,,,,,,,

    ”>>>>

    Not a sound reason to judge the personality of a person. There are thousands in Pakistan who still brag about their “”nana’s having podeeney ke baag in India”,,,,,,,MQ, I didn’t expect such a shallow personality evaluation from you..

    I respect Cowasjee not for his ”riches” or ”rich background” but for his individuality as an honest, bold and straightforward person.

    Read Iqbal’s ‘shikwa’ and ”jawab-e’shikwa” for more enlightenment on what we are and what our ”aslaaf”were and why it’ s wrong to brag about our ancestors !

    TUM KAISE QALANDER HO AUR KAISI YE MASTI HE
    TOOFAN MIEN GHIRI DUNYA HE SAHIL PE TERI KASHTI HE

  7. mazhar butt says:
    July 25th, 2007 8:16 am

    MQ,,,I don’t mind Cowasjee’s commenting. I only wished to tell the forum that minorities are enjoying equal rights with the local Muslims here in Pakistan (except h/ever for Constitutional limitations which are mandatory)
    and did I say wrong: AAJKAL TO BHANGI AUR MUSSALMAN BHI AIK HI TASHTARI MIEN KHANA KHATEY HIEN !

  8. MZ Khan says:
    July 25th, 2007 6:32 am

    Oh, how much I wish I was from Karachi too so my irrelevant to the post comments could stay here too…oh one can only wish…

Comment Pages: « 3229 28 27 26 25 [24] 23 22 21 20 191 » Show All



Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!