<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Media Factor	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/</link>
	<description>Pakistan. Pakistani. Pakistaniat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Zia Hashmi		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/comment-page-5/#comment-159043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia Hashmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/#comment-159043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great, Raza. This is really a good meaning piece!. I enjoyed a lot reading it. I agree much of what appears in our media is hardly inspiring. Best way would be to introduce specialized coverage by trained, experienced and techniclly well informed column writers/reporters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, Raza. This is really a good meaning piece!. I enjoyed a lot reading it. I agree much of what appears in our media is hardly inspiring. Best way would be to introduce specialized coverage by trained, experienced and techniclly well informed column writers/reporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: observer		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/comment-page-5/#comment-154343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[observer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/#comment-154343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This post is a good read, Raza.  Although, I am not sure I agree entirely with your sentiments.  Unfortunately, I cannot comment much on the Urdu press and so you may well be right about that.  WRT the English press however, my suggestion to you would be:  switch to The News.  It may have some of what you are saying, but a lot less than Dawn.  Dawn oped&#039;s are too painful to read--it&#039;s partially the editors--I have had personal experience with them cutting out half of what I have written such that the article is unrecognizable!  The editors there seem to think their job is to make each article look the same stylistically and have a near-obsession with summarizing--even if it means changing facts around!  The News, on the other hand, does give space to a lot of different people--and though we do have our share of former ambassadors, they do not dominate.  Dawn, I have to say again, is terribly stale--only octogenarian voices--Cowasjee is about the best they can do and even he is only good about a quarter of the time--no more.

You know what would make an interesting piece--is a review of some of the TV personalities.  I am nearly dying to recount my take on Shahid Masood, for instance...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is a good read, Raza.  Although, I am not sure I agree entirely with your sentiments.  Unfortunately, I cannot comment much on the Urdu press and so you may well be right about that.  WRT the English press however, my suggestion to you would be:  switch to The News.  It may have some of what you are saying, but a lot less than Dawn.  Dawn oped&#8217;s are too painful to read&#8211;it&#8217;s partially the editors&#8211;I have had personal experience with them cutting out half of what I have written such that the article is unrecognizable!  The editors there seem to think their job is to make each article look the same stylistically and have a near-obsession with summarizing&#8211;even if it means changing facts around!  The News, on the other hand, does give space to a lot of different people&#8211;and though we do have our share of former ambassadors, they do not dominate.  Dawn, I have to say again, is terribly stale&#8211;only octogenarian voices&#8211;Cowasjee is about the best they can do and even he is only good about a quarter of the time&#8211;no more.</p>
<p>You know what would make an interesting piece&#8211;is a review of some of the TV personalities.  I am nearly dying to recount my take on Shahid Masood, for instance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ahmad R. Shahid		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/comment-page-5/#comment-154249</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ahmad R. Shahid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/2008/04/07/the-media-factor/#comment-154249</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well who is telling the truth and who is lying depends on which side of the fence are you on. A retired PAF officer was much against Nusrat Javed, when he would write for The News, since he thought he was a sold out. Simple reason: Nusrat Javed didn&#039;t subscribe to the views of the military.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well who is telling the truth and who is lying depends on which side of the fence are you on. A retired PAF officer was much against Nusrat Javed, when he would write for The News, since he thought he was a sold out. Simple reason: Nusrat Javed didn&#8217;t subscribe to the views of the military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
