<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ATP Poll Results: Who Did The Most Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistaniat.com/2009/07/29/pakistan-leaders-popularity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/07/29/pakistan-leaders-popularity/</link>
	<description>Pakistan. Pakistani. Pakistaniat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: usman</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/07/29/pakistan-leaders-popularity/comment-page-4/#comment-212716</link>
		<dc:creator>usman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=8383#comment-212716</guid>
		<description>impressive results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>impressive results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usman</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/07/29/pakistan-leaders-popularity/comment-page-4/#comment-190069</link>
		<dc:creator>Usman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=8383#comment-190069</guid>
		<description>@Yasir; 
1. The 160 Million people do not have internet access and actually majority do not even take part in voting.
2. Few million intenret users have more interest in social networking sites then taking ineterest in political situation of the country.

I think this poll does reflect people&#039;s likes, most of the people who visit this site are educated, have interest in Pakistan Policitics and therefore would have better understanding then a farmer.

If there is voting for &#039;Who did worse&#039;, Nawaz, Bhutto and Ayub will get the most votes. Just see what a mess the current democratic gov has got judiciary into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yasir;<br />
1. The 160 Million people do not have internet access and actually majority do not even take part in voting.<br />
2. Few million intenret users have more interest in social networking sites then taking ineterest in political situation of the country.</p>
<p>I think this poll does reflect people&#8217;s likes, most of the people who visit this site are educated, have interest in Pakistan Policitics and therefore would have better understanding then a farmer.</p>
<p>If there is voting for &#8216;Who did worse&#8217;, Nawaz, Bhutto and Ayub will get the most votes. Just see what a mess the current democratic gov has got judiciary into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aqil</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/07/29/pakistan-leaders-popularity/comment-page-4/#comment-189948</link>
		<dc:creator>Aqil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=8383#comment-189948</guid>
		<description>I can understand the votes going to ZAB, Ayub and Mush, but it&#039;s hard to understand why BB got so many votes. Also, I find it surprising that Ayub got so few votes.

I think propaganda and emotions are clearly playing a role here. Also, I wonder how many of the voters have really voted specifically on the basis of who did the most good, while ignoring the bad side as the question stated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the votes going to ZAB, Ayub and Mush, but it&#8217;s hard to understand why BB got so many votes. Also, I find it surprising that Ayub got so few votes.</p>
<p>I think propaganda and emotions are clearly playing a role here. Also, I wonder how many of the voters have really voted specifically on the basis of who did the most good, while ignoring the bad side as the question stated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

