<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Doosra Iqbal: A Revisitation	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pakistaniat.com/2009/12/16/allama-iqbal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/12/16/allama-iqbal/</link>
	<description>Pakistan. Pakistani. Pakistaniat.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PMA		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/12/16/allama-iqbal/comment-page-4/#comment-195197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PMA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=10733#comment-195197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[wk says: (December 16th, 2009 4:34 pm):

&quot;his views are not liberal at all.&quot;

Iqbal is &#039;conservative&#039; in the sense that he is pro-religion. But within the religion-framework his views are liberal. He is not dogmatic at all. He sees religion, in its third stage, as a liberating force. Liberals who like him misunderstand him as a liberal and Conservatives misuse him as conservative......and Liberals-Secularists confuse him as &#039;conservative jihadist&#039;. But the fact is that Iqbal can not be boxed-in under simple and convenient labels. In order to understand Iqbal one must read his major works (written in four languages) and not just his few popular Urdu poems. It is a hard task and that is why most of us misunderstand the man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wk says: (December 16th, 2009 4:34 pm):</p>
<p>&#8220;his views are not liberal at all.&#8221;</p>
<p>Iqbal is &#8216;conservative&#8217; in the sense that he is pro-religion. But within the religion-framework his views are liberal. He is not dogmatic at all. He sees religion, in its third stage, as a liberating force. Liberals who like him misunderstand him as a liberal and Conservatives misuse him as conservative&#8230;&#8230;and Liberals-Secularists confuse him as &#8216;conservative jihadist&#8217;. But the fact is that Iqbal can not be boxed-in under simple and convenient labels. In order to understand Iqbal one must read his major works (written in four languages) and not just his few popular Urdu poems. It is a hard task and that is why most of us misunderstand the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Watan Aziz		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/12/16/allama-iqbal/comment-page-4/#comment-195021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watan Aziz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=10733#comment-195021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;This was done on purpose in this case. We know that many of ATP’s readers although speak and understand Urdu perfectly, find it difficult to read.&lt;/i&gt;

Then it begs the question, &quot;Was it worth it to create Urdu riots?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This was done on purpose in this case. We know that many of ATP’s readers although speak and understand Urdu perfectly, find it difficult to read.</i></p>
<p>Then it begs the question, &#8220;Was it worth it to create Urdu riots?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deeda-e-Beena		</title>
		<link>http://pakistaniat.com/2009/12/16/allama-iqbal/comment-page-4/#comment-195017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deeda-e-Beena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pakistaniat.com/?p=10733#comment-195017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The response so far to this Post and the quality of Comments is both inspiring and humbling. 

My hope is that the core message will continue to resonate, particularly with our younger readers.

A comment was made that the Ashaar quoted would be more appropriate in Urdu Text. 
I whole heartedly agree. 
This was done on purpose in this case. We  know that many of ATP&#039;s readers although speak and understand Urdu perfectly, find it difficult to read. I understand that Jinnah himself read his Urdu speeches from Romanised Text. 

Recently I have come across a website which is a goldmine of Books in Urdu that could be read online. Over 700 volumes spread over close to 400,000 pages are included.

 The site is: www.iqbalcyberlibrary.net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The response so far to this Post and the quality of Comments is both inspiring and humbling. </p>
<p>My hope is that the core message will continue to resonate, particularly with our younger readers.</p>
<p>A comment was made that the Ashaar quoted would be more appropriate in Urdu Text.<br />
I whole heartedly agree.<br />
This was done on purpose in this case. We  know that many of ATP&#8217;s readers although speak and understand Urdu perfectly, find it difficult to read. I understand that Jinnah himself read his Urdu speeches from Romanised Text. </p>
<p>Recently I have come across a website which is a goldmine of Books in Urdu that could be read online. Over 700 volumes spread over close to 400,000 pages are included.</p>
<p> The site is: <a href="http://www.iqbalcyberlibrary.net" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.iqbalcyberlibrary.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
