Comments on: ATP Poll: NRO Null and Void. Now What?

By: Eraj Danish

Eraj Danish — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:57:46 +0000

@obaid. I cudnt agree to you more. We need CLAIM OF JUSTICE. About time someone leads us to the RIGHT PATH! I am sick of seeing dead bodies everyday who are innocent. The killers of x-PM or hundreds roam around free and no one is to question them.

By: Obaid

Obaid — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:21:13 +0000

The result of all this drama is that everyone except PPP now has NRO.

Iftikhar Ch and other judges have NRO from signing the PCO valid and taking oath on PCO. Iftikhar Ch has NRO from corruption in regards to his son’s promotion. Nawaz Sharif and Co has NRO from attack on Supreme Court (treason), conspiring against sitting government with army generals (treason) and all the corruption (tax evasion, money laundering, making money through import/export fraud and so on). Army generals have NRO form conspiracy against sitting government and all corruption/commissions. Mullahs have NRO form giving the usurper Musharaf legitimacy through 17 amendment (effectively sharing in Musharaf’s treason) and then getting monetary gains through participating in government with the usurper Musharaf (illegal monetary gains).

Still there is claim of justice been done?

By: Syed Imran Zaidi

Syed Imran Zaidi — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:57:30 +0000

I agree with the majority in regards to poll. However 99% of the cases were establish during November 1990 and April 1993 and then again between Feb 1997 – Oct 1999, in sheer hate of certain political leaders and he acknowledge this all that cases were baseless and were created due to of political reasons while he was in exile in London and Musharaf was the president of Pakistan. The interesting part is that there is only one case got a final judgment in Pakistan and was over turned later as proofed that Judge was leaning to one side.
Now coming to this verdict from SC again seems were political. It seems like SC used all there power go against one person and one political party. My question to Mr Chief Justice is that if he is so sincere to country and public then there are many other cases where he can take action but he is tight lipped WHY?