Comments on: Justice Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim on the Judicial Crisis

By: binance register

binance register — Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:03:10 +0000

I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.

By: readinglord

readinglord — Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:46:33 +0000

I wonder why people have forgotten the case of Mukhtaran Mai which was taken up by CJ suo motu when it was already being bungled up by high judiciary and let it remain in limbo for about six years causing prolongation of incarceration of the accused Mastoies despite the fact they had been acquitted by the LHC.

By: Watan Aziz

Watan Aziz — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:11:22 +0000

In the “judges’ case,” the Supreme Court elaborated key principles for judicial appointment. The court ruled that the words “after consultation” meant that “the consultation should be effective, meaningful, purposive, consensus oriented, leaving no room for complaint of arbitrariness” and that the “opinion of the Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Chief Justice of a High Court as to the fitness and suitability of a candidate for judgeship is entitled to be accepted in the absence of very sound reasons to be recorded by the President.”

I do not have full text of the Trust case decision, but the above is a quote, apparently, from the same.