Independence Day Greetings for India

Posted on August 15, 2006
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Foreign Relations, History, People, Photo of the Day
Total Views: 43886

Adil Najam

Today is August 15.
India’s Independence Day

ATP sends all Indians sincere and heartfelt Independence Day greetings and the very best wishes.

On this day I want to share with you some thoughts, and also these two pictures (below) of the Quaid-i-Azam and Gandhi ji together. These are amongst my all-time favorite pictures of two people for each of whom I have the utmost respect. (I know, some of you are surprised. Read on… and, also, the ‘you’ and ‘we’ is all readers – Pakistanis and Indians – but especially Pakistanis because most ATP readers are from Pakistan.)

On the question of partition, I agree wholeheartedly with the stand that one took and disagree with the other. It matters little what I believe on this question, and what I believe today in 2006, 59 years after the fact, matters even less becasue it is now irrelevant to the course that history has taken. But if they were here today to read this, I am very sure that both would understand. And that is exactly what this is about: Understanding.

The reason these pictures are so important to me is that here are two people who disagreed on the India-Pakistan question as much as any two people possibly could, and at the deepest levels. And, yet, here they are; able to stand together and genuinely smile. Disagree, but smile. And ultimately to accept the course that history took; a course, mind you, that neither was particularly happy with. If they could, then why can’t we?

As a Pakistani I am in debt of Mr. Gandhi for the stand he took in trying to halt the horrible carnage that followed partition. Paying the ultimate price for that stand. My understanding is that the very first time ever that the Pakistan flag officially flew at half-mast was at Gandhi ji’s death. All government offices in Paksitan were closed in mourning of Mr. Gandhi’s death.

Mr. Gandhi probably disliked the idea of Pakistan more than any other Indian political leader; because he could not bear seeing his beloved India divided. On that bit, I disagree with him. But, once the deed was done he also recognized that the death and violence which followed was too high a price to pay for that disagreement. So much so that he was willing to put his own life on the line and go on hunger strike to stop the carnage. For that alone, I will always respect and admire him.

As did Mr. Jinnah. Here is the uncharacteristically (for Jinnah) emotional message of condolence he sent:

“I am shocked to learn of the most dastardly attack on the life of Mr. Gandhi, resulting in his death. There can be no controversy in the face of death. Whatever our political differences, he was one of the greatest men produced by the Hindu community, and a leader who commanded their universal confidence and respect. I wish to express my deep sorrow, and sincerely sympathize with the great Hindu community and his family in their bereavement at this momentous, historical and critical juncture so soon after the birth of freedom and freedom for Hindustan and Pakistan. The loss to the Dominion of India is irreparable, and it will be very difficult to fill the vacuum created by the passing away of such a great man at this moment.”

The language he uses is the language of his time, but the grief in unmistakable; as is, I believe, the respect Jinnah had for his long-time adversary. They came to very different conclusions about how to get there, but both wanted a future which did not have constant tension, conflict and distrust. Once Pakistan was created, Mr. Jinnah’s energy and focus was on Pakistan, not India. I have already written recently about Mr. Jinnah’s vision (here) so I will not repeat it. But note that it is Pakistan-centric, not India-focussed. But let me invite you also to revisit the video footage from 1947 that I had posted earlier (here) and also the analysis Bhupinder had done in comparing the first speeches of Mr. Jinnah and Mr. Nehru to their respective countries (here).

I know that I have probably challenged, and violated, the real and constructed sense of histories that the followers of these great men have on either side of the border. If so, I apologize. I could be wrong. I do not wish to rewrite history. They had very real, and very deep, and very profound, and ultimately irreconcilable differences. That we know. But that, exactly, is my point. If, despite those great differences they could come out eventually to accept history as it happened – even when they did not like it (Gandhi, because India was divided; Jinnah, because it was not divided right and gave him a ‘moth-eaten’ Pakistan) … and if they could work towards a vision, each in his own ways, of a future for their people that was stable, secure and without conflict; then why can’t we? If they, who were in the midst of that political moment could actually get past the moment and see larger realities, ever greater priorities of their own people, why can’t we? Of this one thing I am certain, especially on this day, they would have wished us to.

Finally, I know I have probably enflamed the passions of ‘super-patriots’ on both sides of the border. (Even though, for some, these passions seem to be always enraged.) I know that many of you are itching to educate me in all the ways that I am wrong. On how one of these two men was the hero and the other not. I suspect that for some readers (guess which ones!) I am being ‘too Pakistani’; for others (guess again!) ‘not Pakistani enough.’

For all of you, I have only one request. Just for today, please, hold those passions back.

When I was small, my grandmother told me that just as one does not speak ill of the dead at their funeral, one also does not go to someone’s celebrations to rant on them. It is not a South Asian thing to do. That is not our heritage. We are – all of us – a hospitable people, a decent people, a loving people. At least that is what we tell ourselves. So, just for today, let us try to prove it to.

Tomorrow, you can start sending me your hate emails with all those gaalis that I cannot even understand. Today, join me all – Pakistanis and Indians – in wishing India and her people a happy Independence Day and a prosperous future.

42 responses to “Independence Day Greetings for India”

  1. Ananda says:

    I was also surprised that Riitu’s utopian comment generated such response. But I believe AAdil when he says that he is not attacking Riitu’s message but trying to explain the Pakistani reaction to it. It helped me better understand why many Pakistanis do react so strongly to what I have always considered a gesture of peaceful coexistence. And it is good to learn to understand each other’s views. I also agree with Ashokamitra that so most, most, most Indians this is not even an issue. Those who obsess about this are very few, but as someone said they shout out loud. We are very happy with what we have and we just want to exist in peace with everyone around us. It is good to know from this discussion and website that there are those in Pakistan who wish the same. Peace to all.

  2. Ashokamitra says:

    Just discovered this excellent site and looking forward to many stimulating reads. I wanted to thank Adil for his generous and thoughtful initiative of wishing Indians well on the occasion of their Independence Day. Blogging carries the real potential of increasing person-to-person contact between ordinary Indians and Pakistanis — and you deserve kudos for recognizing this opportunity. For after all is said and done, an average Indian has very little opportunity of meeting a counterpart from across the border, unless they happen to live outside South Asia (as I do) and such contacts are relatively rare even abroad.

    Regarding riitu’s well-meaning faux-pas about the re-unification of the Indian subcontinent, I can understand how unpleasantly that would jar on Pakistani sensibilities. I’m also a little puzzled that a young person (I don’t know why, but I’m assuming that riitu is young) would even have this notion. Most people of my generation and later, that is, those who were born and raised in independent India, have long taken Pakistan to be a final, accomplished fact and have no desire or interest in an eventual re-uniification. Our only beef with the Partition is that it was such an incomplete job: Pakistan was supposed to be a homeland for subcontinental Muslims, but by the time the dust cleared, huge numbers of Muslims were still left in India. And now we constantly hear about how India has the world’s second largest population of Muslims after Indonesia, raising fears that someday there might have to be yet another Partition, leading to further truncation of our homeland. If they (whoever “they” might be) imposed all this trauma on tens of millions of people, couldn’t they at least have completed the job in one go?

    Best wishes again for the wonderful post.

  3. riitu says:

    i didnt even remotely think that my utopian world view would stir a hornet’s nest.

    please adil, this is no way meant to tell you that you were not meant to be nor that your existence is a mistake !!

    we go too far back to get in to all that i think.

    i mentioned in the post that you would disagree…but its MY perspective. i felt like sharing it and i did.
    there are pros and cons to what i dream about but i do not think this is the space to go in to those.

    but c’est la vie as the french would say. we live with and manage our realities.
    who knows how our lives would have bene otherwise ?

  4. @Jai Hind:trolls are never welcomed.Keep trolling anyway.

  5. Adil Najam says:

    Dear Arjun, let me thank you for your comment. The civility and grace with which you write means much to me because I am convinced that one of the first steps has to be to rid our voice and vocabulary of the anger and distrust that so permeates most India-Pakistan dialogue. Too many of our compatriots are too willing to turn every discussion into an argument and to assume the very worst intention in whatever the other is saying. It is for this reason that I am doubly sorry if I was unable to be absolutely clear in my intent, and for that I apologize to you and to Riitu.

    I do not believe that the intention of her comment, or of many comments like that from my friends, are at all malicious. Far from it, as I said, I believe that in most cases they are made with the very best of intentions and out of a heartfelt desire for peace. What I was trying to explain was how that sentiment – no matter how well-meaning – translates to the Pakistani ear, and why. I have tried to work for a dialogue across boundaries long enough to realize that the worst fears that I might be tempted to ascribe are very often wrong. By the same token, I have learnt that many things we Pakistanis say, thinking they are benign, end up hurting others deeply. I was only trying to explain why Pakistanis react to that idea ass they do.

    Your comments, and this entire thread in general, has only reinforced my faith that there is room for a civil dialogue and a positive future for all the peoples of our region. There are a few, but only a few, who would wish it not to be so; but we must not let the obnoxiousness and loudness of those voices drown our own.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.