Emergency in Pakistan: What Can You Do?

Posted on November 11, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, About ATP, Pakistanis Abroad, Politics, Society
Total Views: 68871

Adil Najam

Protest by students at LUMS, Lahore against emergency in PakistanThe frustration and anger that one finds in the comments on the Emergency imposed by Gen. Musharraf in Pakistan is mirrored everywhere. In every conversation one has with any Pakistani anywhere. I was in Pakistan till last weekend and this pent-up feeling of frustration was evident in every conversation even before the Emergency was imposed.

It is, of course, a complex feeling emanating from the complex dynamics of our complex politics. At its very core, however, is the burning desire to be able to “do something” about what is happening made all the intense by a sense of helplessness about exactly what it is that we as citizens might, in fact, be able to do that might make a difference.
Since Saturday every conversation I have had with Pakistanis ends in exactly this question. What can we do? I have an in-box full of emails asking me to sign a petition, attend a meeting, say this or that to the media if I speak to them, join a protest, pass on a message, do this or that on ATP, join a conference call to plan a strategy, send out notes to my contacts, and so much more. There have been call after call from friends and acquaintance many of whom not even Pakistanis who just want to talk and share the intensity of their disgust at how the events are unfolding.

Of course, at the basest level doing anything – anything at all – has a cathartic effect and makes one feel that at least we did not do nothing. But the desire to do something is more intense. The desire not to just be a spectator to history. The desire to have contributed something, somehow. As one watches the heroic struggle of the lawyers, and now the students, to stand up and speak out – despite the brutality they are met with – makes this desire even more intense.

We each do what we can. We speak out to the media (I have had more than a dozen media interviews and comments already, we give talks (I have been giving multiple talks on this a day), we send out messages of support to those on the front lines in Pakistan to let them know that they are not alone, we sign petitions, and above all we hold hands in solidarity and vent our feelings where ever we can – on blogs, on phone calls to friends, in gatherings. All of this helps some, but one keeps wondering if it really makes a difference to the big picture?

Even if it is not, it is clearly worth doing. But can more be done? What? How? We would like to hear from our readers on that. Please let us know what is already happening as well as suggest what more could happen.

COAS President house Pakistan Are there to many petitions going around; so many that they might lose their efficacy? Are some of us crossing the line between that which is anti-Musharraf and that which is anti-Pakistan? Even if they mean the same thing, strategically would a message that is pro-constitution, pro-democracy, pro-Pakistani resistance be better than one that is anti-individual? How can one best support those lawyers and students and others who are on the front-line of action, especially those who are not physically there? What, if any, are the dangers of focusing our attention too much of external actors rather than those in Pakistan itself? How does one explain to the media and policy-makers abroad that the events we are seeing is not the failure of a nation (the Pakistani people) these are the failure of a person and a particular government? (I personally have been saying to friends and to the media that I remain bullish on Pakistan and bearish on Musharraf).

These and many others are the questions that boil in ones head. There must be other questions too. Share these with us, but more importantly point us towards answers. Share with our readers what you are doing. How others can help. What should be done.

Note to commentors: My own views on the subject have been pretty clear and I feel no compulsion to either defend them or amend them. While I consider thsi emergency an anti-Pakistan and anti-Pakistani act, I do not doubt the patriotism or integrity of those who disagree. Pakistaniat is based on the premise that there can be, have to be, multiple views and they all must be respected, even when we disagree with them. Those of us who resent the emergency because it has tried to silence certain voices cannot then silence or disempower those who disagree with our views.

I say all this because over the last few days we have had to moderate out too many comments. More, in fact, from people we might agree with than those who we do not. One realizes that the moment is tense and passions are flared, but we stand committed to implementing our comment policy as best as we can. We have moderated, and will continue to do so, not because of content but because of infringements of our comment policy. We are, and will remain, especially careful about inappropriate language, personal attacks, inflammatory and disrespectful tactics, uncivil and slanderous language, and irrelevant diatribes. Please help us in not moderating your comment out by resisting these things. (And, please stop sending us notes about why you can misbehave because someone else did; we try to catch these things as best as we can and even if we miss them sometimes that does not give others a liscence to misbehavior). We remain committed to having a civil discourse and no matter whether we agree with you or not, no matter if you are an old friend or anew acquaintance, we will do our best to maintain that civility. If and when we feel that we are unable to do so, we are more likely to just close down the blog then to give in to people’s tantrums and badtameezi.

216 responses to “Emergency in Pakistan: What Can You Do?”

  1. Watan Aziz says:

    @Justice Mushir Alam

    First, thank you for your service and dedication to values of independence of judiciary. The example of 60+ judges resigning is unprecedented and unparalleled. Your actions will be taught in the history books of judiciary books for times to come.

    Second, would it not be even a greater service to the country, if you and your brethren get together and help publish a proposal for the top down and broad reinventing of justice in Pakistan? Now that you are both free and experienced and most importantly have the support of broad range of society.

    The nation will owe a greater measure of gratitude.

    Pakistanis have gone far to long, on a broken system in delaying and denying justice to the common man. This is untenable.

    The current setup of separate but equal benches both at federal and provincial level, without the judicial review is dead wrong. Pakistan needs a court for constitutional matters. The lowers courts are dysfunctional. There are not enough lower court and small claims court judges and clerical support. The docketing automation is primitive if available at all. The court documents and forms (e.g. kachi and pakki) are archaic and lack clarity. The language of the court needs to be the language of the people.

    Most importantly, the courts need to be on a fixed time track to dispose off the cases. The endless and countless postponements destroy any sense of justice and deny the victim a sense of any justice.

    I can go on and on, but you from the inside out know all bad spots.

    Help us help you!

  2. Thank you for the invaluable support, I see on the web page. I just did what my concience guided me and what I thought was right. To do what is right and just is my bounden duty, the position I held was a sacred trust, which I held for the people of Pakistan and refused to take fresh Oath and refused reappointment instead of reinstatement I did no sacrifice but answered what I was called upon to do as a trustee of public trust.
    Justice (deposed) Mushir Alam Sindh High Court 25-2-2009
    email worldadwiser@hotmail.com

  3. Suresh says:

    All the best to Pakistan.

  4. Daktar says:

    It is interesting how a few people on this site keep trying to change the focus to BB and Nawaz Sharif rather than Musharraf. Standard divisionary tactic; spam the site with many messages to confuse the issue.

    Yes, BB was and is really bad. So what? Does that give Musharraf the liscence to be worse? Sure she is a pawn of the US. So what? Musharraf is a bigger pawn of the US and accepts it.

    Since when is the argument that the alternative is bad a reason to stick with someone who is clearly worse!

    What we all need to do is to not let this argument overwhelm the real issue which is Musharraf’s martial law, destruction of justice and free speech in Pakistan and turning our country into another tinpot dictatorship.

  5. Salma says:

    Pakistanis everywhere are sick n tired of Musharraf and his govt. Everywhere you go in Lahore you hear the same thing. Its time for him to go.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.