By Yasser Latif Hamdani
Last week (February 6) marked the 114th Birthday of one of Pakistan’s greatest unsung heroes. Once again, there was no mention of commemoration of his remarkable like. No sense of gratitude from a nation for which he did so much. He has been wiped out of our memory because he was an Ahmadi, despite his glorious contributions to Pakistan and its cause (see related post on Dr. Abdul Salam).
Sir Zafrullah Khan’s services rendered to Muslims of India, Pakistan and the Third World are second only to that of Quaid-e-Azam Mahomed Ali Jinnah. As a jurist, a diplomat and a patriot he stood head and shoulders above the lesser men who have made a mockery of our republic.
Born in 1893 in Sialkot in what was to become one of the earliest Ahmaddiya households, this small town boy rose to be one of the shrewdest legal minds of his time. His early education was in Sialkot, after which he proceeded to Lahore for his bachelors degree, under the tutelage of none other than the great Iqbal himself. He got his law degree from King’s College London in 1914, where he stood top of his class and was the first person from the Indian subcontinent to do so. He was, like most great figures of that time, called to bar at Lincoln’s Inn.
As a practicing lawyer, he soon proved his mettle and had many reported cases to his name. The first major politician to recognize Zafrullah’s talents was Sir Fazli Hussain, the founder of Unionist Party of Punjab. Starting his career in his early 30s as a member of the Punjab legislative Council, he rose to prominence as an indefatigable crusader for Muslims of Punjab. Later he represented the Muslims at round table conference and crossed swords with figures like Jinnah and Gandhi. In 1931, he became the Muslim League president and at the roundtable conference, he cornered no less a person than Churchill in a committee hearing who was forced to accept Zafrullah’s point of view.
Later he was offered a seat on Viceroy’s permanent Council, which he took to further his cause. He also served at varying times as the minister of Railways, Public works, labour and law under the Viceroy. For a brief period, he also became British India’s representative to the League of Nations, just before it was dissolved.
However his greatest contribution came when he drafted the famous Lahore Resolution, which till this day is the rallying point of Pakistan and Pakistani nationalism. He had been tasked with finding a common point between the popular demand for “Pakistan” and Muslim League’s all India requirements. The Lahore resolution was a broad based solution which left the door virtually open for several solutions and negotiation on the issue of partition. In essence it envisaged 2 or 3 great republics for the Muslim peoples and it was this document which forms the basis not just of Pakistan but also of Bangladesh. For this he got a lot of slack. No less a person than Khan Abdul Wali Khan highlighted Zafrullah’s religious belief to play on the popular conspiracy theory that holds Ahmadis to be British touts.
Later from 1942 onwards, he served as a federal judge (equivalent of an Supreme court C judge) of India and finally took leave on the eve of Pakistan to serve the cause of Pakistan before the Radcliffe Commission, on Jinnah’s personal request. On 25th December 1947, Jinnah appointed him the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. At the UN, Sir Zafrullah emerged as the most eloquent advocate of all third world and Islamic issues. It was Zafrullah whose efforts materialized into the UN Resolutions on Kashmir, which are the basis of the Pakistani case and grievance. Later he became the first Asian president of the International Court of Justice, a singular and unique honor for any Pakistani. He also served, briefly, as the President of the UN General Assembly. He passed away in September of 1983 in Lahore.
A prolific author on the history of Pakistan and Islam, his most famous book was titled “Agony of Pakistan” in which he makes plain the great betrayal which wrested the country from the hands of its patriots into the hands of those who were its greatest enemies. Ironically, today Jinnah’s most trusted lieutenant is not even remembered by the state which owes him so much, including its own founding document. It is the memory of people like Zafrullah Khan that will keep alive the original idea of Pakistan and there is no doubt that one day the posterity will reclaim its true destiny as a progressive and modern republic.
Yasser Latif Hamdani is a lawyer in Lahore and a researcher of the history of the Pakistan Movement.
Two wrongs will not make one right. Hussain Haqqani is not an authority on Islam or Islamic History. We are living witness to the black and white. Ahmadies have created lesser prophets to follow the last prophet. They declare all other muslims as Kafirs
Much has already been debated about this issue and I think the Ahmadies should not use this forum to clarify their ”innocence’ or ”bona fide” to stir sentiments of muslims.
Here is the link:
“Weeding Out the Heretics”: Sectarianism in Pakistan
by Husain Haqqani
http://www.futureofmuslimworld.com/research/pubID. 58/pub_detail.asp
An interesting article by Hussain Haqani on the rise of religious militancy in Pakistan. Very pertinent in the current environment. Sections relevant to Zafrulla Kahn quoted.
Bottom line: Its been politics all along. Label of religion is to cover the real motivation of self interest and to get popular support.
Al-Ayyam newspaper on his visit to Damascus:
A three-member delegation of Libya, including the Secretary General of Libya’s Liberation Council, called on Pakistan Ambassador in Cairo, Haji Abdus Sattar Seth, on June 20, 1950 and expressed their country’s gratitude to Pakistan for the services rendered by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, Chaudhry Muhammad Zafarullah Khan in connection with the independence of Libya. The delegation said
(News was carried by papers dated June 21, 1950).
Syed Sharifuddin Pirzada:
“From Sialkot to the Security Council, from Round Table Conferences to international conferences, from the Join Parliamentary Committee on Constitutional Reforms to the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan, from the Viceroy’s Executive Council to the Pakistan Cabinet, from the Indian Assembly to the General Assembly of the United Nations and from the Federal Court of the sub-continent to the International Court of Justice, Chaudhry Zafarullah’s contribution is clean and consistent, creditable and commendable.”
Dawn, Karachi, March 3, 1964
From Beyond the Veil: Israel-Pakistan Relations - by P. R. Kumaraswamy
[quote]
Pakistan was represented by its able and articulate Foreign Minister Sir Zafrulla Khan (1893-1985). Capitalizing on his legal background, he vehemently argued that the UN had no legal or juridical authority to partition Palestine. He led the group of Islamic countries that opposed the partitioning of Palestine, and when this attempt failed, he sought to limit the size of the proposed Jewish state. On the eve of the General Assembly vote, he suggested, “the Arab state should be almost entirely Arab-owned and the Jewish state should be almost entirely Jewish owned.� Had this amendment been accepted, he argued:
… the area of the Jewish state would have been reduced practically to the lands which the Jews owned. That is to say, it would have given the Jews only 40 per cent of what is now being included within the Jewish state and it would have been made the constitution of an independent Jewish State practically impossible.
Zafrulla Khan thus became the most articulate opponent of the partition plan. In the words of one Israeli official, he “was undoubtedly one of the ablest and most impressive delegates present from any country.�
[/quote]
http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/memoranda/memo55.pdf
Remembering Zafrulla Khan - by Khalid Hasan
[quote]
Professor K.K. Aziz, the only true historian produced by Pakistan, said of Zafrulla that all his life he served his country with single-minded devotion and in an upright and principled way. He served the movement that led to the establishment of Pakistan. And while we, the Pakistani Muslims, excommunicated him from our religion, we should not excommunicate him from our memory too because nations which forget their great men ultimately stop producing them.
[/quote]
http://www.khalidhasan.net/fridaytimes/2003-08-15. htm