Ayesha Siddiqa’s “Military Inc.” Causes Waves in Pakistan

Posted on June 1, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Books, Politics
120 Comments
Total Views: 76830

Adil Najam

As was expected – but much more so than expected becasue of its timing – Ayesha Siddiqa’s new book Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy is causing waves in Pakistan and abroad.

True to form, the establishment has bothed up things even more than usual by trying to mess with the book’s launch in Islamabad. That only made the launch an even bigger news than it would have been. Here, for example, is the top of the page, front page news item from Dawn (June 1, 2007):

A book putting a critical spotlight on the military’s business nooks was launched from a virtual sanctuary on Thursday and some high-profile political reviewers seized upon it to denounce the army’s role in Pakistani politics.

The launching of the book, Military Inc: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy, by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa, a military analyst, was due to have taken place at the capital’s elitist Islamabad Club. But the author told a surprised audience that not only the club cancelled the booking of its auditorium, “all hotels in Islamabad were also told� by unspecified authorities not to allow the use of their halls for this, forcing the organisers to find a sanctuary at a third floor room provided by a non-governmental organisation.

PPP’s legal star Aitzaz Ahsan said the time had come to stand up against the military dominance while PML-N Information Secretary Ahsan Iqbal accused Pakistan army generals of not learning a lesson from other countries that said goodbye to military rule. But some other speakers had a dig also at politicians for doing little to keep the military in check while being in power and at times celebrating the ouster of their rivals. Mr Aitzaz Ahsan said the expose of Ayesha, who puts the net worth of the army’s commercial empire at Rs200 billion, had come at a “defining moment� in Pakistan’s history following President Pervez Musharraf’s controversial charge-sheeting and suspension of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry.

He narrated what he called the military’s moves in the past to convert Pakistan into a national security state contrary to the Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s vision of a welfare state and to forge an alliance with mullahs in search of an ideological justification for this, but said he thought now “a watershed has comeâ€Â?. Mr Ashan, who heads Justice Iftikhar’s legal team, saw “a turning pointâ€Â? in the March 9 presidential action against the chief justice that plunged the country into a judicial crisis and said: “We must grasp it.â€Â? Cheers went up in the congested premises of the NGO Leadership for Environment and Development as Mr Ahsan referred to what he called an unexpected “noââà ¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ã‚? by the chief justice to the president’s demand for his resignation and, in a reference to the nationwide protest movement by lawyers, opposition political activists and the civil society, said: “The spillway of the Tarbela Dam has opened now.â€Â? He said although the chief justice would not speak about the presidential reference pending before the five-judge Supreme Judicial Council or his challenge to the reference before a 13judge bench of the Supreme Court, it was out of compulsion that an affidavit was filed on his behalf on Tuesday about what happened to him during his March 9 meeting with the president and for some days afterwards. “We were compelled to file that affidavit,â€Â? Mr Ahsan said, citing comments made by President Musharraf about the case as the reason.

Mr Iqbal rejected as a myth usual accusations holding politicians responsible for four military coups in Pakistan’s history and put the blame on what he called ambitions of army chiefs who toppled civilian governments from General Mohammad Ayub Khan, who later became field marshal, to General Musharraf. Comparing the ills of military interventions in politics to what cancer does to human body, he said Ayub Khan struck in October 1958 to pre-empt scheduled elections next year, while General Yahya Khan snatched power from him in 1969 at “virtual gunpoint� to prevent a handover to a National Assembly Speaker from then East Pakistan in the midst of a national democratic movement.

General Mohammad Zia-ulHaq, he recalled, seized power on June 5, 1977 a day after then prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the opposition Pakistan National Alliance had agreed to hold fresh elections. He said Pakistan faced no bankruptcy despite international sanctions for its 1998 nuclear tests and “everything was normal� when General Musharraf, after being sacked, toppled then prime minister Nawaz Sharif on Oct 12, 1999. Mr Zafar Abbas, resident editor of Dawn, Islamabad, and Dr Farrukh Saleem, also complimented the 292-page book published by the Oxford University Press.

It speaks about the role of the military power in transforming the Pakistani society, armed forces becoming an independent class entrenched in the corporate sector and their five giant welfare foundations, or conglomerates, running thousands of businesses ranging from petrol pumps to industrial plants.

I have not yet read the book myself, however, I have talked about it with Ayesha many times – most recently in Boston some weeks ago – and am generally familiar with the thesis of the book. But, then, so is most of Pakistan. It is that the Military’s economic footprint has become too large for teh military’s own good. From cereal to banks to airlines, what she calls ‘Military Inc.’ is now everywhere in Pakistan’s economic life. Her argument is that this is nietehr good for Pakistan nor the military.

I am looking forward to reading and reviewing the book, which Ayesha has promised to send me soon. Meanwhile, we will keep an eye out for substantive reviews of this undoubtedly important work.

120 responses to “Ayesha Siddiqa’s “Military Inc.” Causes Waves in Pakistan”

  1. Javed says:

    The time has come to send the army back to barracks to safegaurd the country. This is the role, they are supposed to play. If they indulge in politics, they must be ready for criticism and accept the failures as a result of their policies. In this modern world, only that society prospers where common norms of democracy prevail. Democracy is not only a form of government but it is a culture which guarantees security, equality and rule of law. I request all powerful generals to pity this poor county and get aside. Let the politicians do their job good or bad but it is sure one day people will succeed in filtering them; they will keep the good ones and throw out the garbage. It is only possible through fair and free elections at specified intervals. Otherwise, our society will be full of mess and this mess will keep increasing as we have witnessed so far.

  2. Toryalai says:

    [quote comment=”51888″]Tribute to pak army pvt(ltd)

    —Pay tribute to Pak-Army
    “Aey watan key sajeeley jernaelo,
    Sarey RAQBEY tumhaarey liey hain,
    KOTHIYUN key talabgaar ho tum,
    PLOTOUN key parastaar ho tum,
    O corruption ki zinda misalo,
    yeh sauday tumharey liey hain,
    aey watan key NASHEELAY……….”[/quote]
    میں Ù†Û’ سوچا آپ Ú©Û’ لءے اÙ

  3. Rajput Gaddi says:

    Tribute to pak army pvt(ltd)

    —Pay tribute to Pak-Army
    “Aey watan key sajeeley jernaelo,
    Sarey RAQBEY tumhaarey liey hain,
    KOTHIYUN key talabgaar ho tum,
    PLOTOUN key parastaar ho tum,
    O corruption ki zinda misalo,
    yeh sauday tumharey liey hain,
    aey watan key NASHEELAY……….”

  4. Rajput Gaddi says:

    Tribute to pak army pvt(ltd)
    —Pay tribute to Pak-Army
    “Aey watan key sajeeley jernaelo,
    Sarey RAQBEY tumhaarey liey hain,
    KOTHIYUN key talabgaar ho tum,
    PLOTOUN key parastaar ho tum,
    O corruption ki zinda misalo,
    yeh sauday tumharey liey hain,
    aey watan key NASHEELAY……….”

  5. Rajput Gaddi says:

    Simple questions for pakistan army (PVT) LTD.
    Is there any county which is making progress in this world under army rule, how many from 150 countries?, in 21century army has ruled 30years out of 60 in pakistan, and wants more? Is it lust of robbing national wealth.

    How many countries spending 60 to 70 percnet budget on army and 2% on education minmum standard si 4% of gdp accroding t oUN, even nepol, srilanka, bangladesh are spending more than 4% on education.

    Is there any army which is running property business, banks, civilian institutions in world?, 600 retired army personnel is running different dept in pakistan, have u ever seen such kind of happening in any country in history all over the world?.

    Have u ever seen that a chief of army staff is judging the credibility of Chief justice of Supreme court of the country?,
    Due to army rule a chief justice is asking justice, has that happened in any where in the world.

    How many wars has our army won yet? While we r giving her 60 to 70% budget of the country for last 60years. There should be atleast some balance on reward and performance. Kitna looto ge garib awam ko.
    In islami history banglades defeat was the biggest one, even bigger than spain and turkey.
    They have arm n ammunation but still they accepted defeat, it was first time in islami history that u got ammunatain and accept defeated.

    YE FIROON-O-HAAMAAN-O-QAROON SAREY
    SABHI MUFLISOO KEY BANAYE HUE HAIN.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*