Is Right the New Left in Pakistan

Posted on November 18, 2007
Filed Under >Qandeel Shaam, Society
71 Comments
Total Views: 52506

Qandeel Shaam

Honton ko si kar dekhiye pachtaiye ga aap
Hangame jaag uthte hain aksar ghuttan ke baad

Any anodyne effect this sher might have had on me was lost forever when my neo-Trotskyite friend decided to give me his interpretation of it. I didn’t ask for it, but there it was. A multi-headed hydra called “having coffee” – where the conversation starts off polite, turns to prittle-prattle , turns to poetry, turns to politics, turns to polemics, turns to punches. Lucky for me, he hits like a girl.

“Religious extremism is the new communism,”

he hissed, spraying spittle in all directions. I laughed. He carried on, unperturbed but passionate:

“The poor man has found his outlet – the injustice, the exploitation, the degradation, the desperation he’s suffered has found its expression. Islam, like communism, is based on egalitarian principles and promises them justice and equality. You think religious extremism has got anything to do with religion? It is nothing but the collective voice of a people who’ve been wronged their whole lives.”

Somehow this gave me goose bumps and I quickly gulped down the latte in hope of thawing the chill his words left. It didn’t work and I got to thinking about Pakistan and Pakistanis everywhere.

Religious extremists in Pakistan can come from all walks of life but a sizeable chunk belongs to the poorer section of the society. Pakistani immigrants and expatriates living in the West also make up a significant portion. Why are these two groups more prone to religious extremism and terrorism? Was it that, time and again, they were discriminated against and shunted to silence? Did the exclusion leave such bitterness that it got bottled up inside for so long – so long that it is now, quite literally, exploding?

In Pakistan’s context, the implication that religious extremism is connected to poverty and disfranchisement has been made not with a bang but a whimper (pun unintended). I think this concept needs to be forced to the fore. Many in the corridors of power are finding it convenient to ignore the ‘real’ reasons leading to Islamic radicalism, as that may point the j’accuse finger in their direction. But let’s briefly look at why a 19 year old Pakistani boy picks up a Kalashnikov or why a 37 year old father of three straps explosives around his waist.

It’s no secret that democratic institutions in Pakistan are in a frail state, if at all alive.

And then there is no Left or not much left of it. (The Communist Party of India could arguably be a good example of the importance of such a “balance of power” – on the domestic front at least.) In Pakistan very few avenues are open to the poor in need of some succour or just in need of voicing their distress. So, what happens? Under a dictatorship, and with no diversity of political parties to choose from, the poor, frustrated man turns to the radical Right – the Mullahs and their might.

Pakistani religious extremists living in the West dance to a slightly different tune. Feeling discriminated, displaced, alienated or plain confused – they crave to cling to a core, something that will anchor their sense of identity. Often times this comes in the form of religion. Sometimes its taken to an extreme. So, the religious radical turns to radicalism not out of a love for religion, but a deep hatred for those elements that he felt were unjust towards him (or his brethren.) Anti-Western sentiments do not transpire from Koranic verses, instead they’re born of the experiences one had in/of the West and the bitter taste that can leave in one’s mouth… body and soul.

This is important. Scholars like Nichole Argo have accentuated the point: emotional and social ties precede the acquisition of ideology. Either our social situation has to be in the doldrums or our emotional condition so wounded that we take a religious ideology to an extreme. The media almost always portrays the religious extremist or terrorist as a gun-slinging gung-ho Islamist with a medieval mind and beard to boot. He is a dangerous, diehard jihadi on a mission to kill or be martyred trying. Such a description is like a donut-truth; the truth, the whole truth, with a hole in the truth (I forget what film this line is from). That hole is the real reasons people are pushed to accept a radicalised Islam, and these reason need to be better understood if we sincerely hope to curb extremism. Half-measures – like madrassa reformation – being implemented by our marginal-satisfiers might prove productive in that they’re broadening the narrow teachings of many religious seminaries. But they’re not preventing extremism. People, especially the poor and alienated, will continue to feel helpless in the face of a system they despise but can’t do anything to change. In fact, they may feel, and most do, that the measures being taken to tackle extremism are the spawn of the West, the very demon they wish to slay. So, they will continue feeling dejected and cheated. This inadvertently leads to the shift in their psyche that paves way for an extremist view.

Some extremists may genuinely be harbouring a twisted interpretation of religion, and others may just be twisted by nature. But I believe that for most the acquisition of a radical religious ideology is triggered from a more fundamental feeling of victimisation, of feeling wronged, and/or being part of a harshly unjust system. In such cases religion offers unction, and a bandwagon-effect ensues whereby millions of disempowered and discriminated find a mouthpiece and meaning in the Right. Ironically, the factors thrusting them to the extreme right is born of leftist logic; an anti-establishment egalitarian cry for equal rights for the common citizen.

(How corrupt leaders exploit this feeling in the masses to further their own political interests is another matter. Also I would like to advise everyone to not turn this into a debate about Islam. It is about how the basic wrongs in society which cause an individual to adopt an extremist view, and how it is these wrongs that need to be focused if we wish to break free from the vicious cycle of militancy and dictatorship.)

Photo Credits: Flickr.com

71 responses to “Is Right the New Left in Pakistan”

  1. Aqil Sajjad says:

    Reports of fresh arrests of journalists in Karachi in their peaceful demonstration. At this point, the number of the arrested people is not known.

  2. Aqil Sajjad says:

    Video of the huge anti-IJT demonstration at Punjab University

    here

  3. Qandeel says:

    Crimson, Bhitai: agreed. I personally see the extremist groups more as a resistance or reactionaries even, rather than revolutionaries. Perhaps they believe in a Taliban-style government as the best alternative, but I think the poor man who saw his relative die fighting in the tribal areas, and feels forlorn and forsaken by a system that couldn’t find him work, etc, would be driven more by frustration and desperation than a rational plan on how to change the system.

    Start Your Protest, thanks for the interesting links. I’ll definitely give them a read.

    Ibrahim, I don’t understand why you’re lambasting Raza when you’ve already pointed out that ‘extremism’ has not been defined. Perhaps I should have been explicit about my meaning from the outset. But as you and Abid have suggested (I think), it is not easy to define the term. “Extremism” can be quite subjective and context-specific. For example, Abid might have thought I was being “extremely” liberal (?) in my last blog and is still having a difficult time grappling with 72 virgins. Sorry, Abid.

    As for the second part of your question, it isn’t as relevant as I was trying to keep the focus on Pakistanis, not Saudis. But it is no secret that Saudi Arabia is mired in a human rights crisis, and then there is a pro-western ruling elite – the two together may be causing a lot of resentment in the people. Again it might go back to how it is our lack of rights and the imposition of a western world order etc that rankles us to “extremism.” Subject warrants more study.

  4. Rafay Kashmiri says:

    Qandeel,

    @your post talks about Right and Left, in the same
    context I am so disappointed by no-reaction from
    ATP’s commentators on the subject of BB,PPP and
    US door to door shuttle survice offered to their
    Puppet protectorate ! I prefer expressing in a verse:

    Ghareebon ki muhabbat,roti, kapra aur Makaan,

    lutta dia hay sab kuch BB, tu sajja lay apni Dukaan

  5. Ibrahim, atleast Raza and others liberals don’t surprise me anymore ;)

    The point raised by Israr is very important. Will all anti-Imran or Pro-Mush supporters start calling him extremist just because he wants to express his feelings about Imran? If yes then same analogy works for those as well who practice Islam and are called extremist because of different ideology.

    The terms like extremists, fundamentalist,radicals and Islamo-fascist were coined by Neocons ,Freemasons and other right wing parties of America who are more extremist and fascist than any other org in world. Their hatred against Islam and Muslims is quite natural and it’s not new either.

    The funniest thing is lefts buy theories of one cabal of Right and condemn other. If you notice, most of such leftist preachers reside in US. Why? because they get influenced easily by American right-wingers who keep feeding them toffee of enlightmenet and moderation and they get happy like kids feel happy after getting toffes.

    American right use them similarly like Zia used Altaf Hussain(a secular leftist) for his purpose and Altaf didn’t even know at all. In 10th November’s Dawn(Sunday), I read statement of Bush that despite of all things currently going on in Islamabad, he wants to work with Mush and do you know why? because it’s hell easy to fool a leftist to destruct something than a right winger because a right winger knows very well the mentality of other right wing cabal hence try to battle with them directly. They(American right) re-tried to deal with them in Afghanistan,Iraq and Lebonan but failed miserably. This is why you see Americans have been working at backend and pushing Pakistani left to fight against Pakistani right because difference among a nation would be more fruitful for them than battling with them directly. This is what Mush has done so far, created a big gap between Pakistanis by bringing terms enlightened and extremist and brought hatred against Pakistan Army. Both things are dangerous for Pakistan itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*