Imran, Altaf, PIA and Pakistan Politics

Posted on June 15, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, People, Politics
115 Comments
Total Views: 49555

Adil Najam

Flying in from London to Islamabad, I bumped into Imran Khan on the plane. There he was, sitting a couple of rows ahead of me, reading The News, with his own picture on its front page (meeting Nawaz Sharif in London). I had not yet seen the paper, nor followed that days events in London (I was flying in from Amsterdam where I had been in meetings all day). We exchanged a few pleasantries, said nice things about what we had been up to since we had last met in Chicago just about a year ago (I had reported in detail on that here).

I must say, I did not fully grasp everything he said until later after I landed in Islamabad and first saw his supporters and TV cameras lined up at the airport, and then every news channel covering his press conference in London, and its political implications. In our short conversation he pretty much covered the exact same points I saw him presenting on TV,with pretty much the same passion. I guess he had come fresh from the press conference. Since all of that is now in the news already, I will not repeat it. The one thing I did ask him about were rumors about his ‘patch up’ with the MQM leading to the lifting of the ban on his entry into Sindh. Readers would remember those rumors surfacing everywhere, including on ATP, a few days ago. He shrugged those away as nonsense and just rumors.

My own sense from this very brief discussion chat was that:

(a) he does seem very serious abut taking on MQM Chief Altaf Hussain,
(b) that he fully realizes the seriousness of what he is doing, and
(c) he seems to be doing this out of personal conviction much more than political opportunism.

I may turn out to be wrong, but my first impression was that the earnestness with which he spoke about what he was doing and why that cannot be easily faked. This, then, seems not to be a story that will fizzle away easily. Not if Imran can help it.

If this is, in fact, so then Pakistan politics will continue to become even more interesting than it already is. ‘Party’ politics may just come back into limelight, but not ways one had expected. If indeed there are to be elections in Pakistan soon then the impact of this tussle could go well beyond defining what happens to just Imran Khan and the MQM.

By the way, as it turned out it was an interesting PIA fight to be on. Interior Minister Aftab Sherpao boarded soon after me. As did Commerce Minister Humayun Akhtar Khan (returning, I believe from the WTO meeting in Geneva). They both greeted Imran graciously, and briefly, and then then nearly all of us made the best of the overnight flight by going off to sleep. Of course, I first watched the ‘Tribute to a Legend’ show on Pakistani filmstar Muhammad Ali on the PIA channel.

P.S. In case you wonder, no, I did not speak to either of the Ministers. I do not know either of them, and would not have known what to say anyhow, especially if either of them had seen my own most recent musings on the political happenings in Pakistan.

115 responses to “Imran, Altaf, PIA and Pakistan Politics”

  1. PakIavelli says:

    Imran Khan OR Shimran Kahn

    Hey folks – one thing is clear Immy would never ever have crept out of his political anonymity had it not been the knee jerk reaction of the hawks in MQM. MQM has shot itself in the foot by taking on this Idiot and given a boost to his ratings.

    Immy to me is just another opportunist and would be no different from any other wannabe, shyster or charlatan. His best credential is his claim as national sports hero NO MORE NO LESS.

    Shaukat Khanum – good but not good enuf. There are many more who have done 100 times bigger no profit projects but dont like publicity – unlike IMMY.

    Also Shaukat Khanum doe not give him any political charter buty it seems that he is cashing in on Shaukat Khanum and gaining political mileage.

    IMMY is the epitome of hypocrisy ands opportunism like many other pakistani politicians

    SO MY ADVISE TO PEOPLE– PLS DO NOT GET SWAYED BY HIS CHARM AND GET DUPED AGAIN- U WILL BE DOUBLE DISAPPOINTED

    MY ADVISE TO SHIMRAN KAHN: COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS, BE THANKFUL TO MQM FOR GIVING U ALL THIS FREE PUBLICITY AND MAYBE EVEN A SEAT THIS TIME WITHOUT ANY ADJUSTMENTS OR HELP FROM HIDDDEN HANDS

    PAKIAVELLI

  2. Pakavelli says:

    Imran Khan OR Shimran Kahn

    Hey folks – one thing is clear Immy would never ever have crept out of his political anonymity had it not been the knee jerk reaction of the hawks in MQM. MQM has shot itself in the foot by taking on this Idiot and given a boost to his ratings.

    Immy to me is just another opportunist and would be no different from any other wannabe, shyster or charlatan. His best credential is his claim as national sports hero NO MORE NO LESS.

    Shaukat Khanum – good but not good enuf. There are many more who have done 100 times bigger no profit projects but dont like publicity – unlike IMMY.

    Also Shaukat Khanum doe not give him any political charter buty it seems that he is cashing in on Shaukat Khanum and gaining political mileage.

    IMMY is the epitome of hypocrisy ands opportunism like many other pakistani politicians

    SO MY ADVISE TO PEOPLE– PLS DO NOT GET SWAYED BY HIS CHARM AND GET DUPED AGAIN- U WILL BE DOUBLE DISAPPOINTED

    MY ADVISE TO SHIMRAN KAHN: COUNT YOUR BLESSINGS, BE THANKFUL TO MQM FOR GIVING U ALL THIS FREE PUBLICITY AND MAYBE EVEN A SEAT THIS TIME WITHOUT ANY ADJUSTMENTS OR HELP FROM HIDDDEN HANDS

  3. observer says:

    I have to say I agree with Faraz, Mustafa and Skeptic more than the others. Imran Khan has his plus points and has a number of weaknesses as well. Yes, he was a great cricketer, spearheaded a cancer hospital, is bold enough to take on Altaf–all that is great. But weigh that against his voting record–voted for Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman for the PM slot instead of Jamali, abstained from voting for repeal of the Hudood Ordinance (which ironically upheld an adultery law), furthermore, mocked its repeal openly on tv shows, and then the whole thing with Sita White is undeniably a big negative. Perhaps one could have more respect for him if he acknowledged the mistake instead of refusing to talk about it–there is also the schizophrenic issue—denying it in Pakistan but posing for Hello with Tyrian; criticizing Pakistani elites and their ways but happily rubbing shoulders with Liz Hurley, Diana, Jemima and the like–just a bit too much baggage there for me.

    Having said all of that, I still think he can and does contribute to Pakistan but probably will not make a good PM. He can perhaps take on a portfolio that would make use of his single-minded and simplistic qualities–Interior Minister perhaps or something of that nature–definitely not something that involves diplomacy or level-headedness, like PM or Foreign Minister.

  4. king_faisal says:

    put yourself in the position of imran khan’s daughter. imagine how you would you feel if your own father refused to publicly acknowledge your existence much less do your pervarish when your mother died?

    imran khan’s indiscretions in his private life dont preclude him from running for public office. however its only natural that some voters will judge him by how his private conduct stacks up against his posturings in the public arena. imran khan started his political career by speaking a great deal about the superiority of islamic morality system. i am no expert on islamic theology but as far as i know, islam does not condone ignoring your own child. my stance on this issue is that men not willing to deal with the consequence of their own behaviour are losers be it young black men living in ghetto america or playboy star athletes hobnobbing with the jet set. dont do the crime if you are not willing to serve the time is a good motto in my opinion. i would have nothing but respect for imran khan if he acknowledged his past and dealt with the consequence like a man.

    i would also not be speaking about imran khan’s private life if he had not made private morality a public issue. moreover throughout his political career, imran has actively sided with religious right whose core platform is regulation of our private life best example of this policy being the hisba bill. no better example than the hypocrisy of imran khan than his demand that his private life is own business despite the fact that all through his political career he has shared a podium with religious right. sort of like cheney speaking against gay rights while attending the christianing ceremony of his grand child born to his lesbian daughter.

    imran’s hypocrisy is also seen by his recent alliance with nawaz sharif. imran accuses musharraf of being an american stooge for siding with the americans after 9/11. nawaz sharif in comparison supported the first iraq war eventhough saddam did not kill a single american. imran says musharraf, by filing a reference against supreme court judge, is damaging the judiciary. nawaz in comparison sent his goons to the supreme court to get rid of the chief justice. imran says musharraf is damaging the press. nawaz sharif shut down jang longer than musharraf closed geo. nawaz shareef banned imran khan from tv while under musharraf, imran khan is on tv 24×7. under nawaz, pakistan economy went into selective default. under musharraf, pakistan has $15bn of foreign reserves and has attracted this year $6bn in foreign investment.

    i could go on and on but would be waste of time because imran’s career wont amount to anything more than a hill of beans.

  5. Moeen Bhatti says:

    We should all support Imran Khan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*