Salman Shah Jilani
Switch on any TV channel, open up a newspaper or log on to social media and you will see our parliamentarians and their electorate especially those residing in the rural centers continuously drawing ire of the urban educated elite. At times participants in the TV talk shows having an intellectual discourse stoop low and raise eyebrows over the wisdom possessed by the electorate and flay their decision of re-electing the same person who is allegedly tainted.
Such feelings on the part of the educated elite incited me to ponder over the mystery shrouding the electorate who is willing to rally around the same bunch of politicians every time. And after introspection I came to the conclusion that the bone of contention is socio-economic imbalance prevailing in our society.
The conclusion I drew is a battle between two classes i.e. Haves and Have-nots. Both the classes will be at loggerheads till the time vast dichotomy in their status persists in our society.
All those born in well to do families, the “Haves” class, who had the privilege of going and graduating from good educational institutions, subsequently receiving offers from multinationals or a timely call from one of their family friend manages to reserve or create a slot for them. And then there exist “Have-nots” a class of people who is barely able to meet both the ends and for them sending their children to a good educational institutions is like asking them for an arm and a leg. Hence their children end up at “peela” schools and soon after graduating or dropping out of school they compete with other poorly skilled individuals and graduates of good educational institutions in a hotly contested job market where opportunities are scanty and at times only exist for those with the right “links.”
Hence for this class of people their economic benefit lies in linking up with their local power broker who is further linked to politicians or others in the corridors of power. There’s nothing outlandish, these masses make quite a rational decisions based on their needs and wants.
Short cuts don’t help any one, covets of martial law, Bangladesh model or mid term polls by the urban educated elite won’t help and might set a dangerous precedent for the future. Those disqualified on the grounds of possessing a fake degree were discredited by the urban educated elite, however their electorate seemed content with them and got them re-elected even after an onslaught by their opponents and media.
Did the electorate make an irrational decision? No they did not.
They vote for their tested people. They have experienced the elusive revolutionaries who have always usurped the throne impersonating as true representatives of the people in a quasi democracy which serves as a smokescreen to protract their rule.
During their stint as rulers, Pakistan was always plunged into darkness, majority has suffered because firstly their power brokers in these times do not enjoy the power they ought to, secondly better than modest economic growth witnessed during their regime failed to sustain and trickle down to the grass roots. And lastly the legacy left behind is what we know today as exacerbated separatist movements, terrorism, draconian laws, political assassinations and a polarized society.
However, this does not mean that Pakistan is doomed, division is in the offing and Pakistan being synonymous with predicament is chronic are mere illusions. Judicial activism, vibrant media, migration, remittances and electorate’s increased exposure to the outside world is slowly and gradually weakening the traditional power brokers.
What we need is for democracy to be given the time it lost to despotism. With democracy, Pakistan could become an upper-middle class country with high GDP growth and population enough to galvanize a change where the majority prefers policy over patronage. However, more hiccups in the ongoing democratic process would act as a last straw that could break camels back.
Salman Shah Jilani is a management sciences undergraduate and blogs at http://globaldaaira.wordpress.com.
Dear Ahsn,
You’ll be surprised that I do agree with what you said other than labeling Jinnah as “Secular” and many other past comments on same forum can help you to find out reasons.
Cheers.
I think that patience is the way to go. I have several friends in univeristy who are making an effort to educate people on how to eliminate intonerance to allow a purely democratic Pakistan
“Religion is True for the Common People, False for the Wise and Useful for the Rulers”
This classification of religion was proposed by a Roman philosopher Seneca the Younger (4 BC – 65 AD).
For any Believer his religion is true, no matter what is the ritual or what is the school of thought.. For every Muslim his belief is the True Islam.
A Sufi traces his own path to reach his God with or without inscribed prayers.
The Rulers (irrespective of race, colour and/or religion) had (and have) been using and abusing the religion, with or without the connivance of the religious leaders and scholars,
to rule the common people.
Pakistan is an Islamic Republic. This Islam is not the True Islam of the Common People nor the Liberal Islam of the Sufis. It is not the Islamic Republic of Maulana Maudoodi nor that of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
It is all the effort of The secular leaders (rulers) like Mr. Mohammad Ali Jinnah (father of the Islamic State) and Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto (father of the Islamic Constitution). Every other ruler has tried to put more and more (his/her) Islam in the governing system of Pakistan.
Dear Adnan, Now you will be raising your objection that it is not True Islam.
So what? Islam or no Islam, the country remains > Islamic Republic of Pakistan.<
Wish you all the best
AHsn
But it will be more and more an Islamic State where Allah will govern the Faithful through His representatives.
Long live the Islamic Democracy.
huh? Islam? Islamic Democracy? AHsn what are you talking about? Is it sarcasm or something else? I mean, I was not expecting this from you.
I agree that democracy needs patience. But the article seems written in a hurry and the logic does not always flow. It goes into lots of irrelevant an unconnected points.
Also, we need patience but we cannot make patience an excuse for bad performance. Because bad performance leads to publics low tolerance and that low tolerance leads to military governments.