Adil Najam
As reader zamanov has reminded us elsewhere, today marks Dr. Abdus Salam’s 10th death anniversary.
It should be a moment of deep reflection for all of us. He would have been as great a man as he was even if he did not won the Nobel Award in physics. But we would have conveniently forgotten him. That he did win the Nobel Award is a source of cosmetic and hollow pride for many Pakistanis. Cosmetic and hollow because it is also a source of visible unease. Even when we acknowledge that he was a great scientist (after all, the Nobel Committee thought so), we are uncomfortable acknowledging that he was a great man whose significance goes beyond his science.
As a brutally honest editorial in today’s Daily Times points out, “we are scared of honoring Dr. Salam.” We must not be.
The Daily Times editorial says all that needs to be said; it is worth reading, worth thinking about, and worth quoting in full:
The tragedy of our treatment of Dr Abdus Salam
Dr Abdus Salam (1926-1996) died ten years ago. He was the first Pakistani to get a Nobel Prize in 1979. But he might be the last if we continue to allow our state to evolve in a way that frightens the rest of the world. Our collective psyche runs more to accepted ‘wisdom’ than to scientific inquiry; and even if we were to display an uncharacteristic outcropping of individual genius the world may be so frightened of it that it might not give us our deserts.
We are scared of honouring Dr Salam because of our constitution which we have amended to declare his community as ‘non-Muslim’. When Dr Salam died in 1996 he had to be buried in Pakistan because he refused to give up his Pakistani nationality and acquire another that respected him more. But the Pakistani state was afraid of touching his dead body. He was therefore buried in Rabwa, the home town of his Ahmedi community whose name is also unacceptable to us and has been changed to Chenab Nagar by a state proclamation. But that was not the end of the story. After he was buried, the pious, law-abiding and constitution-loving people of Jhang, which is nearby, went over to Chenab Nagar to see if all had been done according to the constitutional provisions regarding the Ahmedi community to which he belonged.
And what did the constitution say? It said that the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or use any of the symbols of Islam. The original amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A Bhutto, a ‘liberal socialist-democrat’, and subsequent tightening of the law was done by the great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the civilians and the khakis had connived in the great betrayal of Dr Salam.
After the great scientist was buried in Chenab Nagar, his tombstone said “Abdus Salam the First Muslim Nobel Laureate”. Needless to say, the police arrived with a magistrate and rubbed off the ‘Muslim’ part of the katba. Now the tombstone says: Abdus Salam the First Nobel Laureate. The magistrate remained unfazed by what he had done but Dr Salam’s grave is actually the tombstone of a Muslim culture that Pakistan had inherited from the founder of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. But ironies fly thick in Pakistan. In Jhang, for example, where Dr Salam grew up as a precocious child, the schools that he endowed with scholarships and grants now teach communal hatred rather than the love that he had in mind when he gave them his money.
Meanwhile, the Ahmedi community is under daily pressure and anyone with a twisted mind is free to persecute them.
Abdus Salam was born in Jhang in 1926. At the age of 14, he got the highest marks ever recorded for the Matriculation Examination in Punjab. The whole town turned out to welcome him. He won a scholarship to Government College, Lahore, and took his MA in 1946. In the same year he was awarded a scholarship to St. John’s College, Cambridge, where he took a BA (honours) with a double First in mathematics and physics in 1949. In 1950 he received the Smith’s Prize from Cambridge University for the most outstanding pre-doctoral contribution to physics. He also obtained a PhD in theoretical physics at Cambridge; his thesis, published in 1951, contained fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics which had already gained him an international reputation.
In 1954 Dr Salam left his native country for a lectureship at Cambridge University. Before the Pakistani politicians apostatised him, he was a member of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, a member of the Scientific Commission of Pakistan and Chief Scientific Adviser to the President from 1961 to 1974. Pakistan’s space research agency Suparco was created by him and it is only symbolic that a group of Shia workers of Suparco were put to death in Karachi in 2004 by sectarian terrorists. Like Dr Salam, a lot of gifted Shia doctors have had to leave Pakistan because of the state’s twisted policies.
Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for General Zia who had “supplemented” the Second Amendment to the constitution with further comic disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to welcome the great scientist and had to be seen with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his government was already bristling, he took care to clip those sections of Dr Salam’s speech where he had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic expression. It was Dr Salam’s good luck that one of the believers did not go to court under Zia’s own laws to get the country’s only Nobel laureate sent to prison for six months of rigorous imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where he was received with great fanfare. He had gone there to simply meet his primary school mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and put it around the neck of his teacher.
Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago lest the government come under pressure to remove it from circulation. It is also true that his alma mater, Government College Lahore, now a university, has named certain ancillary departments and academic sessions after him following a long period of obscurantist domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty about what it has done to the greatest scientist it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the label of “rogue state” to Pakistan by selling the country’s nuclear technology for personal gain. Can we redeem ourselves by doing something in Dr Salam’s memory on this 10th anniversary of his passing that would please his soul and cleanse ours?
This is a link to the talk given by Pervez Hoodbhoy, professor of physics in Islamabad, at the Salam Memorial Meeting in Trieste, Italy. He made this speech in 1997 and it seems, it is still as relevant today as it was then.
Dr. Hoodbhoy wrote his impressions of the great man in an article called “ENCOUNTERS WITH SALAM”, which can be read on this link;
Abdus Salam: Past and Present
by Pervez Hoodbhoy (published in THE NEWS, 29 January, 1996)
can be read on this link;
It is a pity, that we/our nation cannot rise above our religious and political differences to honour a hero like, Dr. Salam.
In Dr. Hoodbhoy’s words,”Nothing hurt him more than the stony barrenness of the intellect in Islamic countries today. He was deeply mortified, he recalled, when a Nobel Prize winner in physics said to him: “Salam, do you really think we have an obligation to succour, aid, and keep alive those nations who have never created or added an iota to man’s stock of knowledge?”
Is there anything left to say, after reading the above thought?…I think not…atleast for me.
@Shahbaz: Mashallah all of you are educated and have access to libraries and Internet, you guys could always read the sources rather making political statments right here. One can always read “Roohany Khazaen” and other books. It’s not a difficult task. Anyone who claimed to a prophet and start a new belief can’t be declared as Muslim. Long time back some qadyani was arguing with me and I had made a small note about false prophecies given by mirza ghulam to refute him as a messiah.
I have no issue one follows islam or something else, as long as he/she is not being harmful for a society, he/she should be respected but claiming crap that Mullah declared a community ‘non-muslim’ is actually a sign of mental infertility. Qadyanis were declared non-muslims not only by Pakistan but other countries as well, that’s also true that many are returnig back to Islam and quitting that fragile belief. If I follow a religion then I should have enough courage to promote my religion in its true color rather disguise it as “Islam” or chiristianity etc.
@sadia: I don’t consider shia as kafir, in my knowledge, they didn’t declare some new prophet in the name of Islam.
@shahbaz: noone is ignoring their contribution but it’s not fair that if they’re contributing for a state then someone is free to do propaganda about certain community.
And for those who advocate to give rights to non-muslims in pakistan should read this article. One can always confirm about it. If this is true then it’s really shame for me as a member of a muslim state.
Infact a very nice post, thanks Adil. But discussion of all muslim and non muslim stuff has made me to wonder that though I am sunni muslim, lets say far from shia, qadiyani, ismaili and many more….does it make me good muslim or good citizen??? I think we should leave the stuff called muslim and kafir and try to respect the humanity. We have enough sectarien fights and many innocent people die every year in these conflicts. Atleast the educated class of our country should think differently, then we can hope that one day everybody will live in peace.
I am glad that you have taken the initiative of reviving the memory of Dr. Abdus Salam. Dr. Salam is the greatest Scientific mind that the Indus Valley (peesent Pakistan) has ever produced. Such a brilliant son of the soil was indeed badly treated by his country. No matter, he was a Muslim or not, he was very religious person. He never hid his religion and never hesitated to talk of Islam in International Scientific Conferences. I remember, in the Summer of 1987, in Istambul (Turkey), during an Internation Physics Conference he started his Inaugral Speech with an Ayet from the Holy Book.
Basically, it does not matter if he was either Muslim or not. He had his Faith, but he himself was beyond any Faith because he was a good “Human Being” or a “Perfect Man” which we also translate as “mard-e-kaamil”.
I insist that for Dr. Salam the word “man” be written “mard” in Urdu and not merde as in “merde Haq” for Zia-ul-Haq. In Frnch merde means shit!
Ahsan
I think we need to adopt a more balanced approach here. I have little doubt that the beliefs of Qadianies are false enough and preposterous enough to declare them non-Muslims. But on the other hand, I do believe that General Zia-ul-Haq in particular and our society in general went too far in its opposition to the Qadianies. Remember that 1973 constitution simply declares them non-Muslims; it does not restrict their religious practices. It was done under a 1984 Presidential ordinance issued by Zia. (These restrictions have deemed any religious practices in public by Qadianies illegal, as mentioned in this discussion earlier). My personal opinion is that declaring Qadianies non-Muslim, in the constitution is enough; the restrictions on their religious practices are against the Quranic teachings that preach “no compulsion in religion in Islam�. After all, other minorities are allowed to practice their religion with complete freedom. Qadianies are living under enormous social and political pressure in Pakistan. And let’s face it; some ignorant people have been insulting Dr. Salam - the greatest Pakistani scientist of all times. And the society and government have done a very poor job in acknowledging Dr. Salam’s true contribution. Let’s not forget that Qadianies like Sir Zafarullah Khan have contributed to Tehreek-e-Pakistan and the development of Pakistan a great deal. It is time for us to approach the issue of Qadiani religion with open mindedness. Yes, they are non-Muslims, but they are Pakistanies, and they deserve applause and respect for their contributions.
Salam’s history in academia is a beacon of light to most, if not all, Pakistani scientists around the world. I am yet to find a serious scientist who would not (a) have utmost respect for his academic work and his love for Pakistan, and (b) would disagree that he was squarely denied respect by his own people.
I never met Salam, the only Nobel Laureate of Pakistan. But the stories of disrespect I have heard, including some in the post above, make me sad and alienated from whoever those Pakistanis were who judged him and his religion. I traveled to Mexico with the only Nobel laureate they have and saw the love they shower on him. He was not just respected for being a good scientist, but for providing hope and becoming an ideal for young kids in school to aspire to. What about our kids? Do we tell them enough about Salam (or even Al-Khwarizmi) so they get the inspiration to do scientific research? Salam is no less than Einstein and it is sad that most kids in Pakistani schools would recognize Einstein but not their very own Salam.
[quote post=”431″]ill minded religious discussion.[/quote]
That’s demonstration of hypocrisy by you.
[quote post=”431″]Dr. Qadir stole blue prints from the dutch[/quote]
You’re ignorant enough. WHo talked about Qadir Khan? and speaking of Qadir khan and strealing of tech, who doesn’t stole it? India stole it, Korea stole it, what’s wrong if Pakistan stole it? The irony is that current Pakistani ARmy is being fed by same stolen technology, deal with it!
[quote post=”431″]I would have more respect for so called non Muslim who was patriotic and genuine in the work of electroweak theory.[/quote]
Who is disrespecting him?
On science and scientists, as has been said, Salam was a great scientist and would have been great even if he had not won the Nobel Prize. Dr. Salimuzzaman Siddique was certainly also a great scientist, even though he did not win the Nobel, but could very well have. Attaur Rahman is NOT and Qadeer Khan is NOT. At best their skills are ‘adminsitrative’ and there are no great theories, concepts or breakthroughs in knowledge that they have made.