‘Operation Silence’ Against Lal Masjid Islamabad

Posted on July 3, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, Politics, Religion
369 Comments
Total Views: 179037

Adil Najam

UPDATE: Reports in the Pakistan media suggest that the Lal Masjid leader has finally been arrested while trying to escape wearing a burqa. According to a BBC update:

The leader of a radical mosque besieged by Pakistani security forces in Islamabad has been caught trying to escape wearing a woman’s burqa. Security forces seized Abdul Aziz as he tried to leave the Red Mosque amid a crowd of women… He was wearing a burqa that also covered his eyes,” a security official told the AFP news agency about the cleric’s escape bid. “Our men spotted his unusual demeanour. The rest of the girls looked like girls, but he was taller and had a pot belly.

ORIGINAL POST: Things are moving fast and the showdown at Lal Masjid, Islamabad that began this morning is now ready to turn into an even more real battle. The day took the lives of at least 10 people, possibly more. These included policemen, soldiers, by-standers, a journalist, and a number of Madrassah students. (For details see our earlier post and update comments on it, here).

The latest – and this keeps changing by the minute – is that in a mid-night press conference the government has given an ultimatum to the management of the Lal Masjid (Red Mosque) to surrender. There is no indication that they will. In the past things have always ended with ‘negotiated settlements.’ This time the likelihood of this happening is much less. A curfew has been imposed in the area. Tanks have been called in. So have special forces.


Your Ad Here

Metroblog Islamabad is doing a wonderful job of keeping abreast with breaking news. It reports, through Dawn TV, that 111 Brigade (Army) from Rawalpindi has already assembled around the mosque. Ambulances have been fully stocked. Hospitals are on alert. An ultimatum for time has been given (3.30 PST… NOW!). The entire area has been cordoned off.

Here is a news clip from ARYOne, broadcast earlier.

In an article written last week for The News, I had argued that inaction was not a solution and because of so many delays and policies of apeasement some confrontation was now becoming inevitable.

This episode [i.e., the Chinese massage parlor case] will further embolden the already violence-prone brigands at the two madressahs and we are likely to see an escalation in their demands as well as their tactics. Meanwhile, the government has once again demonstrated an inability and/or unwillingness to act decisively. The much-cherished ‘writ of the state’ continues to rot in tatters.

This, it seems, is what happened when earlier the Lal Masjid management incited this escalation in response to the government’s build-up of force around the mosque. In that article, I had gone on to argue that:

Just like standing still in the middle of the road at the sight of the blinding lights of a truck speeding towards it does not save the life of the stunned deer, doing nothing about this escalating crisis out of fear that doing anything will only make things worse is not going to help the government, or Pakistan. Something needs to be done, and done fast.

I had called in the article for the government to “act to judiciously dismantle militancy at Lal Masjid.” This situation has to be responded to. But the key word remains “act judiciously.” What is really important is how that action is taken. Further bloodshed should be avoided. At least minimized. One hopes that any action is intelligent action and all steps are taken to minimize loss of life. Not just because one does not wish to create needless ‘martyrs.’ Much more so because all life – and everyone’s life – is precious.

The technologies to undertake low casualty offensives are available. The will and sagacity to do so is needed. The test for the government – acting with force in the very center of the Federal Capital – is not only what it does, but how it does it.

Photo credit: Associated Press, B.K. Bangash.

369 responses to “‘Operation Silence’ Against Lal Masjid Islamabad”

  1. tina says:

    I think you are young, Naseem….there are no utopias. Attempts to create them have throughout history ended in unspeakable horror. Always, always, always.

  2. ayesha sajid says:

    Faraz , you say ……. “I dont see how such a freedom of expression is possible under Sharia.”

    would it not be more appropriate to say that it would not be possible to have such a freedom of expression and might i add tolerance under THIER version of the Shariah ?

  3. faraz says:

    Well Naseem the way I see Sharia is hegemony of one school of thoughts on others. Let me ask you a question. Why reformers like Allama Iqbal and Sir Syed were born in english era and we dont see any great reformer after Pakistan?

    The reason is without competition you dont work to improve your product. This principle applies in “free market economy” as well as it works in “market of ideas”. You need to allow a healthy but decent debate for society to evolve intellctaully.

    Our Ullemas threatened Rushdi with death threat because they did not knew how to respond differently. I have no problem with society becoming religious as long as you give poeple other choices. I dont see how such a freedom of expression is possible under Sharia.

  4. Aqil Sajjad says:

    Nice to hear NS talking sense on the issue instead of mindlessly siding with lal masjid to get cheep political milage.
    He says that noone should be allowed to run a state within a state and the lal masjid brothers should be tried.

  5. Aqil Sajjad says:

    So Abdul Rasheed Ghazi is trying to negotiate a surrender such that he won’t be arrested and tried for any crimes. The govt is asking for an unconditional surrender.
    This is basically the main hurdle, the coward, after all the talk of shahadat and putting so many lives in danger, is more interested in saving his own backside rather than making sure that these lives can be saved. He would rather have all of them fight till death so that he can be spared the disgrace of being arrested.
    This is what you call hypocrisy of the highest order.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*