‘Operation Silence’ Against Lal Masjid Islamabad

Posted on July 3, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, Politics, Religion
362 Comments
Total Views: 159279

Adil Najam

UPDATE: Reports in the Pakistan media suggest that the Lal Masjid leader has finally been arrested while trying to escape wearing a burqa. According to a BBC update:

The leader of a radical mosque besieged by Pakistani security forces in Islamabad has been caught trying to escape wearing a woman’s burqa. Security forces seized Abdul Aziz as he tried to leave the Red Mosque amid a crowd of women… He was wearing a burqa that also covered his eyes,” a security official told the AFP news agency about the cleric’s escape bid. “Our men spotted his unusual demeanour. The rest of the girls looked like girls, but he was taller and had a pot belly.

ORIGINAL POST: Things are moving fast and the showdown at Lal Masjid, Islamabad that began this morning is now ready to turn into an even more real battle. The day took the lives of at least 10 people, possibly more. These included policemen, soldiers, by-standers, a journalist, and a number of Madrassah students. (For details see our earlier post and update comments on it, here).

The latest – and this keeps changing by the minute – is that in a mid-night press conference the government has given an ultimatum to the management of the Lal Masjid (Red Mosque) to surrender. There is no indication that they will. In the past things have always ended with ‘negotiated settlements.’ This time the likelihood of this happening is much less. A curfew has been imposed in the area. Tanks have been called in. So have special forces.


Your Ad Here

Metroblog Islamabad is doing a wonderful job of keeping abreast with breaking news. It reports, through Dawn TV, that 111 Brigade (Army) from Rawalpindi has already assembled around the mosque. Ambulances have been fully stocked. Hospitals are on alert. An ultimatum for time has been given (3.30 PST… NOW!). The entire area has been cordoned off.

Here is a news clip from ARYOne, broadcast earlier.

In an article written last week for The News, I had argued that inaction was not a solution and because of so many delays and policies of apeasement some confrontation was now becoming inevitable.

This episode [i.e., the Chinese massage parlor case] will further embolden the already violence-prone brigands at the two madressahs and we are likely to see an escalation in their demands as well as their tactics. Meanwhile, the government has once again demonstrated an inability and/or unwillingness to act decisively. The much-cherished ‘writ of the state’ continues to rot in tatters.

This, it seems, is what happened when earlier the Lal Masjid management incited this escalation in response to the government’s build-up of force around the mosque. In that article, I had gone on to argue that:

Just like standing still in the middle of the road at the sight of the blinding lights of a truck speeding towards it does not save the life of the stunned deer, doing nothing about this escalating crisis out of fear that doing anything will only make things worse is not going to help the government, or Pakistan. Something needs to be done, and done fast.

I had called in the article for the government to “act to judiciously dismantle militancy at Lal Masjid.” This situation has to be responded to. But the key word remains “act judiciously.” What is really important is how that action is taken. Further bloodshed should be avoided. At least minimized. One hopes that any action is intelligent action and all steps are taken to minimize loss of life. Not just because one does not wish to create needless ‘martyrs.’ Much more so because all life – and everyone’s life – is precious.

The technologies to undertake low casualty offensives are available. The will and sagacity to do so is needed. The test for the government – acting with force in the very center of the Federal Capital – is not only what it does, but how it does it.

Photo credit: Associated Press, B.K. Bangash.

362 responses to “‘Operation Silence’ Against Lal Masjid Islamabad”

  1. Shiraz says:

    Religion should be taken out of any government. Time and again, it was shown that people use religion for satisfying their own needs. Keep religion between you and God. HE will understand. I mean are people saying that Muslims in USA and other secular countries are LESS or MORE Muslims than Muslims in Pakistan ?

    Reza Aslan, (rezaaslan.org), renowned sholar and Author of No God but God, spoke to us and mentioned that reformation in Islam is happening. He said you will see various versions of Islam, Pakistani, American, Canadian etc. The reason is that youth now a days dont rely on clerics or molvis, they can interpret Quran, Sharia, Sunnah and understand what they want to..

    He said it is not good or bad..it is inevitable.

    So as Kama Ata Turk gave power of Ottoman Empire to THE PEOPLE OF TURKEY…the caliphate ended there..I think we should keep it there..

  2. Naseem says:

    Assalamau Laikum Tina, Faraz

    I am not so young…and I know there utopias are near enough impossible…but I also know that few peoples really try to really call Allah’s SWT blessings..of humality, love and charity.

    Faraz says “I dont see how such a freedom of expression is possible under Sharia”.

    Sharia is not about freedom of expression …it is about the expression of Allah SWT for us muslims …and should equate to the same thing as freedom for us.

    By questioning the need for sharia, you are questioning the edict for muslims…you are questioning the ultimate…the identity of being a muslim….i.e. the unquestioning loyalty to the Koran…the literal words of Allah SWT.

    Forgive me I do not want to put you on the spot, and in no way do I want to be seen as a trouble maker…but I must now ask the question “You are not questioning these literal words of our Lord are you”?

  3. Akif Nizam says:

    Naseem, instead of a lot of non-specific claims, can you specify maybe five points that can be implemented by a “human” society (as oppossed to that of angels) in its quest for Sharia? Let’s say you are given unlimited power in Pakistan to impose the “real” Sharia, what will you do?

  4. faraz says:

    I think it is a “philosphical” debate.

    Well just think that you believe in set of axioms which you think as universal truth. Why in the world you will allow set of axioms which you think as false and evil to progress?

    For example “earth revolves around sun”. Will you allow the axioms “Sun revolves around moon” to be teach in school.

    Religion sees world in balck and white. It is simplistic view of reality.

    Religion is sill an important institute as it is a way to God but after enlightement of 17th century it should be taken spritually rather literally.

  5. baber says:

    “Can you not see that in a society where social problems are endemic, Sharia frees humanity to realise its individual potential, in this regard Pak would benefit very much from Sharia.”

    Societies where their are less social problems have evolved without shariat. Its a matter of ethics which comes with good education doesn’t really need to be religious.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*