Pakistan Opposition Meets in London Amidst Challenges

Posted on July 6, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Politics
Total Views: 38917

Adil Najam

I was going to use the term APC – All Parties Conference – in the headline but just realized that Dawn is now using the term MPC – Multi-Party Conference – to describe the meeting of opposition parties which is to begin in London within a few hours.

This is not just a semantic issue, it highlights one of the many challenges faced by this very important meeting which was already postponed once and will now be held under the shadow of the ongoing Lal Masjid operation in Islamabad.

An editorial in The Nation, lays out some of the key challenges.

DESPITE the diversion created by the Lal Masjid operation, many in Pakistan are keenly waiting for the outcome of the two-day APC convened by Mian Nawaz Sharif in London. Besides the ARD and MMA it is being attended by the nationalist parties and minority representatives. While Ms Bhutto has declined to attend the meeting despite being in London, she will be represented by a PPP delegation led by Makhdoom Amin Fahim. A committee of PML-N and PPP leaders has reportedly finalised the joint document to be issued at the end of the conference. This is likely to underline commonly agreed points like the restoration of the 1973 constitution as it existed prior to the military take over on October 12, 1999, formation of an interim set up and a neutral Election Commission in consultation with the opposition, an independent judiciary and the return of the exiled leaders.

What remains to be seen is how the participants resolve some of the issues and overcome suspicions that continue to divide them. The MMA has accused Ms Bhutto of trying to broker a power sharing deal with General Musharraf. The PPP, on the other hand, has challenged the religious alliance to resign from the Balochistan cabinet to prove its credentials as an opposition party. The nationalist parties accuse the others of ignoring the key issue of autonomy and want ironclad guarantees on it, while on their way to London, some of the MMA leaders have again condemned the PPP leadership in a veiled manner. To pre-empt criticism by the sort, Makhdoom Amin Fahim categorically ruled out on the eve of the APC any possibility of understanding with General Musharraf. He also maintained that the party would abide by all decisions taken by the APC with consensus.

Those participating in the APC hope to produce an action plan to remove Gen. Musharraf. It is here that the opposition stands badly divided. The PPP disagrees with the proposal to resign from the Assemblies in case the President was to seek election from them. Similarly, it insists on taking part in elections even if they are held under him. Most of the opposition parties, however, take a different stand on the issue. They also favour initiating a countrywide movement to remove the government. The PPP, on the other hand, maintains that nothing should be done to provide an excuse to the government to impose emergency and postpone the elections. Unless the opposition leaders devise an agreed action plan, and the exiled leaders announce a final date of their return, the APC is likely to be considered an uninspiring exercise.

Lets explore some of these points.

Much is, of course, being made of the timing of the Lal Masjid operation and how it might divert diverts attention from this meeting of the opposition. The timing is, indeed, suspicious. But then, given the state of current Pakistan politics, just about any timing would have been suspicious given that the government had let the Lal Masjid militancy brew for so long. The head of the Alliance for Restoration of Democracy (ARD), Makhdoom Amin Fahim of PPP believes that the timing will affect the APC but is probably not a conspiracy.

Indeed, the distraction – which is very real – may well be the least of the challenges that the assembled leaders will have to face and resolve. The meeting has already been postponed once (in March, because of the Chief Justice issue) and postponing it again woudl not have been well-received. However, the real significance of the Lal Masjid operation is NOT the distraction, it is the very real differences amongst the assembled parties that it brings to fore. The issue is whether they can agree on dealing with religious extremism. It is not at all clear that they can; nor is it clear how their constituencies will react if they do. Tactically, the best approach for them would be unite against the ‘way the operation was carried out’ (on which they can agree) rather than to try to find a consensus on their views about the Lal Masjid and its leadership (on which they may not be able to agree).

There are also other significant differences within the opposition parties. The only thing that binds them is a desire to oust the Musharraf government, and even on that they seem unsure. Benazir Bhutto is refusing to attend even though she is in London right now. She argues that MMA is not really an opposition party because it is a government partner in two provinces. MMA for its part has raised the issue of whether there are any ‘deals’ between Benazir Bhutto and Pervaiz Musharraf. It has also been argued that if she can ‘talk’ to the government she should also be able to ‘talk’ to MMA. This rift and these mutual doubts are serious but will not be show stoppers, PPP will be represented but not by Benazir Bhutto. If steered rightly, the meeting will focus on what they can agree on rather than what they disagree on.

The real momentum behind the meeting comes from the Lawyers’ Movement in support of the Chief Justice. Till now the opposition parties have, literally, held on the coat tails of the lawyers who are clearly the leaders of this movement. The political reality is that it is the lawyers and not any political party that has captured the public imagination on this issue; not yet. But on the issue of the restoration of the institutional integrity of the judiciary, the parties do agree. The success of this London meeting will depend in great extent of whether they can build on this agreement to craft agreement on other issues, especially on the issue of the uniform and the next election.

And the next election, including the uniform issue, is really what this meeting is really about. The success of this meeting will – and should – be judged by whether the opposition parties can agree on a clear and united strategy on these issues. It is far from clear whether they can. They all have stated a public support for democracy, an opposition to the future of the presidency in uniform, and to transparent elections. However, too many Pakistanis doubt the level of their commitment. The real challenge before the leaders assembling in London is to convince Pakistanis that such doubts are unfounded.

Will this meeting be able to demonstrate resoundly that such commitment actually exists? Will the parties be able to arrive at and state clearly a common position and a clear strategy on these issues? Will they be able to excite the public and convince them that the parties goal is not simply to get back to power but a deep and real commitment to democracy?

If the meeting is able to do so, it will indeed be historic. If not, it will soon be forgotten; and not because of the Lal Masjid distraction.

55 responses to “Pakistan Opposition Meets in London Amidst Challenges”

  1. Fruad of Rs. 20 Crore has been committed in 5 Ismailia Reg. Credit Societies situated in Prince Aly Road J. K Area, Hyd, Sindh running under the name of Pr.K A. Khan by group of rich fruady fellows of Iamailia Community in June 2005. By above fruad 300 to 400 depositers 80% of Ismailies including Orhans, Widows, Old People,Special Persons & Pensioners of Hyd city & surroundings have been effected worstly, bcz they have been depending on mark-up so received monthly OR quarterly. Beside societies Viz.1. Aliabad 2. Al-Rahim .3.Hyd. Multi Purpose .4. Women M.P, who have been depositing their amounts with (5) Mubarak Cr.S, being Principal Society have seized due to it. All poor depositers including great No. of non-Community depositers r passing worst time since about 6 yrs. Now only way is to request in your kind honour to solve our problem 4 early return of Principle amount & including Up- to- date mark- up. from H. Sajid Khuwaja, Sc. Tchr, Govt. N. M. H. Skl, Hyd.

  2. Some people seemed confused with Imran’s move to stand alongside people like Qazi Hussain and Nawaz Shareef, great leaders stand for the motif, not the people behind it. He supported the military takeover in failing Pakistan but as soon as this military diverted from its promised tracks, he also sidelined these traitors (aka elitists) BUT he never sidelined the motif. Still doesnot.

    The reason it is in London is because Nawaz Sharif and BB can’t enter Pakistan just yet, its really clear now why BB didnt attend the conference and as someone rightly said, the clowns of PPP were there, (esp. Sheri Sheri lady), I certainly don’t think PPP has anything to do with liberalism or any shism, they are just wadera backed political goons, ask a Sindhi whose people have died in struggles against the Waderas (aka PPP), who were first backed by ML during Jinnah days, PPP has literally shunned any people empowerment in interior Sindh.

    Imran Khan is truly focused, he knows what to do, he aint Musharraf who is a one man show, Imran has the knack to take the whole team along, although I agree PTI seems Imran-only so far but things r changing especially after 12th May. PTI will emerge very strong in 2008 onwards…

  3. Kruman says:

    One man who’d have made a difference

    Aitzaz Ahsan. He is uniquely positioned in Pakistani politics right now. Heading the CJP defense, author of charter of democracy, I think he has even represented Nawa Sharif in his trial in 99.

    He would have had a bigger impact on the coference than even his leader BB, had she been present.

  4. Viqar Minai says:

    “But for mass mobilization to happen through out the country and amongst all sections of the populace would require a bit more than the legal eagles.

    Unfortunately, at this juncture, there is dearth of any credible political leader who can step to the challenge and bring mass mobilization”.

    If there is one thing that the CJP episode has distinctly demonstrated, it is that a genuine movement can be started without there being a credible political leadership in place in the system. It may seem like a tall claim, but an honest and dedicated legal community, spearheaded by a determined supreme court, is sufficient to stir the pot in the right direction.

    I believe I can make a pretty good case that a sustained mass movement to achieve a more just society can be initiated, and sustained as long as necessary, PROVIDED:

    1) as stated above there exists an honest and dedicated legal system, and

    2) the people of a nation are sincere, and willing to struggle, for a just society.

    In the absence of either of the above ingredients, everything else amounts to nothing more than fluff and making excuses. This has been our fate up to this point since Pakistan came into being.

    Judging from the tone and thinking, as reflected in the posts in just about any online forum I have encountered, doing that will be both presumptous as well as amount to little more than “bhaiNs ke AagE bIn bajAna.

    As a matter of courtesy and respect to others, I shall mind my own business. Pakistan is now in the hands of its younger generation. They will make of it what they will, and will deserve the fruit of their labor (or lack of it) just as the current and the previous generations have thus far.

    After all, what can one add to the last words of a dying quaid-e-millat: “May Allah(SWT) Protect Pakistan”?

  5. observer says:

    The APC is more or less a joke. The fact that it is in London and not in Pakistan, in my view, goes against the whole grass-roots democractic philosophy. It looks more like a chance to escape the heat and power breakdowns of Pakistan–and now prolonging the stay–and no specifics–what can one expect from these jokers–I watched ARY and felt like it was an episode of dumb and dumber.

    Please note you all that the better minds from the PPP–people like Aitzaz Ahsan and Reza Rabani were notably absent. Some sources say that Benazir did not allow them to come–preferring to send people who either have no political standing (like Sherry Rehman and owes her woman’s seat to Benazir) or people like Amin Fahim, who is clearly not that bright.

    In my view, the real opposition is in Pakistan–people from the PPP who may be smarter and dare to question Benazir and truly stand for liberal policies, have vote banks and support in the people and who did not waste their time with the APC. Imran Khan appears unfocused and too close to the mullahs–besides he does not have a team so he’s just a maverick in the whole plot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *