Adil Najam
THIS POLL IS NOW CLOSED.
With Gen. Pervez Musharraf visiting the United States to address the UN General Assembly and launch his autobiography, In the Line of Fire, (see ATP post here) those of us living in USA are bound hear and see more of him on the media that we normally do.
Seems like an appropriate time for an ATP Poll. Previous ATP Polls have sought our readers views on women’s rights and Pakistan’s image (here), on what Gen. Musharraf should do about his future (here), and on which of Pakistan’s past leaders did the most ‘good’ for the country (here). This time we want you, our readers, to do a performance review of Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s years in power. How would you grade Gen. Musharraf’s performance in four key areas: (a) domestic politics, (b) economy and development, (c) governance and reform, and (d) foreign affairs?
In each of these four areas, you can give General Sahib a grade; ranging from the highest at A+ to the lowest at F. Following standard practice in academic grading, an A signifies ‘excellent’ performance, a B signifies ‘Good’, a C signifies ‘average’, a D signifies ‘Poor’, and an F is failing grade. Simply fill in the grades in the form below or click here to take the survey:
The intended focus of the poll is on Gen. Musharraf’s actual performance. We would love to base your assessment on what he has actually achieved, or not, in the context of the goals he and others had set for him in each of these areas. The four areas are broad, but hopefully they are conceptually cohesive. The first three encapsulate all the elements of the 7-point agenda that Gen. Musharraf has set for himself (see here):
1. Rebuild National confidence and morale.
2. Strengthen Federation, remove Inter-Provincial disharmony and restore National cohesion… through devolution of power, from the Centre to the Provinces and from the Provincial to the local governments as actually enshrined in the Constitution.
3. Devolution of power to the grass root level.
4. Revive Economy and restore Investor confidence… through stability and consistency in economic policies and economic security.
5. Ensure law and order and dispense speedy justice… improving the qualities of law enforcement agencies.
6. Depoliticize State institutions.
7. Ensure swift and across the board accountability… The process of accountability is being directed at those guilty of plundering and looting the National wealth, tax evaders […and…] loan defaulters. The process of accountability will be transparent for the public to see.
It seems to me that the first point arrives from a sum of all four of our categories. Point 4 is clearly about our ‘Economy and Development’ category. Points 2 and 3 are generally included in what we are calling ‘Domestic Politics’. And Points 5, 6 and 7 are relate closely to our category of ‘Governance and Reform.’ I felt that having a separate point of foreign affairs was important given the events of the last many years and Pakistan’s role in them. You are, of course, free to comprehend the four categories as you deem best.
A request to our readers. I have put in some effort into selecting four separate categories for assessment (moreover, I have gone through many technical hoops to get the poll to accept multiple questions). I hope you will all take the time to evaluate his performance in each category on its own merit and do so as objectively as possible.
At one level, it does not matter much; after all, this is just a silly little poll whose only real utility is our own intellectual stimulation. On the other hand, I worry about a tendency amongst some to gravitate towards extremes, to view things as entirely black or entirely white (the ‘with us or against us’ mentality), to label things as either entirely good or as entirely evil, and to viciously attack any and all who disagree. I fear that the temptation will be too great amongst Musharraf’s supporters to put all A+’s and for his detractors to put in all F’s. If you honestly believe that to be the true assessment in each category, please do so. But I hope you will not do so simply for the sake of wanting to ‘force’ one particular result or the other.
If you do want to influence the results, please, by all means ask your friends to also vote. Voting is anonymous; as it should be. This is, of course, not be a very scientific poll, but it will at least give us a sense of what this community � the ATP cohort � thinks. Do vote, but please vote only once (even if you are smart enough to beat the system somehow). This poll is now closed.
Folks, just to keep people in the loop on this. As of now, a total of 87 votes have been cast:
DOMESTIC POLITICS
A (8); A(3); A-(2)
B (6); B(3); B-(3)
C (8); C(7); C-(4)
D (2); D(6); D-(5)
F(30)
ECONOMY & DEVELOPMENT
A (18); A(10); A-(8)
B (15); B(14); B-(1)
C (6); C-(1)
D (1); D(1); D-(1)
F(11)
GOVERNANCE & REFORM
A (7); A(2); A-(9)
B (9); B(7); B-(6)
C (3); C(8); C-(3)
D (3); D(5); D-(4)
F(21)
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
A (20); A(14); A-(11)
B (5); B(5); B-(3)
C (7); C(1)
D (2); D(1); D-(1)
F(17)
As reported in DAWN today,
http://www.dawn.com/2006/09/20/top6.htm
[quote post=”309″]US helicopters intrude into N. Waziristan[/quote]
Despite his tough-talking foreign-dignitary-hand-shaking attitude, this event highlights just how much inroads most-allied-ally has made in foreign affairs. Last year it was a missile attack by Americans on our soil (vehemently denied by Sherpao and Sheikh Rasheed despite obvious evidence to the contrary) and now helicopter gunship attacks. Lets see how our government’s-writ-extender reacts to this in USA.
We may not like that present government has signed a contract with N. Waziristan tribes. But an agreement is an agreement and should be adhered to.
If those tribes assume that US army attacked with the approval of Musharraf this can escalate into another war. Earlier one has already cost Pakistan Army more than few thousand soldiers fighting against their own countrymen.
I can hold my F grade in foreign affairs since we are again making claims of progress with India, but if history is anything to go by, any agreement will not be long lasting.
Adil, your explanation would suffice. Please don’t make me surf looking for Musharraf’s picture on the web; it’s the last thing I would want to do.:)
Bilal,
You are right. I think it is an interesting part of journalism today and happens pretty much every where. (I am certain now that Adil didn’t indulge in what I had “assumed”). How many CLOSEups of Zaheer or Inzamam do you recall seeing in the recent saga on bbc or cricinfo. I think picture in itself makes up the villain or the hero regardless of the related story and it is a useful tool to convey the message.
Adnan,
You have raised an interesting point, even though I don’t think my vote was swayed by this particular choice of photographs.
How are leaders get portrayed in media pictures etc does have a big influence on how a society shapes its expectations from them. For example Nawaz Sharif was often seen inaugurating new industries, bridges, highways; Benazir was seen showing up at villages and at shrines etc; and Musharraf is shown shaking hands with foreign dignitaries or as a strong international business/tough talking military guy.
Dear Adnan Ahmad, I hope the pictures I used with the post have not swayed anyone’s votes one way or the other. That was certainly not the intention. The one on the top is from the Wall Street Journal and was used about a year or more ago, if I recall right, in a front page article that was fairly complimentary to Gen. Musharraf. I used it purely for aesthetic reasons (I like pencil drawings and since we usually have photographs, I thought this might be good; plus he has a thoughtful look in the portrayed). The second picture is one I have used on ATP before. Irrespective of what you think of the subject, I like it simply for its photographic merits and framing. Since I was using 2 pictures it felt fair to have one in military and one in civilian clothes, since he wears each type with equal frequency.
Anyhow, since you do think it is somehow leading, I will be very happy to replace it. Do send me your alternative choice (if you send me a URL of any picture that’s on the web, we should be able to work from there). Alternatively, I can swap teh two pictures and bring the other one to the top. As I said, I hope my picture choice is in no way influencing anyone’s vote.