(UPDATE: You can view this movie here).
Shaib Mansoor’s feature film Khuda Kay Liye: In The Name of God is to be released in Pakistan on July 20, 2007. There is great buzz about it; as there should be.
Regular readers know how much respect, even reverance, I have for Shoaib’s work. For me he is one of the single most talented Pakistanis I have ever had the pleasure of knowing.
Indeed, one of the single most talented Pakistanis ever.
As we have written before, he may also be the single most under-rated Pakistani artist, since his contribution to TV music, to TV drama, to TV comedy, TV stage shows and to popular music remains unknown to many; too many.
I have not seen the movie myself yet and have been hearing about it from a number of people – including some directly involved – for quite some while. The promo clips are now available on YouTube and – no surprise – the quality of cinematography, of artistic composition, of music, of attention to detail all look great. Typical Shoaib Mansoor. Of course, how the whole package comes across remains to be seen. This is, of course, his first feature film but he is already a master of each of the genres in a movie and his long plays (like Alpha, Bravo, Charlie) must have trained him well for this.
![]()
To me, of course, the story is Shoaib Mansoor. For others, however, there are other draws. The cast includes Lollywood superstar Shaan, Bollywood maestro Naseeruddin Shah, Iman Ali (who is PTV’s Abid Ali’s daughter and was in Shoaib’s Anarkali music video), and other notables. But the real story here is the story. Or, rather, the topic of the story.






The film has a wonderful and wonderfully rich website, and according to the synopsis posted there:
The film is about the difficult situation in which the Pakistanis in particular and the Muslims in general are caught up since 9/11. There is a war going on between the Fundamentalists and the Liberal Muslims. This situation is creating a drift not only between the Western world and the Muslims, but also within the Muslims. The educated and modern Muslims are in a difficult situation because of their approach towards life and their western attire. They are criticized and harassed by the fundamentalists and on the other hand the Western world sees them as potential suspects of terrorism just because of their Muslim names. This paradox is resulting in great suffering for a forward looking Muslim.
This paradox of the divided society is, of course, a constant theme of ATP too. It is always a controversial subject here and will be much much more controversial for Khuda Kay Liye. It is, despite the controversy, a topic that we as a society have to confront. Thoughtfully and seriously. Since I have not seen the movie I cannot say how he has treated the subject, but based on his track record if there is anyone who has the ability to deal with this difficult issue sensitively and without turning things into slogans, it is Shoaib Mansoor. All the more reason to watch the movie and refrain from judging it in advance.
![]()
But there is another important angle to this too. GEO is promoting the movie as a ‘revival’ of Pakistan cinema. As a long time fan of Pakistani cinema, I certainly hope it is. Again, if anyone can do this, Shoaib Mansoor can.
I saw a post today in Metroblog Lahore that made me think that he just might. It was not about this movie, but about a new very modern movie house opening in Lahore. I have long believed that the reason Pakistani cinema declined is not just because of the movies, but also because of the state of movie houses. Well, this new theatre – the DHA Cinema – is quite something.


With tickets at Rs. 250 and Rs. 500 it may be pricy, but from the pictures at the site, it is clearly something that could attract a lot of people simply for the theatre experience. Interestingly, this theater also opens on July 20, and one of the movies it is opening with is Khuda Kay Liye. Coincidence? Probably not.
I must confess that I have been planning to write this post for nearly two weeks now. I had originally thought of calling it something like ‘The Other Lal Masjid Story’ simply because Abdul Rashid Ghazi had taken an interest in this movie. According to Daily Times (July 3, 2007):
Lal Masjid has demanded a ban on a yet-to-be released movie, Khuda Kay Liye, declaring it blasphemous… “The film is against Islamic norms and traditions and is being released on a private TV channel without prior approval from a censor board. We won’t allow this,â€? said Abdul Rashid Ghazi, the Lal Masjid deputy mullah, who did not mention his source of information about the movie. He said he would not object to the movie if ulema approved it. He demanded that the government form a board to review the film. “The government will be held responsible if the film is released without being censored,â€? he said.
I had not understood then, nor understand now, whether his source of objection was the subject matter, the fact that it has an Indian actor in it, or a statement of support for the Censor Board. I guess we will never really know. I do know, however, that it is bound to be controversial for same for at least two of those reasons. As for myself, I will reserve my judgement until after I see the movie. But anything from Shoaib Mansoor, and anything on this subject, I do want to see.

Lal Masjid has demanded a ban on a yet-to-be released movie, Khuda Kay Liye, declaring it blasphemous… “The film is against Islamic norms and traditions and is being released on a private TV channel without prior approval from a censor board. We won’t allow this,â€? said Abdul Rashid Ghazi, the Lal Masjid deputy mullah, who did not mention his source of information about the movie. He said he would not object to the movie if ulema approved it. He demanded that the government form a board to review the film. “The government will be held responsible if the film is released without being censored,â€? he said.


















































One just need to read Kasf-ul-Mahjoob by Ali Hejveri(RA), He has beautifully drawn the line b/w fake and real sufis and fake and real taswauff.
Shahbaz sb,if you didn’t find shoaib’s statment as a personal attack then what can I say, maybe you don’t feel it because your tinking is in synch with Mr.mansoor? that is “reject those who don’t speak our language” :-)
AA Ibrahim,
For Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal going to Bishr Hafi please read Tazkiratul Awliya by Fariduddin Attar. BTW there are sections on Imam-e Aazam, Imam Shafi and Imam Hanbal in that book too as sufis respect all scholars. I think it will be an eye opener. If you can read Urdu try to get an urdu translation, english translations are not good enough.
Yes, Ghausul Aazam (RA) followed Imam Hanbal (RA) in fiqh and Hazrat Junaid Baghdadi’s (RA) school in tariqat. Mujaddad Alif Aani (RA) followed Imam Abu Hanifa(RA) in fiqh and followed Khwaja Bahauddin Naqshband (RA) in tariqat. Sultan Bahu followed Imam Abu Hanifa(RA) in fiqh but followed Ghausul Aazam in tariqat.
I don’t think you get this now, but insha’Allah with time you will, if God desires so.
Live in peace my friend!
AA Ibrahim,
For Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal going to Bishr Hafi please read Tazkiratul Awliya by Fariduddin Attar. BTW there are sections on Imam-e Aazam, Imam Shafi and Imam Hanbal in that book too as sufis respect all scholars. I think it will be an eye opener. If you can read Urdu try to get an urdu translation, english translations are not good enough.
Yes, Ghausul Aazam (RA) followed Imam Hanbal (RA) in fiqh and Hazrat Junaid Baghdadi’s (RA) school in tariqat. Mujaddad Alif Aani (RA) followed Imam Abu Hanifa(RA) in fiqh and followed Khwaja Bahauddin Naqshband (RA) in tariqat. Sultan Bahu followed Imam Abu Hanifa(RA) in fiqh but followed Ghausul Aazam in tariqat.
I don’t think you get this now, but insha’Allah with time you will, if God desires so.
Live in peace my friend!
Who says sufis don’t believe in sama?
And who says that Sama means “Music” and Song?
speaking of movies, Indian’s MUNNA BHAI-II did make a difference in society so is RANG DE BASANTI- GO and read papers.
Salamalikum,
Yes, Kruman I don’t want to get into argument also. But, you are on the mark: What you stated at the end is bidat and shirk and this is no fatwa of mine. The people I quoted were some that people might know otherwise I could have quoted many. These deobandi scholars believe in sufism and follow turuq. So, go ask them about singing and chanting!! Same with Nadwi and Maududi although I don’t think they followed any tariqah. Provide reference when Imam ibn Hanbal went to the stated sufi?
Points of gnosis were not even known to Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Shafi and Imam Hanbal.
This is a major crime on Islam and scholars that the knowledge has been divided into “shariat” and “tariqiat”. There is no distinction. There is no bigger scholars, as stated by other scholars themselves, than al-Aiema Abi Hanfia and Malik and Shafi and ibn Hanbal. No “sufi,” whether that be Junaid al-Baghdadi or Maroof al-Karkhi or Abdul Qadir al-Jilani has more knowledge than them, Allahu Alam. In fact, if I had time I would have quoted sayings of Abdul Qadir Jilani, who was Hanbali scholar, al-Mujaddid Sirhindi Alf Thani, a Hanafi scholar, and others that would have debunked the theory of the type of sufism you talk about.
Yes, this is it. I won’t this matter any more. But, we agree on this duaa: May Allah guide us to the correct understanding of Islam.