Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?

Posted on May 19, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, Society
313 Comments
Total Views: 117122

Adil Najam

This is a painful post to write.

Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.

I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”

But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.

I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.

Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.

But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.

I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.

Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.

But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.

I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.

The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.

313 responses to “Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?”

  1. A. Danish says:

    Alhamdulillah, this is excellent writeup. You have spoken like a true and dedicated Muslim. Those who are inciting violence are only doing fitna in the name is Islam. Your approach in this writeup is the right one. Let us learn from our beloved Prophet (saw) and not dishonor Him (saw) with our anger.

    Wassalam.

  2. Truth Seeker says:

    Freedom of speech is guaranteed by the constitution of civilized countries.

    You can disagree with the draw Mohammad idea, but you cannot destroy public property or break any civilized law.

    Simple.

  3. Ruhina says:

    Rasul Allah (sal Allahu alaihi wasallam)
    said: “He who stirs enmity among people, by quoting their words to each
    other, will not enter Paradise.” [Bukhari] – Listen up people.. The world has enough problems, dont stir up new ones. Ignore the provocation. Prove your love through obedience.. not demonstrations. How many of u, who are of…fline today, pray 5 times a day? Stop nitpicking.. concentrate on the facts. Good write up Mr Najam.

  4. Aliya says:

    @Uni. Please don’t lie about the Prophet.

    “handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor.”

    Yes, that is exactly what he did. Always. At Hudaibia, with the women who threw garbage at him, always.

    Unless you consider yourself better than the Prophet (SAW), please don’;t spread lies about him and make him seem like an evil and angry mobster. He is Rehmat for the world and that means he was always tolerant. He would even have been tolerant with the likes of you!

  5. Uni says:

    Salam to all

    The post is no doubt very ”moderately” written so that everybody and anybody would agree with it. But why are we so forgiving to the people who are not so ‘moderate’ regarding our religious beliefs. Most of the commentators agree with ignoring this act. I feel that if we ignore it, it’s only going to get worse.

    In the ideologically disturbed times of today, there is no sitting on the fence. You have GOT to take sides. And if you’re not taking this side, you’re definitely on the other. Again, in the words of George Bush on November 2001, ”éither you’re with us, or you’re against us.”

    So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek.

    That is a very convenient way of letting people walk all over you. After all, why will there be a fight when one party just decides to become the punching bag? There is no logic in that.

    When you talk about the models the Holy Prophet (peace be upon him) followed, there were always specific reasons for doing so (they weren’t strong enough, they had a higher purpose in mind, etc). The question is, did the Prophet allow artists to draw him then? He could have “handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor.”

    But did he?

    No he didn’t.

    If he didn’t… what gives us the right to see something like that happening (and worse, because they’re making cartoons and insulting him), and not protest?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*