Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?

Posted on May 19, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, Society
313 Comments
Total Views: 115026

Adil Najam

This is a painful post to write.

Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.

I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”

But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.

I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.

Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.

But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.

I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.

Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.

But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.

I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.

The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.

313 responses to “Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?”

  1. Allan says:

    The Facebook page was in response to the censoring of an episode of South Park that was to depict the Prophet Mohammad. There was a lot of outrage from the Muslim community and even death threats were sent to the creators of the show. There was no outrage from Christians or Buddhists, however, even though the show had Buddha using cocaine and Jesus looking at internet porn. The mere mention of Mohammad, on the other hand, leads to death threats. My question is how come there is a double standard with Muslims? How come shows like South Park and websites like Facebook can be offensive to certain religions but not to Islam? That question is not rhetorical, I really would love to know.

  2. Bangash says:

    @Jeff Wheeler

    Your stance is unreasonable. If you are free to provoke, others are free to respond. Alas provocateurs like you can now draw their filth, and make some bucks due to the overreaction of Pakistanis and other Muslims.

  3. Elaine says:

    Nice read and thoughtful take on a difficult subject. This gives me hope that we have sane people still with us. But maybe we still have more insane people – those making these hateful pages as well as those getting all twisted because of them.

  4. Jeff Wheeler says:

    I support the Facebook page. I support free speech. Everybody has the right to draw a cartoon of whoever they choose — Mohammad or anyone else. It’s important to stand up for this basic human right. It hurts people’s feelings, or offends them? So what. Do you think people have a right to expect to go through life without getting offended or having their feelings hurt? No they do not. You might say it’s forbidden in your religion to depict Mohammad. Maybe so (although in history, many Muslim artists have depicted the Prophet). In any case — rules of the Muslim religion do not apply to non-Muslims. What makes you think you can make up a rule that binds me? That is not your place. As a cartoonist, I have the right to draw anyone I choose to — and you’ve got NOTHING to say about it. If your feelings are hurt by a cartoon, your job is to grow up and get over it — quit being a pathetic crybaby. Hopefully “Draw Mohammad Day” will become more popular every year, to make the point that your “feelings” are not more important than the right to free speech. You can’t cut off all of our heads.

  5. Ajnabi Khan says:

    I found your write up very interesting, and great analysis.
    Usually, I agree with the more liberal views, however, I beg to differ with your stance in this article. While ignoring the issue would have been one option; and, definitely better than shooting someone, burning tires, or “general tore-phore”. The main point where I agree with you is that Face Book should have shown sensitivity to millions of people who would be offended by “Draw Muhammad Day”; they knew better; it is in bad taste, to say the least. Is there nothing better to do for these people other than spend time insulting others?
    Just like when we become liberal minded and we expect that the religious people should respect our right to think independently; is it not incumbent upon us to offer the same courtesy to those who continue to be live their lives “more religiously”?
    Even though I might have ignored this competition because I am liberal minded; I agree with those who think that they need to protest “loud and clear” that their feelings have been hurt. A boycott of Face Book would, in my humble opinion, be a reasonable way to show that this behavior is unacceptable. “Tore-phore, burning tires, shooting, and killing” does not achieve anything.
    Hopefully, those whose feelings are hurt will send the message in an appropriate manner; peacefully and with dignity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*