Custom Search

What are Benazir Bhutto and Pervez Musharraf up to?

Posted on April 19, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, ATP Poll, People, Politics
78 Comments
Total Views: 29264

Share

Adil Najam

Rumors of a ‘deal’ between PPP leader Benazir Bhutto and Gen. Pervez Musharraf have been rife for a long time. All indications now suggest that a deal of some sort has, in fact, been reached.

The ferocity with which the rumors are being denied – with obvious insincerity – suggests that something is afoot. The question is, exactly what.

There is little utility, it seems to us, to indulge any further in the speculation than people already are. The much more important question is what – if anything – will such a deal mean for Pakistan and for democracy in Pakistan.




Will it make things better? Will it make things worse? Will things remain as they have always been and this will simply be one more round in the ‘great game’ of musical chairs that has always been Pakistan politics?

That is the question for our new ATP Poll (see top of middle column). Let us know what you think, and why? With your vote in the poll and with your comments below.

Obama calls for corporate tax rate cut

SouthtownStar (Chicago, IL) February 23, 2012 WASHINGTON ??? President Barack Obama rolled out a corporate tax overhaul plan Wednesday that lowers rates but also eliminates loopholes and subsidies cherished by the business world. A long shot for action in an election year, the plan nevertheless stamps Obama???s imprint on one of the most high-profile issues of the presidential campaign.

The president???s plan to lower the corporate tax rate to 28 percent came on the same day Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney called for a 20 percent across-the-board cut in personal income tax rates, underscoring the potency of taxes as a political issue, especially during a modest economic recovery.

Obama has not laid out a plan for overhauling personal income taxes. But he has called for Bush-era tax cuts to end on individuals making more than $200,000, thus increasing their taxes, and for a 30 percent minimum tax on taxpayers who make $1 million or more. this web site corporate tax rate

Obama decried the current corporate tax system as outdated, unfair and inefficient. ???It???s not right and it needs to change,??? he said in a statement.

The president would reduce the current 35 percent corporate tax, which is the highest in the world after Japan but which many corporations avoid by taking advantage of deductions, credits and exemptions. Under his plan, manufacturers would receive incentives so that they would pay an even lower effective tax rate of 25 percent.

His plan would eliminate corporate tax benefits like oil and gas industry subsidies and special breaks for the purchase of private jets ??? two provisions that Obama has long targeted ??? and do away with certain corporate tax shelters.

In addition, Obama also would impose a minimum tax on foreign earnings, a move opposed by multinational corporations and perhaps the most contentious provision in the president???s plan.

Romney also has called for a 25 percent corporate tax rate, in line with what some congressional Republicans want. Campaigning in Arizona, the former Massachusetts governor said that if elected president he would propose lowering the top personal income tax rate to 28 percent from the current 35.

In Congress, Republican reaction was mixed. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.), said he appreciated the administration???s plan, though it set a corporate tax rate that is higher than the 25 percent he has proposed. He faulted Obama, however, for not offering a wholesale overhaul of the tax system for businesses and individuals.

???While this is a good step by the administration, I will borrow from the president???s own words to Congress from just yesterday: ???Don???t stop here. Keep going,?????? Camp said in a statement. But Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, dismissed the president???s plan as a ???set of bullet points designed more for the campaign trail than an actual blueprint for fixing our tax code.???

The issue of taxation has been a recurrent theme throughout Obama???s presidency. He has reduced some taxes for small businesses and has pressed Congress to temporarily cut payroll taxes on American workers to help prime the weak economy.

But he also has called for reducing the nation???s long-term deficits with a mix of tax increases and spending cuts. Republicans have flatly rejected tax increases. And Romney on Wednesday criticized Obama???s proposal for corporations, saying they would result in higher taxes.

Under the framework proposed by the administration, the rate cuts, closed loopholes and the minimum tax on overseas earning would result in no increase to the deficit.

That means that many businesses that slip through loopholes or enjoy subsidies and pay an effective tax rate that is substantially less than the 35 percent corporate tax could end up paying more under Obama???s plan. Others, however, would pay less while some would simply benefit from a more simplified system.

Obama???s plan would result in about $250 billion in additional revenue over the next 10 years. But that money would be used to pay business tax credits that are currently temporary and that Obama would make permanent, administration officials said.

Corporate income taxes have been shrinking as a share of overall federal taxes for decades. In 2010, corporate income taxes made up just 12 percent of all federal tax receipts, down from 24 percent in 1960, according to the IRS.

Reducing the corporate tax rate to 28 percent would reduce tax revenues by about $700 billion over the next decade, according to an estimate prepared in October by the Joint Committee on Taxation, the official scorekeeper for Congress.

That means lawmakers would have to find about $70 billion a year in tax increases to keep the package from adding to the budget deficit, hardly an easy task.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who presented Obama???s plan, acknowledged that the debate ???will be politically contentious.???

???Some will say these proposals are too tough on business, and others will say that they???re not tough enough,??? he said. see here corporate tax rate

Indeed, several liberal-leaning groups criticized Obama???s plan for being ???revenue neutral??? and not generating more tax money to pay for government programs. ???We can and should collect more tax revenue from corporations,??? said Bob McIntyre, the director of Citizens for Tax Justice.

But the business groups objected to Obama???s plan to impose a minimum tax on foreign earnings, insisting instead that the administration embrace a ???territorial??? system of taxation.

The United States taxes U.S.-based multinational corporations on foreign profits, once that money is returned to the United States. In a territorial system, the United States would only tax profits made in the United States By taxing the foreign profits of U.S.-based multinationals, the United States has a worldwide system of taxation.

Those foreign profits are not taxed unless they are brought to the United States. And, in many cases, they are simply reinvested overseas, so they are never subjected to U.S. taxes. Administration officials said that under Obama???s plan, multinational corporations would continue to receive a tax credit for any taxes they pay overseas.

???America is the only major country that disadvantages its own firms competing globally,??? U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas Donohue said.

Obama J. Scott Applewhite

Related Posts with Thumbnails

78 comments posted

Comment Pages: [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

  1. Rafay Kashmiri says:
    November 30th, 2007 7:09 am

    @ Mushy, BB deal done ,

    Fazlurtaliban is a leftist kebab mein haddi,

    left is soldout Marxists/seculars/liberals marchandise
    to be auctioned.

  2. brianna says:
    November 16th, 2007 10:26 am

    i really like these pictures. they are a lot cooler than the other websites..

  3. brianna says:
    November 16th, 2007 10:25 am

    wow. this website is verry interesting.. i think you should e mail more to me so i can show it to me other friends back where i live. e mail me anything about this cuz i like it.

  4. ANNIE says:
    October 14th, 2007 10:25 am

    this is the col picture.aisa lagta hai jaise in dono ki shaddi ho gai hai.in dono ne kursi ke liye mar jana hai

  5. ali says:
    July 28th, 2007 9:25 pm

    just as george bush attacking iraq made things worse for america this can only help pakistan. this will show how bad musharraf and benazir bhutto really are. i think this will open the eyes of the public and hopefully the good forces can now come out. i think all the people who care abt in parties such as the ppp, pml n, mqm, jamaat, and pti shud form an alliance. they shud stand up against benazir bhutto, musharraf, nawaz sharif, and altaf hussain. these people are a big part of the failing of our country. they have platforms and bogus visions to take the dignity out of our people and the nation. people shud resent forces not because they are liberal or they are religious, they shud stand up for whats right. maybe its not out there right now but thats how things change. people are usually scared of the word revolution, and they shud be, we have seen bloody revolutions. The CJ of pakistan in my view is now the most powerful person in Pakistan, it will be up to him, was the fight for the independence of the judiciary worth it or not? If he fails this task Pakistan will have gone back 50 years and the credibility he and the judiciary had earned will be short lived.

  6. April 24th, 2007 11:10 am

    Actually, what is required is free and fair elections but that is too much to expect given past experience. No elections were as close to being fair as the 1970 elections but then the PPP who signed the Legal Framework Order and participated in the elections on that basis did not attend the National Assembly session called in March 1971, which eventually led to the break up of Pakistan, as per the movement “yahan hum and wahan tum,â€

Comment Pages: [10] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All



Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!