Adil Najam
To view such a video and assume that all of Pakistan is against the Taliban would be as delusional as the proposition that all of Pakistan is for them is deceptive.
The point of this video is not that all Pakistanis are opposed to Talibanization. It is that not all Pakistanis are for them.
The distinction between the two is subtle, but vital. The video puts to a lie the notion that anti-Taliban sentiment are to be found only in the so-called "liberal" and "elite" classes. Indeed, the empirical fact is that the people who the Taliban and other religious extremist forces have been killing in Pakistan are (a) nearly all Pakistanis, (b) nearly all Muslims, and (c) none of them are either very "liberal" or very "elite."
It should not be a surprise, then, that at least some, probably many, and possibly most, "non-liberal," "non-elite," Pakistani Muslims would be against the Taliban and the war they are waging on Pakistan, Pakistanis and on Pakistani Muslims. The tragedy is that too many Pakistanis remain agnostic on the Talibanization threat and even more who are afraid of or reluctant to raise their voices against them.
There is clearly a need to counter the propaganda of those who would have us believe that the Taliban are opposed only by a few "liberal elites." But equally important – even more important – is the need to acknowledge and somehow deal with the deep fissures and divisions within Pakistani society. Indeed, if there is any one unambiguous truth about Pakistan today it is that we are a deeply divided society. Deeply divided on many of the most existential questions about the country’s past, present and future: Including on questions of what the Taliban represent and how they should be dealt with. It is this division that the Taliban are exploiting. Until these societal fissures are somehow addressed neither military action, nor political strategy, nor international intervention will make any difference whatsoever.
Glenfed, Met Life team up on insurance sales in branches. (Glendale Federal Bank; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.)(Brief Article)
American Banker July 22, 1996 | Kapiloff, Howard Glendale Federal Bank is looking to Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. to help it boost sales in its fledgling life insurance unit.
The $15.6 billion-asset thrift has opened the doors of its Los Angeles County branches to 17 Met Life insurance agents. The two companies hope eventually to increase the sales force to 40 and expand the program throughout California.
“The program we’ve developed with Met Life brings to the table a very powerful new marketing force,” said Stephen J. Trafton, chairman and chief executive of the Glendale, Calif.-based thrift. metlifedentalnow.net met life dental
Metropolitan Life, second in size only to Prudential Life Insurance Companies of America, is the largest insurer to announce plans to sell its policies through the bank channel. Its deal with Glenfed is its first attempt to take advantage of a Supreme Court decision lifting some restrictions on bank insurance sales. see here met life dental
Under its agreement with Glenfed, Met Life agents in the bank’s branches will sell policies underwritten by Met Life only. Met Life will work with Glenfed to coordinate marketing programs and to develop a customer referral program, said John F. Chatfield 3d, a vice president in charge of Met Life’s banking group.
Met Life and Glenfed refused to disclose the financial terms of their deal. Other companies that supply investment representatives to bank branch lobbies – third-party marketers – typically pay rent based on the volume they generate.
“Met Life has been closely monitoring the bank marketplace for some time,” Mr. Chatfield said. It is “currently in dialogue with a number of financial institutions” about setting up a program like the one at Glenfed.
Mr. Chatfield said Met Life is “positioned” to sell mutual funds and other investment products through banks too.
But some consultants remain skeptical.
Insurance agents, who typically sell one policy a week, would have to double their production in order to make an insurer’s partnership with a bank profitable, said Kenneth Kehrer, an insurance consultant in Princeton, N.J.
Mr. Kehrer noted the failure of earlier attempts by Metropolitan to sell through banks, including a program at Mercantile Bancorp., St. Louis, in the early 1980s.
Driving the New York-based insurer’s interest in the bank channel is the fact that sales of life insurance through its 10,600 career agents are declining. Sales dropped 7.6% from 1994 to 1995, according to Michael Albanese, an analyst at A.M. Best Co., Oldwick, N.J. Industry sales during the same period plummeted 11%, he said.
Kapiloff, Howard
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Digg
YouTube
adnan, the religious and the liberal/secular can keep on arguing and blaming each other till the cows come home, but it is not going to make an iota of contribution towards a constructive resolution of the problems facing us all as Pakistanis. if anything, common sense demands that we find some minimum common ground so we can cooperate with, rather than undercut, each other all the time.
while taliban alone may not deserve the blame for all ills, it is also true that there is nothing positive that can be said of their movement. in time, it will certainly destroy Pakistan. i think that being religious, or being liberal/secular, does not alter this reality in the least.
what we need is to find a constructive accomodation that we can all live with in good conscience; and i say this as an orthodox believer. the resolution we need to find must give sufficient space to all – liberal, religious, minorities – for them to be able to support it.
if we can truly understand what shari’ah really is, there is nothing in it that will stop us from finding such a solution. think about it.
PMA: let’s agree to disagree to argue about conservative vs religious as it would be quite childish and futile to debate about unnecessary thing. I try to answer you statement by statement.
My difficulty with religious community is that it often takes upon itself to police those who do not conform to their ideology or version of
Dear Mr. Siddiqi: Our ideological disagreements are not signs of disrespect for each other. You are saying that Pakistani society is ” either religious or semi-religious” and “conservative is a Western term”. Well if ‘conservative’ is a Western term then so are the terms like ‘liberal’, ‘religious’ and ‘secular’. I would say being religious is being conservative, without relegating any negativity to it. I believe that in a free and open society each and every member of the society has full right to carry what ever belief they wish as long as their believes do not infringe upon the rights and believes of others. This principle applies to all schools of thoughts. My difficulty with religious community is that it often takes upon itself to police those who do not conform to their ideology or version of ‘true religion’. I present his discussion on the use of word ‘ya’ (oh) by Brother Ibrahim on this post as an exhibit in support of my point. Taliban as a movement must be heard and allowed political space but not as an armed gang and enforcers about to destroy our country and society. They have no right to force their ideology on innocent people at gun point. And please do not say that this commenter has taken his position under Western media influence. Please grant me the same intellectual respect that I grant you. I speak as a person who loves Pakistan and her people no matter what their personal believes are. West is against Taleban because Taleban abate and support Al-Qaeda, a sworn enemy of the West. Pakistanis detest Taleban because they are about to destroy Pakistan. Pakistan has enough external security threats and need not to be burdened by the internal threats like Taleban.
@ Ibrahim…
a couple of things here…
1. You have branded an entire group of People…the Barelvi’s as people involved in Shirk…nothing new on your part there….the real scandal here is that you are actively trying to ‘Outsource’ Allah (SWT)’s work unto yourself…ie, knowing what is the state of people’s faith and their Godliness…who is truly a Momin and Who is not..
…the arrogance is astounding….are you doing this because you think that the Almighty hasnt actually done a good job of it so far and you need to take over?
2. According to you:
‘Shariah offered by Taliban (which is not too off from the actual Shariah’ (with a few minor problems you added)…
responding to such mental farts is now completely beyond me…
all I can say is that may you and your kin live under this ‘so called sharia’ ….. I dont see anything but punishment for this…punishment for that….punishment for this and that….nothing beyond that…………………………………
oh and neither do I see anything ‘Sharia-like’ in digging up corpses and hanging them on public squares…..and maybe im slow…but I cannot see anything ‘sharia-like’ in killing a school teacher for the length of his shalwar….and I dont see anything ‘Sharia-like’ in beheading …what are effectively..Prisoners of war…and hanging their bodies upside down and placing their heads where there genitals should be…
I also dont see anything in sharia that forces me to deprive my child of Polio drops so that if he dies of Polio he dies as shaheed (a fun little description from 2007 from the Swat Taliban for why Polio vaccine isnt allowed by them)….
by all means…if you think Polio is good for your child…please go ahead…….INFACT….how come you and your family did not move to afghanistan and Swat later on if this is indeed your idea of a Utopian society?
so just to re-iterate…
I cannot answer everytime you have a mental fart and decide to let the rest of us bask in it’s stench and then ask how we liked it…..
yes…your post was long winded……and I want the 4 minutes of my life that I spent reading it….back …!!!!so I can do something more useful like watching grass grow…
I dont need to ask PMA or anyone’s uncle…or get their endorsement for what is my opinion about your post…..
PS: any issues with my prayers and beard? If so, please feel free to Sod off…
Where are all those cyber soldiers who were hyper enough in favor of Operation are hibernating and not leaving Pakistan and coming back to home to help more than a million people who left volatile areas? Where are all those extreme liberals who always make claims that they belong to Swat,malaKhand areas. Why are they not leaving their current countries and coming back to help their brothers and sisters? Who will help them? Why pro-operation supporters are not making any effort at all to feed those who did not leave their areas in the presence of “Evil” Talibans and they were forced to leave their places only after operation. Is it not ironic? so who is sounding more evil here? The Talibans or Pakistan Army? UN declared “World Biggest Flee” when 15Lakh+ people left their places. Why these people did nto leave their homes in the time of Talibans?
I think We are repeating same mistake which we did at the time of Lal Masjid, At that time it was media who was provoking for operation and when the operation was finished, same media was crying over killing of thousands of innocent students who were killed by fascist dictator Musharraf. The current Flee could blow up Zardari govt any time soon because things are very worst. Those displaced people are not being fed at all. Our so called liberals don;t have time to come out of pubs and take care of those who they call their “relatives”. Several hundred innocent people have been killed in the recent operation. Now you guys should not whine if their relatives are brain washed by our enemies like India,Afghanistan and Russia and use them against us because revenge can make a person to do anything. Lal masjid massacre gifted us suicide bombers. Now these “Panah Guzeen” who are getting settled in Karachi and Interior Sind and Punjab could be more lethal because one can’t figure out who is innocent among them and who is the real culprit. I do not understand how do they claim they killed xxx militants while even USA who have high fi technology could not create difference and killed several hundred innocents in drone attacks?
No wonder , the agenda of liberals that is promoting anti-Islamic things is in more danger after this operation because more people will be going to get back to Islam and study what actually it is and many others will get ready to take revenge of their relatives who are being killed by fascist army guys. In short, Islam is not getting suppressed anyway. I remember how many like me who hardly used to pray 2 times in a day and often skipped Jumma prayers were forced to study Quran with translation after so called 9/11 attacks and Iraq war. The problem for liberals and USA is not Talibans but Islam. If today some other xyz group stands up to implement Islam then all fundo liberals and their NGOs and USA would be after them. They are scared of Islam and I enjoy such fear among them. No matter how many people are killed, the fact will not change, we will have more “reverted Muslims” who would be made curious enough to study more Islam and why West oppose it.
I again second what PMA said that there are not even 1% people who favor liberals’ secular agenda or extreme view of Islam. The majority of Pakistan wants Islam in their lives. That’s unfortunate that extreme groups of left and right could not make it happen but one day it will happen and it’s in Islamic texts.
The fact remains that majority of Muslims in Pakistan belong to Bralevi sect of Islam.
According to Mr Ibrahim they are Mushriks or basically Kafir.
The duty of true Muslims should be to convert all Mushriks to true Islam first and then talk about implementation of true Sharia.If they are not competent enough to do so at least establish true Sharia in a country where they are in majority for example Saudi Arabia or Egypt.Thus setting an example for lesser Muslims to follow.
Until then please don’t encourage killing of innocent people in the name of True Religion.