By Yasser Latif Hamdani
Last week (February 6) marked the 114th Birthday of one of Pakistan’s greatest unsung heroes. Once again, there was no mention of commemoration of his remarkable like. No sense of gratitude from a nation for which he did so much. He has been wiped out of our memory because he was an Ahmadi, despite his glorious contributions to Pakistan and its cause (see related post on Dr. Abdul Salam).
Sir Zafrullah Khan’s services rendered to Muslims of India, Pakistan and the Third World are second only to that of Quaid-e-Azam Mahomed Ali Jinnah. As a jurist, a diplomat and a patriot he stood head and shoulders above the lesser men who have made a mockery of our republic.
Born in 1893 in Sialkot in what was to become one of the earliest Ahmaddiya households, this small town boy rose to be one of the shrewdest legal minds of his time. His early education was in Sialkot, after which he proceeded to Lahore for his bachelors degree, under the tutelage of none other than the great Iqbal himself. He got his law degree from King’s College London in 1914, where he stood top of his class and was the first person from the Indian subcontinent to do so. He was, like most great figures of that time, called to bar at Lincoln’s Inn.
As a practicing lawyer, he soon proved his mettle and had many reported cases to his name. The first major politician to recognize Zafrullah’s talents was Sir Fazli Hussain, the founder of Unionist Party of Punjab. Starting his career in his early 30s as a member of the Punjab legislative Council, he rose to prominence as an indefatigable crusader for Muslims of Punjab. Later he represented the Muslims at round table conference and crossed swords with figures like Jinnah and Gandhi. In 1931, he became the Muslim League president and at the roundtable conference, he cornered no less a person than Churchill in a committee hearing who was forced to accept Zafrullah’s point of view.
Later he was offered a seat on Viceroy’s permanent Council, which he took to further his cause. He also served at varying times as the minister of Railways, Public works, labour and law under the Viceroy. For a brief period, he also became British India’s representative to the League of Nations, just before it was dissolved.
However his greatest contribution came when he drafted the famous Lahore Resolution, which till this day is the rallying point of Pakistan and Pakistani nationalism. He had been tasked with finding a common point between the popular demand for “Pakistan” and Muslim League’s all India requirements. The Lahore resolution was a broad based solution which left the door virtually open for several solutions and negotiation on the issue of partition. In essence it envisaged 2 or 3 great republics for the Muslim peoples and it was this document which forms the basis not just of Pakistan but also of Bangladesh. For this he got a lot of slack. No less a person than Khan Abdul Wali Khan highlighted Zafrullah’s religious belief to play on the popular conspiracy theory that holds Ahmadis to be British touts.
Later from 1942 onwards, he served as a federal judge (equivalent of an Supreme court C judge) of India and finally took leave on the eve of Pakistan to serve the cause of Pakistan before the Radcliffe Commission, on Jinnah’s personal request. On 25th December 1947, Jinnah appointed him the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. At the UN, Sir Zafrullah emerged as the most eloquent advocate of all third world and Islamic issues. It was Zafrullah whose efforts materialized into the UN Resolutions on Kashmir, which are the basis of the Pakistani case and grievance. Later he became the first Asian president of the International Court of Justice, a singular and unique honor for any Pakistani. He also served, briefly, as the President of the UN General Assembly. He passed away in September of 1983 in Lahore.
A prolific author on the history of Pakistan and Islam, his most famous book was titled “Agony of Pakistan” in which he makes plain the great betrayal which wrested the country from the hands of its patriots into the hands of those who were its greatest enemies. Ironically, today Jinnah’s most trusted lieutenant is not even remembered by the state which owes him so much, including its own founding document. It is the memory of people like Zafrullah Khan that will keep alive the original idea of Pakistan and there is no doubt that one day the posterity will reclaim its true destiny as a progressive and modern republic.
Yasser Latif Hamdani is a lawyer in Lahore and a researcher of the history of the Pakistan Movement.
Oh, how much I wish I was from Karachi too so my irrelevant to the post comments could stay here too…oh one can only wish…
As for Javed Iqbal,,,,,,,,haha! youwant me read him who doesnt pay due reverence to his own father?
Butt sb,you mean the mohwara “Wali k ghar shaitan” was said for Jawed Iqbal? ;)
[quote] … They eat and drink in the same plates we muslims do. People like Ardsher Cowasjee are lucky enough to be living in Pakistan to bluntly comment on its and its people’s shortcomings . [/quote]
This is the most racist and bigoted comment I have come across on this blog. I do not hold a brief for Cowasji’s but it is widely known that his family was lucky enough to own most of Karachi even before Pakistan. As a citizen, he has as much right to comment on or criticize Pakistan as any Bugti, Bhutto, Bhurgari, Bhinder, Bangash — or Butt.
Adnan Ahmad
I seriously disagree with you. You are merely trying to play pun with words. As a muslim I fail to understand the difference you allude to between Islam and Muslim. Are not the followers of Islam, in word and spirit, Muslims?
I think minorities in Pakistan are doing better than most muslims here. The new generations of these minorities (with exceptions of some well to do minorities) have forsaken their forefathers profession and are enjoying good social status in Pakistan. They eat and drink in the same plates we muslims do. People like Ardsher Cowasjee are lucky enough to be living in Pakistan to bluntly comment on its and its people’s shortcomings . This all goes to prove that your outlook in this regard is completely wrong.
As for Shiites, there is no discrimination. I have more shia friends than others and I havnt seen them complaining of the sort you mention.
Yes, but there are certain restrictions laid down by the Constitution as to filling of higher posts. That’s the law of the country and if you talk against it you would be talking against Pakistan. Try to change the law if you can but don’t blame the formulators of the said laws or constitutional bindings. This is neither in your hands nor mine. Then why do you forget that Pakistan is an ”ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN” ,,,,,,there is thus no justification for minorities to shape the future of the majority.
As for Sir Zafarullah Khan,,,,,he’s a past and dead case. I dont want to read anymore about him.I already stated what I flet about him in previous posts.
As for Javed Iqbal,,,,,,,,haha! youwant me read him who doesnt pay due reverence to his own father?
A petition was just turned down by Pakistan Supreme Court to remove Justice Bhagwandas, submitted on the same premise that you wrote in your first sentence. Pakistan was created for muslims and not for Islam. This does not mean Pakistani Hindus, Christians and other minorities would be treated any less just because they do not follow mainstream religion. I have close shia friends who occasionally with a broken heart discuss the injustices happened to their elders because of their religious background when it came to top level job postings in the Pakistani government. For how long can this continue? Is it good for Pakistan? I have tried to stay away from this silly thread all along but all I say is please read Justice Javed Iqbal’s autobiography and the part where he talks about Sir Zafrullah Khan. Can Pakistan afford to lose more sons like Zafrullah Khan? If we are to get out of these dark ages we must start where Jinnah left and move above these prejudiced hostilities and injustices, and act like humans.