Ayesha Siddiqa’s “Military Inc.” Causes Waves in Pakistan

Posted on June 1, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Books, Politics
120 Comments
Total Views: 76847

Adil Najam

As was expected – but much more so than expected becasue of its timing – Ayesha Siddiqa’s new book Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy is causing waves in Pakistan and abroad.

True to form, the establishment has bothed up things even more than usual by trying to mess with the book’s launch in Islamabad. That only made the launch an even bigger news than it would have been. Here, for example, is the top of the page, front page news item from Dawn (June 1, 2007):

A book putting a critical spotlight on the military’s business nooks was launched from a virtual sanctuary on Thursday and some high-profile political reviewers seized upon it to denounce the army’s role in Pakistani politics.

The launching of the book, Military Inc: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy, by Dr Ayesha Siddiqa, a military analyst, was due to have taken place at the capital’s elitist Islamabad Club. But the author told a surprised audience that not only the club cancelled the booking of its auditorium, “all hotels in Islamabad were also told� by unspecified authorities not to allow the use of their halls for this, forcing the organisers to find a sanctuary at a third floor room provided by a non-governmental organisation.

PPP’s legal star Aitzaz Ahsan said the time had come to stand up against the military dominance while PML-N Information Secretary Ahsan Iqbal accused Pakistan army generals of not learning a lesson from other countries that said goodbye to military rule. But some other speakers had a dig also at politicians for doing little to keep the military in check while being in power and at times celebrating the ouster of their rivals. Mr Aitzaz Ahsan said the expose of Ayesha, who puts the net worth of the army’s commercial empire at Rs200 billion, had come at a “defining moment� in Pakistan’s history following President Pervez Musharraf’s controversial charge-sheeting and suspension of Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry.

He narrated what he called the military’s moves in the past to convert Pakistan into a national security state contrary to the Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah’s vision of a welfare state and to forge an alliance with mullahs in search of an ideological justification for this, but said he thought now “a watershed has comeâ€Â?. Mr Ashan, who heads Justice Iftikhar’s legal team, saw “a turning pointâ€Â? in the March 9 presidential action against the chief justice that plunged the country into a judicial crisis and said: “We must grasp it.â€Â? Cheers went up in the congested premises of the NGO Leadership for Environment and Development as Mr Ahsan referred to what he called an unexpected “noââà ¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ã‚? by the chief justice to the president’s demand for his resignation and, in a reference to the nationwide protest movement by lawyers, opposition political activists and the civil society, said: “The spillway of the Tarbela Dam has opened now.â€Â? He said although the chief justice would not speak about the presidential reference pending before the five-judge Supreme Judicial Council or his challenge to the reference before a 13judge bench of the Supreme Court, it was out of compulsion that an affidavit was filed on his behalf on Tuesday about what happened to him during his March 9 meeting with the president and for some days afterwards. “We were compelled to file that affidavit,â€Â? Mr Ahsan said, citing comments made by President Musharraf about the case as the reason.

Mr Iqbal rejected as a myth usual accusations holding politicians responsible for four military coups in Pakistan’s history and put the blame on what he called ambitions of army chiefs who toppled civilian governments from General Mohammad Ayub Khan, who later became field marshal, to General Musharraf. Comparing the ills of military interventions in politics to what cancer does to human body, he said Ayub Khan struck in October 1958 to pre-empt scheduled elections next year, while General Yahya Khan snatched power from him in 1969 at “virtual gunpoint� to prevent a handover to a National Assembly Speaker from then East Pakistan in the midst of a national democratic movement.

General Mohammad Zia-ulHaq, he recalled, seized power on June 5, 1977 a day after then prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and the opposition Pakistan National Alliance had agreed to hold fresh elections. He said Pakistan faced no bankruptcy despite international sanctions for its 1998 nuclear tests and “everything was normal� when General Musharraf, after being sacked, toppled then prime minister Nawaz Sharif on Oct 12, 1999. Mr Zafar Abbas, resident editor of Dawn, Islamabad, and Dr Farrukh Saleem, also complimented the 292-page book published by the Oxford University Press.

It speaks about the role of the military power in transforming the Pakistani society, armed forces becoming an independent class entrenched in the corporate sector and their five giant welfare foundations, or conglomerates, running thousands of businesses ranging from petrol pumps to industrial plants.

I have not yet read the book myself, however, I have talked about it with Ayesha many times – most recently in Boston some weeks ago – and am generally familiar with the thesis of the book. But, then, so is most of Pakistan. It is that the Military’s economic footprint has become too large for teh military’s own good. From cereal to banks to airlines, what she calls ‘Military Inc.’ is now everywhere in Pakistan’s economic life. Her argument is that this is nietehr good for Pakistan nor the military.

I am looking forward to reading and reviewing the book, which Ayesha has promised to send me soon. Meanwhile, we will keep an eye out for substantive reviews of this undoubtedly important work.

120 responses to “Ayesha Siddiqa’s “Military Inc.” Causes Waves in Pakistan”

  1. Oshake says:

    Well done to Dr Siddiqa for showing the courage to write this book. Pakistan Army has long considered itself above scrutiny, above the law. This attitude pervades all through the armed forces, not limited only to those at the top of the military pyramid. Paksitanis have accepted this without question and 30+ years of army rule is the consequence of this attitude. About time we change that.

  2. KO says:

    [quote post=”721″]This news in Daily Times shows that rumor about book being banned is wrong and the author is spreading some of these rumors herself to become controversial. That is not nice.[/quote]

    It wasn’t available in Karachi bookstores yesterday. A Liberybook book branch said management recalled the books before they even started selling them.

    But today it’s being sold again, according to the papers. So there was some ham handed attempt at a ban, than someone must have realized that would be a really stupid move.

  3. younas says:

    Be careful adil Najam, when you are next time in pakistan, have you got a american passport or still travel on pakistani. SAD BUT TRUE , MY inbox is full of threatening emails from jamia hafza, to islami jamiat talba, to military Inc Wallahs
    so the couplet comes to mind
    Na tera Pakistan ,na mera pakistani
    yeh UUS ka pakistan hai ,Jo Sadar-e-Pakistan
    Long Live Islamist Dictatorship of Military Inc(Monsters Inc)

  4. Haroon says:

    I am myself dyingto read the book and just put order on Amazon. But I do wonder if the author is working a little to hard to make thsi controversial.

    This news in Daily Times shows that rumor about book being banned is wrong and the author is spreading some of these rumors herself to become controversial. That is not nice.

    ———-

    Dr Ayesha Siddiqa’s book ‘Military Inc.’ has attracted a great deal of interest as testified by the fact that the first edition was sold out on the day it was released (Thursday). Dr Ayesha confirmed on Friday that all 1,000 copies sold out on the day of the launch. She also said she experienced tremendous pressure in the days leading up to the book launch. “Information Minister Muhammad Ali Durrani phoned me twice to persuade me to cancel the book launch. He also wanted to see me in person but then he did not turn up.â€

  5. king_faisal says:

    edward said gave an interview in which he discusses how myths are repeated by western media until those myths get accepted as facts. That interview is of great relevance here:

    http://student.cs.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/artic les/article0002772.html

    …Why do you think certain Arab authors, professors, and specialists residing in the U.S. are embraced and promoted by the major media and leading opinion journals, while others are ignored or downplayed?

    ES: I think there’s a cultural war in this country between spokespersons for the West, the U.S. and Israel, on the one hand, and those who are perceived as pro-Arab, pro-Islam, pro-Palestinian, and therefore critical of U.S. policy, on the other hand.

    This is a real cultural war. It has little to do with truth; it has little to do with seriousness of scholarship. It has to do with ideological interests. The first group is much more prevalent and receives more attention in the media, than the second group. If you are perceived as belonging to the second group, then you’re trashed and attacked in the most scandalous way.

    …This is because there is a cultural war against Islam: Muslims are considered to be the enemies of the West. On the one hand, there’s a long history of that, and, on the other, there is a sense that Muslims are basically one homogeneous people, not subject to time and place, that there is some kind of mindset that keeps them imprisoned. This sort of racism has really not been combated on a very large scale. The important thing is that it’s aided and abetted by senior academic experts, like Bernard Lewis, Ernest Gellner, and others, who get their stuff published all the time without any serious effort being made to refute them except by a few individuals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*