Job Security in Corporate Pakistan

Posted on June 18, 2007
Filed Under >S.A.J. Shirazi, Economy & Development, People, Society
Total Views: 27588

S.A.J Shirazi

Industrialists (and owners) that define the corporate culture in Pakistan have many things in common. Exceptions apart, corporate leaders in private sector ruthlessly eliminate any one who is not totally behind them.

This trend breeds job insecurity in the blue as well as white collars incumbents at all levels. Result: lack of commitment, lack of involvement by the employees and not putting in their best that in turn results in non-standard work environment and poor productivity. In a private survey restricted to some specially chosen industry units in Lahore, Manga, Bahi Pheru, Raiwind, Chunnian, and Sheikhupura reveals involuntary job loss, for any reason, as a most common concern of the employees. Survey also shows an increase in unemployment duration and decrease in job tenure. Job security is defined as:

“a collective agreement clause which prevents or ameliorates the detrimental effects of job loss due to such factors as technological change, economic downturn, and or contracting.”

But this is not about job loss due to any stated reasons. What is being discussed here is losing a job on the whim of the owner employers. That is one of the major concerns of the employees in industrial sector in Pakistan.

Psychological research on the industrial management suggests that trust is vital to maintaining a sense of job security. But trust is what is lacking here. Employees do not trust their employers and vice versa.

“I am working fine, I like my job and the work environment, I have good opportunities for professional growth, Mian sahib (as the owner chief executives in spinning sector are usually called) likes my job, but I am not sure how long I will be working here,”

says a technical manager in a large spinning unit who has already served in four units since he graduated for Agricultural University in Faisalabad and does not want his name here; obviously.

Majority of those who were asked were already looking for new places to work just in case when they are shown the gate, or when ‘gates are closed on them’ as it is called. The technical manager narrated an incident when Mian Sahib fired another manager:

“How much time will it take you to reach the factory gate? Five minutes. That is all you have to leave the premises. Your pay cheque will follow. Out!”

That is exactly how a manager who had served the unit for five years were fired. “No exaggeration here,” narrated the technical manager.A circulation manager in one large publication house was fired one fine morning.

“Leave the office immediately,” came the orders after he had served 30 years in an organization.

“I picked up my cigarette pack and moved out quietly,” told the fired employee.

Not surprisingly, most senior managers surveyed are found deeply concerned about this uncertain situation and its effects are visible not only on production but also on morale, motivation and physical health. Most organizations do not have comprehensive job security agreements. Even where agreements are in place, many managers who were contacted for their opinion were not convinced that their employers would actually stick to them.

The survey confirmed a significant correlation between job insecurity and poor performance. People do not adjust to job insecurity. Productivity of the employees continues to deteriorate the longer employees remain in a state of insecurity. Moreover, the more insecure people felt at work, the more likely they were to experience tension at home. Conventional economic theory often assumes that security breed complacency.

By contrast, the survey found quite clearly that the relationship between job insecurity and self-reported motivation levels is a negative rather than a positive one.

The industrialists are alive to the situation. But surprisingly, instead of taking measures to revert the situation they use their authority to hire and fire as strength. One owner of a large unit says:

“I have to control a large work force of eleven hundred people in my concern. I do not want to go into lengthy and difficult legalities in court kachery. It is much easier for me to fire any one who is not up to my requirements.”

In the short term firing any unwanted employee, for any reasons, may avoid an unhealthy situation and put all the others on guard and may increase efficiency as well. But, in the long term, the trend currently driving Pakistan private industry has worrying implications not just for individual employees, but also for nation’s industrial growth and the health of its social and work environments.

Whilst there is much that individual employers can do to uphold their duty, there is also a pressing need for polices aimed at regulating the corporate sector. In fact, reservation in the corporate sector could have been legislated in Pakistan from 1947 itself.

And after all, a state claiming to be a welfare state, concerned for the poor, regulating at the time every aspect of the way companies carried on their business, including adoption of new technologies and hiring and firing, could well have pushed for hiring and firing policies that included jobs of all kinds and levels.

More than the policies, the corporate warriors should take advantages of modern management and human resource development principle and should try to win credible commitment of their employees. The researchers and analysts say that, over the long term, such commitments can only be established by fair and open regulatory policies, which would allow for creative work force.

P.S. Photos for this article are taken from

22 responses to “Job Security in Corporate Pakistan”

  1. Adnan Siddiqi says:

    One thing which lack in Pakistani companies is Stocl option. This was the stock options which made early Googlers millionaires over night.

  2. Pakiavelli says:

    Loyalty to job is a two way street. If the work conditions are good, employer takes care of the employee then one can expect good work from a satisfied employee and is to the advantage of both and certainly a win win situation.

    But folks if u feel u r being taken for a ride by the boss and with the connivance of a HR Manager then you have every right to strike back and demand better work environment, respect etc from employer. This needs to be done in a very professional way and over a period of time – who knows your persistance may pay off and actuall remove the workplace irritants and may help the boss in understanding his shortfalls and gaps.

    In case they still dont listen I’d advise u walk out instead of being escorted out when least expecting it. Just remember one thing to professionally charge sheet your employer in the most civilized language and document your gennuine grievances in the resignation letter. It never hurts to consult a HR expert or a responsible corporate legal person before drafting this letter.

    Make sure to have copies of all supporting evidence in case you have an unethical employer so that he will always be fearful of bothering you and will clear all your genuine dues quickly.

    The above advise should not be taken as a norm but as a last resort.



  3. faraz says:

    “In India it is reverse in I.T. Employers feel insecurity from their employees as they leave anytime for better job.”

    Well it is everywhere but in India it is worst. I supervised a outsource team working from India from Boston and their average turnout time(leaving comp) was 6 months.

    There is no such thing as 2 week notice in USA. It is considered as formality not law(decency). A company can fire you with 1 hour notice and you can do same. I happens a lot.

  4. Ather says:

    @Shiraz. Off course my friend it is all about ethics; because ethics is all about voluntary choice.

    Let me extend my opinion “ETHICSâ€

  5. Well, job secuirty as stated in the article is asking for some regulations and laws to be placed that would allo the employee and employeer both some room. In West, its common understanding that a 2 week notice with propr reasons would be given by either party if the job is to be terminated. Thi is something the government and Labor Laws would be requesred to do…..

    However, any concept of life-long job secuirty is not possible in today modern capital market and capitalist system. With outsourcing, faster technological changes and variable socio-political climate, its just not possible to have this.

    Many companys, including my company offers “life-long employability” instead of life-long employment. Means that the company should make new skills and trainning available for employees and then its upto the employee to keep themselves uptodate with the skills in demand. Also, the government could aid a society by offering training and education in new skills or subsidizing them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *