Movie Review: Shoaib Mansoor’s ‘Khuda ke liye’

Posted on July 31, 2007
Filed Under >Yasser Latif Hamdani, TV, Movies & Theatre
420 Comments
Total Views: 252470

Yasser Latif Hamdani

(UPDATE: You can view this movie here).

We had a preview of the movie Khuda Ke Liye at ATP where we had posed a question whether Shoaib Mansoor will be able to revive Pakistan cinema? A probable answer comes from myself who recently got chance to see this movie. The record breaking Pakistani film Khuda Ke Liye has become my favorite film overnight- Hollywood inclusive. Or more accurately I should say, that there hasn’t been a film in the past that has moved and affected me in this way.

Given the standing ovation the film is getting in theatres all over Pakistan from rich and poor alike, one can safely say that I am not the only one. For one thing it is a uniquely Pakistani story, which could have only come out of Pakistan. To sum it up, it is about us – the people of Pakistan warts and all- take it or leave it.

The genius of Shoaib Mansoor was never in doubt for those who have seen his videos or for that matter the famous Alpha Bravo Charlie – the TV Drama on Pakistan Army. What I was unprepared for was the depth in his thought and the way he has managed to capture the Pakistani dilemma on screen. Ours is a complex and rich predicament which needs to be captured in all its nuances and appreciated in all its paradoxical colors. KKL did just that.

I went to the theatre expecting to see the same old liberal v. fundo arguments. There were those, but unlike how these arguments play out in “The Friday Times” and the “Nawai Waqt“, this remarkable film is fully conscious of its Pakistani identity and the strong Islamic component that forms part thereof.

At the risk of spoiling it for those who haven’t seen it, this is the story of two brothers, Mansoor (played by Shaan) and Sarmad (played by theatre actor/musician Fawad of EP fame) both musicians, brought in a well to do Pakistani family. Mansoor and Sarmad are torn apart by the latter’s increased involvement with a certain Maulana Taheri (based most probably on Maulana Sami ul Haq of JUI-S component of the MMA), who turns the soft spoken Sarmad into full fledge Jehadi.

Things are complicated when the brothers’ cousin Mary arrives from London to spend a few days with them, only to discover that she has been tricked by her father into coming to Pakistan to avoid her marrying her Non-Muslim boyfriend Dave. Meanwhile Mansoor leaves for Chicago to enrol at the “School of Music” there. In an epic that switches from London to Lahore to Waziristan to Nangahar Afghanistan to Chicago, these ordinary Pakistanis are increasingly faced with both internal and external conflict. And then there is September 11.

Shoaib Mansoor does not miss a beat, he does not leave any stones unturned. While all characters have more or less the same significance in this plot, it is Mansoor who is at the centre of it: Mansoor who is a proud Pakistani and secure in his Muslim identity, Mansoor who warns Sarmad against extremism, Mansoor who puts the best Muslim and Pakistani foot forward, Mansoor who is abducted by FBI in the middle of the night and beaten and tortured to a pulp, humiliated and abused for being a Pakistani and a Muslim. He is the contrast to Sher Shah and Maulana Taheri. But there are contrasts on the other side as well… Jenny who loves Mansoor for being Mansoor, his classmates who spontaneously join in when Mansoor performs his “music from Pakistan”, his African American professor… all stand in contrast to the American torturers of Mansoor.

The dialogue reaches a fever pitch in a court room in Lahore, where Mary is engaged in a prolonged legal battle. Enter the Bollywood star Naseeruddin Shah. He plays the character of a long bearded progressive Islamic scholar (probably based on Maulana Ahmed Javed and Allama Javed Ahmed Ghamidi of Lahore). In what would be the localised version of “Inherit the wind” Courtroom drama, he engages Maulana Taheri and his coterie in an argument on Islamic law and Islamic dress code.

“There is beard in religion, but no religion in beard,”

declares Shah, adding that

“Two men who did the greatest service to Islam in Pakistan, Mahomed Ali Jinnah and Allama Iqbal, did so without a beard and out of the so called Islamic dresscode, in western dress.”

It was on this line that the entire hall filled with applause. Islam – the universal faith – has no uniform. This lays the stage for the final scene- the most poignant scene of the movie, filmed in Lahore’s beautiful Wazir Khan Mosque– the scene which once again made a Muslim out of me. I’ll let you watch it yourself to understand what I am talking about.
As for the film itself, there seem to be a few technical glitches earlier on but they are easily forgotten. Iman Ali‘s performance as Mary or Maryam in the beginning is annoying and one finds her concocted British accent a little annoying at first. However it grows on you and one discovers the fullness of her effort- which is by far the best I have come across by a Pakistani actress. As for the music, those of you who have only heard Bandaya, you are in for a surprise. The film is as a whole an incredible musical experience. What is more is that you discover how aptly Shoaib Mansoor has placed his music in the various scenes. Indeed, driving back from Lahore on the motorway, I could recount/recollect every scene just by listening to the soundtrack.

This is a movie no Pakistani can afford to miss.

420 responses to “Movie Review: Shoaib Mansoor’s ‘Khuda ke liye’”

  1. Qiqbal says:

    “Top of the heads were cut in almost all closeup scenes. The editing during dialogues could have been snappier, for example, angry conversations do not wait for one person to completely finish the sentence and then wait to answer. These conversations are snappy.”

    This is okay. In fact, the top of the heads cutting off in a close up is a standard Hollywood practice, and believe me it is done for a better viewing experience. Similarly, the dialogue editing as you described is also a norm in Hollywood style practice for a smoother and slick viewing experience.

  2. Eidee Man says:

    As I mentioned before, I really liked the movie. Now, about this quote:

  3. Bashir Dilawar says:

    Propaganda or not, it’s an undeniable fact that the movie has drawn a lot of attention, both in domestic and international mainstream media as well as blogosphere.

    Probably this movie has generated demand for more theaters. As the previous post on this matter pointed out, I hope this movie revives Pakistani cinema.

    Is this movie released worldwide?

  4. Sridhar says:

    A contrary perspective on the movie – from a friend at another forum.

    “While visiting Karachi, I saw this movie in local cinema. The movie did not impress me at all. Naseer uddin shah’s character and role came as probably the only highmark in this movie.

    There is nothing in this movie which seems original and creative. But coming from Jang publications which was instrumental in Propganada for Afghan Jihad in 80s, their new contract with Army regarding anti-jihad Liberal propaganda, is equally disappointing for educated ppl. Maybe it is good for the same target audience that was lured to Afghan jihad.”

  5. Ibrahim says:

    Salamalikum,

    Don’t know why this has been introduced but I’ll reply. Tina, you are looking at the end results instead of the action (or actually inaction). The hukum is to not shave/trim facial hair so as to let it grow to at least fist-length or longer. Now, if someone doesn’t shave/trim and his genetic makeup means he doesn’t grow much facial hair, so be it. He will have the same reward, inshaAllah. It is the intention, the methodology that counts. You don’t have to look at Mayans—even among Arabs and South Asians you will find such cases and of course most Indonesians/Malays don’t have the genes either for much facial hair; sames goes for Africans. I hope this clarifies your confusion. Allahu Alam

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*