The Capital Shock

Posted on August 23, 2008
Filed Under >Raza Rumi, Travel
28 Comments
Total Views: 26887

Raza Rumi
A week long sojourn in Islamabad just came to an end. It was not the Islamabad that I had lived in or the one that my memory was intimate with. It has changed and perhaps forever.

I have been an accidental resident of Islamabad as I was thrown into the sleepy folds of the capital by imperatives of securing a livelihood. Lahoris can never be content with any other city. But Islamabad’s serenity as a stark contrast to the urban mess of Pakistan was most endearing to say the least. Even its cultural wastelands were forgivable for the communion with Nature was a splendid alternative to civilisation. Thus the sprawling greenbelts of Islamabad and its wild foliage became a source of inspiration and muse. I left the city three years ago with fond memories.

But the return of this accidental native was not too charming. Islamabad over the last three years has confronted a development paradigm that reflects much of what is wrong with the elite-led progress in Pakistan. Whilst the political fissures have also erupted in the form of terrorism and activism around the issue of deposed judges, it is the brazen model of urban development that remains most worrisome.

Express-ways and highways have been built all over the place that can facilitate fast paced cars, cavalcades and power caravans. But the pedestrians who by even conservative estimates are 30 per cent of commuters find themselves at the wrong side of history. They have been virtually bypassed or at worst humiliated. Many of the express-ways have no provision of underground walkways or overhead bridges. Small wonder, that the absolute poor of Pakistan are also nearly the same percentage and almost as invisible.

The natural gifts of Islamabad have been mercilessly chopped in the name of widening the roads or even erecting senseless structures. Tracts of green areas that would bloom in the spring and sway in the monsoons have all gone. Barren squares reveal the idiocy of the initial layout of Islamabad that Nature had shielded for so long.

Where else in the world would find a public park space rented out to a global corporation and that too of dubious credentials such as the McDonalds. And, if the purpose was to entertain the hapless Islamabadites then why not patronise a local chain? This is crass commercialism being actively promoted by gurus of modernization and elites who find the global signs as a proof of having arrived. All of this has happened at the expense of the public aesthetic and values. Islamabad of today with its copycat musicals and made-to-order tourist villages is nothing but an attempt in cultural annihilation. Amazing that a city next to Gandhara and capital of the Indus valley terms Broadway remakes as high culture!

The original Islamabad-wallas remember how the CDA installed dustbins sported the chaste Urdu-Persian word Khashaak in bold. No more. It is now all English wonderland and a signpost on a major highway displays the route to “Atwar bazaar”. Since when has the mighty state language lost its relevance. If this was to be the future of Urdu, then why was there a need to alienate our fellow Pakistanis in the Eastern Wing now Bangladesh in the name of a uniform national language.

Believe it or not, Ramna, a Bengali name was used for the old sectors. If in the 1960s the Bengalis complained of excessive investments in Islamabad they were termed as traitors. Today, a similar fetish for capital investments in Islamabad remains unchanged. The complaints are muted often sidelined due to the bomb blasts and the glitz of highways and underpasses. In stark contrast, the poor relative town of Rawalpindi is quite neglected where a flood at Nullah Lai ravages segments of population and their livelihoods each year and where the martial and non-marital divides are difficult to overlook.

Islamabad continues to grow and is liked by many including the foreign diplomats thanks to its wondrous surroundings. But we are keen to make it a mess. Where have big roads and speed-ways been a substitute for traffic management and integrated urban planning? Even an undergraduate would know that. And, why is there no public transport system in place if this were the best that we want to showcase in the world.

While the entire country has been administered the magic dose of devolution, Islamabad remains ‘undevolved’ and its administration is highly centralized reflecting the culture of an overarching and central state. These are not accidental contradictions but symptoms of the larger malaise.

About time the Islamabadis woke up and shunned the flashy development for more substantive progress that includes the poor, creates livelihood beyond consumerism, saves the trees and focuses on long term urban vision rather than short term infrastructure feats.

A version of this post also appeared in the daily News.
Raza also blogs at PakTeaHouse, Lahorenama and taraqee

28 responses to “The Capital Shock”

  1. Isa Daudpota says:

    Islamabad was (when I looked into its governing structure) run by 8 anonymous individuals, five of whom were bureaucrats and the remaining three serving brigadiers. No public input was sought for any of the large projects that Kamran Lashari, the “hugely successful” chairman of the CDA and his team dreamed up.

    See my note, “Why CDA Fails” at:

    http://tinyurl.com/6sx4qe

    The sale of land and its development in earlier days generated funds that went into the public exchequer. Not so since Lashari took over – the money ends up in CDA’s coffers. It is now flushed with funds and can do pretty much what it likes with them. The more projects it sanctions the greater the flow of money into different black holes!

    Lashari may have already found new benefactors in the new government; he was earlier close to Shahbaz Sharif when they set about ‘beautifying’ Lahore. So will he survive the current change of government?

    One will have to wait a while to see if the PPP government can use Islamabad as a model for city development. Most people are, however, not holding their breath for this to happen!

    I do hope for positive change, an indication, perhaps, of my naivity. If it doesn’t happen, then this new planned city too will be destroyed like our older cities.

  2. umar tosheeb says:

    I dont know what you trying to complain about? This is exactly what happenes with excessive urbanization. Where do you think those extra cars would run, if the roads were not wide enough? The important thing is to strike some kind of balance with development and natural surroundings. Other than that this development is welcome, it creats more jobs, and creats better educational opportunities for people moving to cities.

  3. -Farid says:

    Fair enough. Yes I agree that it is never a simple ‘good’ or ‘bad’ thing, there are always several points to be looked into.

    I guess your impression is from your perspective and mine is from my own. But I did mention parks, Daman-e-koh and the new Rawal Lake picnic spot for that reason. All these development projects are not for car owners, so we’ve seen the city planners doing something for the car-less too (You can get public transport to the picnic spots, and you really have to go to the Rawal Lake picnic spot to see what I’m talking about).

    Also, just in passing, you appear to have picked on the one new sign in Islamabad (or one of very very few) that is English only. As far as I can tell – and I drive around quite a bit – all new signage is bilingual (English + Urdu). As the capital city with a lot of expat population, English makes sense – and as long as there is Urdu as well, which is there, it shouldn’t be an issue.

    But anyway, thanks for your acknowledgment – and I hope your next visit here is more enjoyable :)

  4. Raza Rumi says:

    Dear Sherbano, Saad and Shahid
    Many thanks for the comments. The figure of 33 billion is alarming. Can you check again please – it would be interesting to see how much has this cost the taxpayers.

    Farid: your comments are partly valid. Yes, the upgradation has improved the traffic flow in the short term. But all studies and research shows that traffic issues are not addressed by extending roads and building isolated highways in a city. there are other necessary conditions required such as taxation, road use planning, urban zoning etc to name a few.

    However, the most important question is whether a city is only for those who drive/own cars?? – this is a complex issue I guess and could have several perspectives and no simple answer.

    anyway, thanks for sharing your personal experience and your point of view is respectfully acknowledged.

  5. Shahid Saeed says:

    Islamabad as it was constructed as a capital should have been limited to the role of Washington D.C. Hosting the federal government and its institutions and not becoming a metropolis,

    Commercial centers and big office buildings for the corporate HQs of major companies are the biggest problem. Islamabad is growing at a very high rate, although its population should have been controlled and the capital city regulated it has been the subject of the brutal treatment of the misguided elite and has transformed into a soon to be smoggy aired metropolis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*