Does Pakistan Really Need More F-16s?

Posted on October 16, 2009
Filed Under >Imran H. Khan, Economy & Development, Foreign Relations, Law & Justice
48 Comments
Total Views: 81209

Imran H. Khan

On October 13, 2009 Air Chief Marshal Rao Qamar Suleman of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) participated in the rolling out ceremony of the first of 18 F-16C Block 52, one of the most capable versions of the aircraft, which is flown by the U.S. Air Force and numerous other countries.

U.S. Congressman Rep. Kay Granger (R-Fort Worth) said that Pakistan “is the point of the spear” in U.S. efforts to combat terrorism in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Pakistan has paid nearly $2 Billion for the aircrafts and parts. Between the Egyptian and Pakistani orders, the Lockheed plant should remain humming till 2012, employing 2,100.

ACM Suleman said that this type of aircraft has been valuable in delivering munitions with precision.

I am sure that the choice of type and number of planes must have been made with due considerations by the senior PAF staff and the Pakistan parliament. But there is something that deeply troubles me about this photograph (more photos here).

Does Pakistan really need $80Million aircraft to bomb the terrorists hiding in FATA and elsewhere?

As an ex-PAF officer myself and coming from a PAF family, I am a strong opponent of using air power to bomb civilian targets in the first place; as it causes unnecessary civilian deaths. The strengths of this plane are superior radar, long endurance and ability to deliver beyond visual range missiles. None of these attributes are needed for the troubles at hand.

The current PAF inventory could easily have been upgraded to handle newer precision weapons at a fraction of the cost. An even better option would be to spread the $80M over a combination of COIN (Counter Insurgency) aircrafts like those from Pilatus or Embraer, helicopters and Unmanned Aircraft Vehicles UAVs. These types of planes would provide the eyes (uavs), mobility (helicopters) and teeth (COIN aircrafts) to an organization like Army Aviation or Frontier Constabulary Air Force. Air power should only be used for close air support of security forces.

Moreover, there is no transfer of technology involved that I am aware of. PAF should focus on evolving JF-17 that it has developed in collaboration with China. Modern jet fighters are a combination of platform, avionics and weapons. JF-17 is an adequate platform. We tend to suffer from short memory. It was only 1965 when US embargoed all military support and PAF had to replace its predominant US inventory with Chinese jets. My father was the first air attaché to Beijing and over saw the incredible Chinese support at the time of our needs.

Even better, given the sad state of primary education in Pakistan, this money could have educated half the school going kids for an year. Right now we only provide money for one out of forty children in our budget.

Additionally, this ceremony could not have come at a worse time as Pakistanis are actively debating the nature of US Pakistan relationship under the Obama administration. There are many in Pakistan who feel that the Kerry-Lugar bill’s language is an interference in the internal affairs of the country. F-16 could come to represent the Symbol of Subservience rather than that of pride.

Article 245 of the Constitution of Pakistan states:

The Armed Forces shall, under the directions of the Federal Government, defend Pakistan against external aggression or threat of war, and, subject to law, act in aid of civil power when called upon to do so.

Right now Pakistanis are being bombed by an external aggressor (US Drones flown by CIA) and being blown up in terrorist attacks from an internal aggressor on a nearly daily basis. Would ACM Suleman be present in Fort Worth if he was fulfilling his Constitutional obligation?

Imran Khan is an ex-PAF officer and technology entrepreneur who blogs at Planet Earth.

48 responses to “Does Pakistan Really Need More F-16s?”

  1. ShahidnUSA says:

    The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys.

  2. shakeel says:

    While it is true that air raids cause many civilians deaths, it is also true that one has no choice but use that advantage of air over the terrorists.

    Pak army was successful in Swat due to these air raids and hopefully, will have the same result in this new operation vs the terrorists. Of course, with the technology of Drones that Pak now has (although they are not fitted with missiles but are only for information purposes), these air raids are more specific and cause less civilians deaths.

    One can read up more on Pak drones here:

    http://theasiandefence.blogspot.com/2009/10/pakist an-turns-to-drones-of-its-own.html

    Pak needs F-16’s and even more of these. Like Qaid E Azzam said: a strong country needs a strong air force.

  3. Meet the Patriots says:

    >>>>Don’t forget that non-supply of F-16’s was the main complaint Pakistanis have had against USA since 1990, now finally you are getting the aircraft and again you complain ??!

    I think that is an unfair comment directed at Imran. I am not one of Imran’s fans but he has makes a valid point. The parked and obsolete F-16s had become a liability for America. Therefore it was in America’s own interest to dump them on Pakistan. The agenda of ‘punishing’ Pakistan by with-holding the F-16s was just not working. Besides the world has moved on since the ’90’s. Seeing the success of the JF-17 thunder, America wants Pakistan to once again become dependent on its unwanted junk so that aid (‘spare parts’) can be stopped again whenever Pakistan does not toe the line. May be we will soon discover that there were other incentives for Mr 10% to have accepted a fleet of US jets unsuitable for the Republic of Chad when India has acquired AWACS, nuclear submarines, satellites and the nuclear deal from America and elsewhere. Moreover in the recent dog-fights with India, the US Air Force has already educated Indians on how to deal with F-16s. I also read somewhere that France had offered a similar deal to Pakistan when Sarkozy was about to visit but Zardari did not get enough commission. Therefore Zardari not only did not want the nuclear technology deal he even cancelled Sarkozy’s visit. That is what defines Pakistan’s national interest.

  4. DARWEESH says:

    While preparing a country,s defence strategies, the top management has to go by geo-political realities.
    Bharat(India) has never accepted the Two Nation Theory in Indo-Pak Subcontinent which resulted in the creation of a Muslim state of Pakistan and further got the strength by a Muslim Bengal state (Bangla Desh) on Bharat,s eastern borders.So she has always been planning to get this undone.
    Pakistan strategists had to plan a counter offence strategy thus F16 ,Nuclear bombs became necessatity for us.
    Though its neither in Bharats interests nor in our interests to keep teeming millions hungry and uneducated, but for the mistrust between two nations, we are in a situation where both countires need political sagacity of great leaders/statesmen of the status of Quid-e-Azam and Mahatma Gandhi.
    Both nations have hundreds of political clowns but dont have real political stalwarts, so bleak future for our future generations.
    May Allah bless Pakistan, Ameen.

  5. naive says:

    This F16 deal is not based on what Pakistan needs and what makes sense. Any deal of this magnitude is never based on needs and wants. I think the audience should know… this is Pakistan!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*