Adil Najam
This is a painful post to write.
Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.
I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”
But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.
I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.
Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.
But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.
I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.
Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.
But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.
I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.
The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.




















































Powerful ideas here.
I am heartened to read your take on this. Bigots are everywhere and we have plenty in the US too who try to spread hatred. The only way to deal with them is to ignore them and not to encourage them by giving them more importance than they deserve.
I truly don’t care whether someone draws Mohammad. What I can’t fathom is why the Lahore High Court ordered the Department of Communications to block Facebook through the end of May.
Is this what it has come to? Are Pakistanis so volatile that they cannot be trusted to trusted to maintain their composure through something as inane as a Facebook group? It is sad that we allow the government to encroach on our access to information. First YouTube, now Facebook. What’s next?
Absolutely brilliant.
Love this part, can we somehow get the FB people to read this:
“Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.””
So I asked a friend what she thought about this article and she said:
S says:
*okay claim 1) that by telling other ppl to ban the page we sort of promote them
S says:
*well one, as they say, no publicity is bad publicity
*and number two, its called the streisand effect
S says:
*ppl say just ignore it theyll dwinadling dwn
*honestly, if were standing in front of Allah and He asked that you knew someone was going to insult my prophet yet you did nothing
S says:
*rather i think we should fight back, even if it provokes them furthur simple because we have to show ppl this isnt worth taking lightly
*if we ignored it, then it will become just like what isa alahis salam has become
S says:
*where ppl make fun of him and use him constatly in their media etc. for jokes etc
*not to insult chrisitans but just because hes a famous figure who is not off bounds
K says:
*YES!
*exactly
S says:
*to be honest, everyone shold boycott facebook forever
*or at least for longer than one day
K says:
*im goign to post this convo on the comment section
K says:
*in the article
When shame is gone, no disrespects seems bad enough.
What Muslims fail to realise is that ultimately they have no one to blame but themselves. Hindus, Christians, Jews and Buddhists do not protest, riot, threaten and scream over pictures and cartoons. Muslims need a dignified understanding of what freedom of speech means, and whether or not you agree or disagree with something does not change the fact that greater society does not have to follow your own religious rules.
Muslims must understand that resolving problems by screaming and throwing tantrums is not an appropriate solution for “enlightened” people; it only represents the embarrassing reality of what Islam represents itself as today; and no one but Muslims themselves are to blame for this. Civilised society has grown restless at the fact that Muslims have a different way of solving their problems, it is not through intelligence or dialogue but through throwing tantrums and screaming loudest – this road does not yield results.