Adil Najam
Gen. Pervez Musharraf’s much anticipated autobiography, In the Line of Fire, will officially be released in a few hours. It will be launched at a signing ceremony at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York. [Earlier ATP posts here, here and here].
The build-up - whether intended by the publisher, Simon and Schuster, or not - has been quite phenomenal. Even US President George Bush got into the act by suggesting (even if jokingly) that people should buy the book. Meanwhile, all sorts of controversies - ranging from debates about what Richad Armitage did or did not say, to the possibility to President Musharraf having health problems, the frenzy about a coup in Pakistan that ran amock Sunday, to speculations about India’s reactions - have all helped fuel the chatter (as have discussions like this one!).
The result is that as of this writing, the book has now climbed to No. 28 on the Amazon.com best-selling list, where it is selling now for $16.80 (market price $28). One expects that it will rise further on this and other lists in the coming days.
Anticipated as the book is, the chatter around the book is now getting to be as interesting as anything that may be in the book. Here is a sampling…
Writing in the Daily Times, veteran journalist Khalid Hasan provides this insight to who actually said what to whom on the Armitage Affair:
Richard Armitage, Daily Times can confirm, did not use the words attributed to him by President Pervez Musharraf in a CBS 60 Minutes interview, namely that unless Pakistan did American bidding, it will be bombed into the “stone age�. However, neither the President of Pakistan, nor Richard Armitage, who has denied using such language, nor President Bush who said he was “taken aback� when he learnt what had been said, is being untruthful. What actually happened was that after his meeting with Richard Armitage, Lt Gen Mahmood Ahmed – who now wears a long, white beard and has reportedly gone Tableeghi – called Gen Musharraf from the Pakistan embassy in Washington. The conversation took place in Urdu and when the president asked him what the bottom line of the American message was, Gen Mahmood replied in Urdu that the Americans were intent on the removal of the Taliban regime and would not let Pakistan stand in their way and if Pakistan did not fall in line and cooperate, “wo hamari eent se eent baja dey gain� or words to that effect. That being so, President Musharraf’s recollection of the conversation with Gen Mahmood, who was then the director general of the ISI, is accurate, only he translated into English what he had been told in Urdu. It is time for Gen Mahmood to go on record and reproduce exactly the words in which he conveyed the Armitage message to Gen Musharraf on that September day five years ago.
The Daily Dawn adds this insight:
Mr Armitage who met Gen Musharraf in his hotel in Washington insisted that he had never used such a language and President Bush who met the general at the White House also expressed surprise at the revelation and asked “why now after five years and why in New York? “The answer, to quote President Bush, is: “He wants you to buy his book.�
Meanwhile, as various leaks come out, here is one with some details on the events of October 1999, again from a report in the Daily Times:
On October 12, 1999, the one hour between 6:45 and 7:45 in the evening, Pakistan’s history changed dramatically, President Pervez Musharraf writes in ‘In The Line of Fire’. In some exclusive excerpts from an advance manuscript of the book, Musharraf talks about the dramatic circumstances in which he became the leader of Pakistan.
“It was October 12, 1999. The time was 6:45pm. The flight was PK 805. The plane was an Airbus. There were 198 passengers on board, many of them school children. We were due to land in 10 minutes,� he writes. But then prime minister Nawaz Sharif had given explicit orders that the flight should not be allowed to land anywhere in Pakistan. ‘I told a crew member to ask Air Traffic Control again why they were not permitting us to land considering our precarious fuel situation. The reply, ‘Climb to 21,000 feet and just get out of Pakistan and go anywhere.’
“Air Traffic Control suggested we head to Bombay, Oman, Abu Dhabi, or Bandar Abbas in Iran, just about anywhere except (for some reason) Dubai. They also informed our pilot that they had directed all airports not to let our plane land anywhere in Pakistan. No one below the prime minister could give such a drastic order. Sacking an army chief is one thing, but hijacking his plane and sending it to India is diabolical.� As the news of a political coup dawned on him, Musharraf said his army rallied behind him. They were launching a counter coup.
“Maj Gen Malik Iftikhar Ali Khan, the commander of an army division in Karachi, made radio contact with the aircraft. ‘Tell the chief to come back and land in Karachi,’ he told the pilot. ‘Everything is alright now.’ “By 7:45pm, the counter coup had defeated Nawaz Sharif’s coup throughout the country. My plane landed in Karachi by 7:48pm,� said Musharraf. “Back in corps headquarters in Karachi, we were somewhat dazed. We decided not to do anything precipitate. What was needed first and foremost was to reassure a bewildered nation, but without making any rash promises until we had understood what we got into.�
While we will all soon know much more than this, the fight over the words will not end. This from the Indian Express:
…an urgent e-mail from New York arrived on Sunday at the office of a Delhi publisher who is working overtime on the Hindi translation of the book. The email said the “authorâ€Â? wants to review portions on the Kargil operation in the translated version and the same should be sent to him immediately. After the uproar created by his remarks in the CBS show 60 Minutes that after 9/11, the US had threatened to “bombâ€Â? Pakistan “back to the Stone Ageâ€Â? if it didn’t support the war against the Taliban, it’s learnt that Musharraf wants to be “very carefulâ€Â? on what is being published and how. On this score, he wants to be sure that what goes into the Hindi translation of the book is an accurate description of the original. The Kargil chapters have been mailed back to the author and printing won’t start until his all clear comes.
By the way, in case you are wondering, yes, an Urdu version is also in the works.
@ Pakexpat:my sentiments exactly. I wanted to post this editorial from Dawn, but thanks for already having done so. @ Adil, I’m dissapointed with the “coverage” you have provided to Gen Musharraf’s visit. The right hand column of ATP looks like an out and out PR exercise for the General. Sad.
I would quote from the editorial of DAWN today which says a lot.
http://dawn.com/2006/09/26/ed.htm#2
[quote post="324"]THE much hyped In the Line of Fire, President Pervez Musharraf’s memoirs, could well go down in the Guinness Book of Records for many ‘firsts’ which it appears set to achieve. Probably no other book has had such a large amount spent on its promotion â€â€? much of it at state expense â€â€? as the president’s autobiography. Although projected as an official visit to the US, the trip is increasingly appearing to be a book promotion launching tour. Few authors enjoy the privilege of 70 odd companions, including 10 federal ministers, travelling with them on such an occasion, which the publishing industry regards as no more than a marketing tactic. In this context, one would not be wrong to wonder if the president’s much publicised “bombed to the Stone Age” comment in a CBS interview was also designed to excite curiosity about the content of the book. For once President George Bush had it right when he interpreted President Musharraf’s refusal to elucidate his comment, as “buy the book is what he is saying”. After all, the publishers of the book, Simon & Schuster, are the publishing arm of CBS which conducted the interview.
There is also a serious political dimension to a sitting president writing a book on his version of politics, strategy and foreign policy in the first person. Apart from the author’s own “master and mentor”, President Ayub Khan, no world leader of any standing has penned his autobiography while in office. Others have recorded their life experiences only in retirement. Even in Pakistan when bureaucrats and army generals display a love for the written word, they take up the pen with an unprecedented force of eloquence only when they step down. Is the president entitled to take a public stance on important issues some of which may still be officially classified and state secrets â€â€? at least for 30 years under the law? Obviously, his will be a one-sided account and in the absence of authentic and documented information on the events about which he has written, the book will stir controversy. Worse still, each and every word can have a profound impact on state policy and the country’s external relations, coming as it does from the presidential pen. Maulana Azad understood the implications of the written word better. He instructed his publisher not to print some sensitive passages in his book India Wins Freedom until 30 years after the author’s death.[/quote]
Are the bloggers cum intellectuals that frequent these websites bothered about these issues.
Mush is trying to use all tactics to sell his book.
Mush and his childhood affairs :D
Last night I was watching a talk show on Geo TV discussing the currently topic of “Bombing into stone age”. One of the panelists was Riaz Khokhar, a former foreign secretary and an experienced and a credible diplomat. He said he knew Armitage through his several meetings with him, and that it was very unlikely that he used these words. He said, he thought it was an embellishment, most likely done by General Mehmood.
One wishes General Mehmood steps up and gives his version. According to Khalid Hasan, he has now turned Tableeghi and has grown a long beard. So, he should make a credible witness. Shouldn’t he?
It now seems evident that there WAS a clear threat from the US. That is not surprising. What is interesting is whether this revalation will help or hurt jernail ji IN PAKISTAN. Did we do what we did becasue it was good for Paksitan? Or because we were forced into it? His answer seems to be, ‘both’!
Seems its a new fashion in world of Pakistani politics. What do you say about yusuf gilani’s book ‘Chahe Yousuf…” I don’t remember the whole title which seems a misra of iqbal. :)
I hope the intellectuals among us don’t start using the book as a source of factual information. Its an autobiography, Musharraf will come out as a Knight in shining armour.
I wonder when is Shortcut Aziz planning his book because he snatched the economy from the teeth of bankruptcy.
Well - he got what he wanted a #1 best, all at our expense. He flies around the US giving speeches and casually plugging his book, then casually again, oops once more.
Now hes got a decent winner on his hand, the revelations are important but one must remember all these details will divert his attention to clarifying the past as quoted in his book rather then dealing with the future of Pakistan. Undoubtedly the book will serve as an important record of what transpired in the seven years, but I feel its a distraction.
This trip to the US is now a book trip and NOT for Pakistan. A sad waste of money just to help the publisher make a handsome profit while we sit twirling our fingers without electricity. What an Irony