Custom Search

JUI’s Verdict: Jinnah was Not a “Real Freedom Fighter”

Posted on February 9, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, History, People, Politics
186 Comments
Total Views: 16527

Adil Najam

Mohamed Ali Jinnah, it seems, was not a “real freedom fighter” and he did “nothing for Islam.” (On Jinnah, see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).
So says the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI). And by what logic does Maulana Fazlur Rehman and his party come to this conclusion? According to the party spokesman: ““Jinnah was not imprisoned during the independence struggle. That is why he did nothing worth remembering.â€Â?

I am left rather speechless. So, here is the news item from Daily Times (February 9, 2007) that reports on the matter:

The Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) will celebrate 2007 by paying tribute to the heroes who played an important role in the independence of Pakistan ignoring Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and his companions, JUI officials told Daily Times on Thursday. They said that the party would hold conventions in Peshawar and other cities of the NWFP in March to highlight the services of ‘real freedom fighters’.

“The decision to this effect was taken at the meeting of the JUI executive council in Lahore a couple of days ago. National Assembly Opposition Leader Maulana Fazlur Rehman presided over the meeting,� they added. JUI information secretary Maulana Amjad Khan said that Jinnah and his companions would not be commemorated because they had not done anything for Islam. “Jinnah was not imprisoned during the independence struggle. That is why he did nothing worth remembering,� Khan added.

He said the JUI would remember only those leaders who had sacrificed their lives for the creation of Pakistan or who had been imprisoned by the British Raj. JUI leader Qari Nazir Ahmed said the party would remember Hussain Maulana Ahmed Madni, Maulana Qasim Nanotri, Maulana Ubaid Ullah Sindhi, Maulana Mehmoodul Hassan, Syed Ahmed Shaheed, Shah Ismael Shaheed, Mauala Rasheed Ahmed and other leaders, who had rendered great sacrifices for the creation of Pakistan. “Maulana Qasim Nanotri established the Madrasa Darul Uloom Deoband. The institute produced a large number of freedom fighters,� Qari Nazir added. He said a schedule for conventions in the Punjab had not been decided yet. JUI Lahore chapter ameer Maulana Muhibun Nabi said the party would also arrange programmes in Lahore in this connection.

Interesting, by the way, that it seems that to be a “real freedom fighter” you have ‘Maulana’ prefixed before your name or a ‘Shaheed’ as a suffix.

Note: My thank to Watandost for alerting me to this rewriting of history.

186 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 2423 22 21 20 [19] 18 17 16 151 »

  1. Mubarak says:
    February 23rd, 2007 1:26 am

    Thank you JUI. You have exposed yourselves. Now do something more stupid so that the masses reject you once and for all.

  2. Raheem says:
    February 23rd, 2007 12:54 am

    You are right. We are making these JUI maulvis more important than they are.

    Everyone else has even forgotten about this but we keep their discussion and their agenda alive.

  3. Mubarak says:
    February 23rd, 2007 12:39 am

    [quote comment="35056"]why should it matter to anyone if these JUI jokers think Jinnah is a real freedom fighter or not. Is there word really so important to us that we worry about it so much.

    Let them say whatever they want and let them make fools of themselves![/quote]

    Correct, Nobody gives a damn whether or not they think of Jinnah as a Freedom Fighter. Quaid-e-Azam was the only person in the political history of this country who had the real knowledge of Governing by Islam i.e. by “Justice, Fairplay, Impartiality”.

    No wonder what these mullahs say because as per Bukhari’s Hadith ” There will be a time when the religious leaders would be the most worst beings in the world and all fitna would begin by them and would ultimately return to them” so it is a prophecy which is bound to happen.

  4. Muslim bin Muslim says:
    February 22nd, 2007 2:56 am

    I’m just here to do dawa’h with the best of my ability.

    Can you please take you dawa’h baazi somewhere else. Why impose your perverted beliefs on others.

    Aap khud musalman howeaye janab, ameen.

  5. Muneer says:
    February 22nd, 2007 2:52 am

    Ali, ther is no surprise at al that these JUI maulanas are saying what they are saying.

    The surprise is that so many people seem to believe them. Have you noticed how many people here are defending the JUI leaders and how many are refusing to just simply say that the JUI view is wrong. So they twist and turn things into being about religious or non religoous or whatever. But never condemn what the JUI is saying. So they are really agreeing with JUI.

    That is real surprise.

  6. Ali says:
    February 22nd, 2007 2:24 am

    why should it matter to anyone if these JUI jokers think Jinnah is a real freedom fighter or not. Is there word really so important to us that we worry about it so much.

    Let them say whatever they want and let them make fools of themselves!

  7. Bundagi says:
    February 21st, 2007 7:49 pm

    I must say i find this rather amusing…i mean these mullahs lauding only the mullahs…we should perhaps teach them what tolerance is all about by tolerating such antics…after all no matter what they may say they cannot change history…they can wear their glasses to look back at history and we can stick to the facts;)

  8. Baber says:
    February 21st, 2007 7:40 pm

    At least liberals don’t promote the culture of hate in society. Nobody should be hated based on religion/sect or caste differences.

Comment Pages: « 2423 22 21 20 [19] 18 17 16 151 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!