Pakistani Universities and Their Web Presence

Posted on October 27, 2007
Filed Under >Junaid Siddiqui, Education, Science and Technology
32 Comments
Total Views: 13866

Junaid Siddiqui

Last year at ATP, there was a post on the HEC (Higher Education Commission)’s Ranking of Pakistani Universities. That single post generated so much interest that in the past one year it has got 30000 hits on it. It not only shows the immense interest among prospective university students but also shows lack of career counseling or guidance available to them.

I have written this article in a hope of building further on HEC’s rankings as well as to show that Pakistani universities have very far to go to make up to any internationally recognized University Ranking.

Spanish National Research Council biannually publishes Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. The raking is based on data obtained from popular search engines. Universities for this purpose are identified based on their institutional web domains. The methodology of ranking is based on the following quantitative indicators:

Size (S). Number of pages from a university’s domain recovered from search engines.
Visibility (V). The total number of unique external links received (inlinks) by a university’s site.
Rich Files (R). Number of rich files available on a university’s domain recovered from search engines. The file types considered include Adobe Acrobat (.pdf), PostScript (.ps), Microsoft Word (.doc) and Microsoft Powerpoint (.ppt). This is considered as it is relevant to academic and publication activities of a university.
Scholar (Sc). Number of papers and citations for a university’s domain available on Google Scholar.

Following formula is used to rank universities:
Webometrics Rank (position)= 4*RankV+2*RankS+1*RankR+1*RankSc

The ranking criteria is quantitative is nature for which data can be easily obtained through some simple search engine queries. What is, however, interesting to note about the ranking results (last published in July 2007) is that they compare rather well with other world rankings of universities such as the Shanghai Jiao Tong University ranking or The Times World University Rankings.

SESRTCIC, a research center of OIC, has recently released a preliminary Academic Ranking of Universities in the OIC Countries, which is based on the research output data of the universities of OIC member states. Most of the top ranking Middle Eastern universities in the composite index of OIC ranking are also among the top Middle Eastern universities in the Webometrics ranking. The Webometrics ranking, therefore, seems to be a good indicator of global standing of a university.

Given that Webometrics ranking is based on quantitative parameters we can expect that a populous country like Pakistan should have at least few of its universities, let us say, in the top 2000. However when we look at the Webometrics ranking of Pakistani universities, it is disappointing to see that there are no universities in even top 3000 and there are only two universities in top 4000 rankings. They are Lahore University of Management Sciences (rank 3071), Aga Khan University, Karachi (rank 3422) and the Punjab University, Lahore (rank 4685).

Universities form the centers of intellectual and scholarly activities in any country and the Webometrics ranking of our universities is an indicator of the dismal situation we have in our country. Interestingly the two universities in top 4000 (LUMS and AKU) are the same universities that Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy identified as the two Pakistani universities closest to the universities located in free societies across the world.

Independent thought is the foundation that allows intellectual activities to flourish which seems to be missing from the fabric of most of our higher education institutions. The recent article on BBCUrdu.com about the kind of thoughts promoted at our long established Karachi University is one example of what is happening at our universities.

Whether it be the education in the disciplines of natural sciences or social sciences the situation is the same. When we go into the classrooms what we find is an environment that restricts the thinking of our students than opening it up. This is yet another aspect of our society which needs immediate and radical measures.

About the Author: Junaid Siddiqui is a Civil Engineering graduate of NED University Karachi and now a lecturer at King Fahad University of Petroleum and Minerals.

32 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 4 3 [2] 1 »

  1. Eidee Man says:
    October 28th, 2007 12:57 am

    Very good article; I’m always very interested in articles about higher education in Pakistan. And certainly, with the likes of Adil Najam, etc we have writers of authority.

    Anyway, it’s hard to admit, but India is doing much better in higher education than Pakistan. Think about it, if Pakistan just had two PITs based on the model of IITs in India (which are in turn based on MIT, arguably the most elite technical school in the world). These schools have completely different organizational structures, with almost not interference from government, and they have nation-wide admissions exams.

    The Aga Khan Medical College produces batch upon batch of extremely talented physicians who land residencies in the most elite residency programs in the world including at Mass General, Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, etc. There is no reason why we cannot have a technical school of similar caliber….who knows, maybe the LUMS SSE project will do that for Pakistan….I sure hope so, hopefully I can get a faculty position there when I graduate :-).

  2. Junaid Siddiqui says:
    October 28th, 2007 12:53 am

    Owais I agree that several simple steps can be taken to improve web presence of our universities. Realizing the value of open access to thoughts and idea and the free flow of ideas is yet another factor that makes a difference. Just look at the impact a single Blog like ATP has made. ATP has a web presence comparable to LUMS.

    Pages in Yahoo at the moment

    LUMS: 10, 800
    http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http %3A%2F%2Flums.edu.pk&bwm=p&bwms=p&fr2=seo-rd-se

    ATP: 11,300
    http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http %3A%2F%2Fpakistaniat.com&bwm=p&bwms=p&fr2=seo-rd-s e

    External Inlinks at the moment

    LUMS: 2850
    http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=h ttp%3A%2F%2Fpakistaniat.com&bwm=i&bwmo=d&bwmf=s

    ATP: 15,800
    http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/advsearch?p=h ttp%3A%2F%2Fpakistaniat.com&bwm=i&bwmo=d&bwmf=s

    Add some blogs to the culture of any university and it can have great impact in every sense.

  3. Junaid Siddiqui says:
    October 28th, 2007 12:06 am

    Looking at the university web presence data it made me reflect that what it is that makes a good university to produce more on the web. One factor that I believe makes the real difference is the sheer amount of “Activity” that happens at a good university. Activity means that someone is doing something. But then when we are at an institution like a university we do not do alone. We work within a community and we work with our community. The results in a synergy that has a much greater impact than if each of the individual would be working alone.

    It is not so much about the money than about our attitudes that we have in our society. In contrast to many western individualistic societies our society gives much more value to living with families. But when it comes to working together it does not take much time for the problems to emerge. Let alone the issue of the government at the country level, you can find mohalla (district) level societies not been able to perform because of petty conflicts among few individuals. Mahmood has rightly pointed out the politics we have at our universities which make many people who want to perform to shy away. Even if we take our favorite game of cricket and ask an outside person what they would like to say about it, one factor that often mentioned is the politics as an inhibiting factor to the better performance of the team.

    We need to find ways to reduce inhibitions for working together. For that we need to have trust on each other. That requires each individual to be more responsible about him or herself. We talk about freedom. We need to talk more about responsibilities.

  4. Owais Mughal says:
    October 27th, 2007 11:50 pm

    Junaid, You have pointed us to a valid failure of our universities. It is very interesting how Webometrics rank universities on a formula based on their web foot mark.

    As far as Webometrics is concerned, one obvious way to increase Pakistani universities ranking could be to digitize their paper research work and make it available online.

    I know for Pak Engineering Universities atleast that each and every student has to work on a final project. for many students, it takes almost 18-24 months to finish this project. On many ( but not all) genuine research is performed by the students but their work all ends up in a paper form in a project library and gets ‘imprisoned’ there forever. All these final projects should be required to be available online also (atleast the abstracts/summaries). Just this step will increas Pak universities digital foot print on the web.

  5. Viqar Minai says:
    October 27th, 2007 7:55 pm

    I agree. The budget is being mis-spent in a lot of categories. All that money should be taken away and allocated to the military budget instead so our brave soldier can kill more of us.

  6. October 27th, 2007 5:32 pm

    Reducing military budget will not ensure education budget will be spend as planned. The system needs to be improved. Its not the amount that matter, its the way that amount is spent , matters. We are a 3rd world country, but our budget doesn’t reflect that, the lavishness of the elite and ruling class burdens the budget and public bears that expense. Military budget should not be reduced when it is spent to improve the military strength, it should be reduced when it is spend for mere display of lavishness.

    Furthermore, due to our corrupt system, I don’t think the allocated educational budget has been wisely used. So just allocating more and more for education will only benefit the culprits of the system, by increasing their pocket money.
    :)

  7. Usman says:
    October 27th, 2007 5:09 pm

    I totally agree with pa(kiss)tani at his comparison between Harvard and the Taj Mahal (a total waste of time/countless amount of wealth) .

    But still I dont need to go that far in the history, Pakistan’s ruling elite is here to show us that Taj Mahal history is still being followed in the present day, with no damn to building something of a new educational place (university??? hmmmmm , I’m not talking about…… this country is still in dire need of primary schools in its rural areas)

  8. mansoor says:
    October 27th, 2007 2:45 pm

    Are the IITs and IIMs really better than any College in Pakistan? I dont think so. any inputs?

Comment Pages: « 4 3 [2] 1 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!