India-Pakistan Samjhota Express Blast: 60+ Dead

Posted on February 19, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Disasters, Foreign Relations, Law & Justice
143 Comments
Total Views: 65679

Adil Najam

In a tragic development – and what is clearly the most serious threat to recent headways in the India-Pakistan peace process – a train bound from India to Pakistan (Samjhota Express) caught fire, reportedly because of two crude home-made bombs which exploded. Over 60 people are reported dead, most of them Pakistanis returning home, but the death toll also includes many Indians, including some Indian officials.

Another casualty could be the recently revived India-Pakistan peace process. The dastardly incident comes days before Pakistani Foreign Minister Khursheed Kasuri was to arrive in New Delhi to move the peace process forward. Indian Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav points out that “the aim is… to put hurdles into the path of the peace process that has started between the two neighbouring countries — India and Pakistan.” (Watch video report here).

Here are some details, according to the BBC:

At least 64 people have been killed in a series of explosions and a fire on a Pakistan-bound train in the northern Indian state of Haryana, officials say. Passengers reported hearing two blasts as the train passed near Panipat, about 80km (50 miles) north of Delhi. The train – the Samjhauta Express – was part of a service taking passengers from Delhi to Lahore in Pakistan. A spokesman for Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said the explosions were probably an “act of terror”. A number of other passengers were injured, and officials say the death toll may rise. The Samjhauta Express is one of two train services connecting India and Pakistan. After a two-year gap, it was reopened in 2004 as part of the peace process between the two countries.

Bloomberg adds the following information:

The blasts, which occurred after 11 p.m. last evening, were caused by crude explosives and struck two coaches of the train, India’s Railways Minister Lalu Prasad told reporters today in a televised interview in New Delhi. Pakistan condemned the blasts, saying India must conduct a thorough investigation into the act of terrorism. The train service between Indian and Pakistan is used by people who can’t afford air travel between the nuclear-armed neighbors that fought three wars since independence from British rule in 1947 and started talks to improve relations in 2003. The divided Himalayan territory of Kashmir is at the center of a dispute between the two countries that claim the region in full….

“Preliminary investigations show most of the victims are Pakistanis,” Pakistan’s foreign ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said in a phone interview from capital Islamabad today. “We expect India to conduct a thorough inquiry to find out the reasons behind this act.” The Pakistan High Commission in the Indian capital is being informed about possible casualties, zonal railways official B.N. Mathur said. A railway guard manning a signal cabin on the route between Delhi and Attari heard two explosions when the train crossed the station near Panipat, a refinery town, Mathur told reporters from the blast site….

India had the responsibility of providing security to the train in its part of the country, Aslam said, refusing to comment on the impact of the blasts on peace talks between the two countries. “We don’t know the motive behind the blasts.”

Pakistan has recently seen a spate of bombings in its major cities, and even before this some in government were pointing towards a ‘foreign hand’ in these bombings. Both countries have long played this game of ‘blame the foreign hand’, including in the recent tragic train bombings in Mumbai. The impulse to do so at the first sign of trouble is a natural one in the sub-continent. Given the deep distrust that exists between the two, it may even be understandable. But irrespective of the short-term political gains such finger-pointing might gain, it is not a very useful way to deal with deep tensions. One certainly hopes that this will not slide to that level and if, indeed, the purpose of those who did this terrible act was to hurt the peace process, then both countries will work together to make sure that this does not happen.

It is a good sign that Pakistan has announced that the visit by the Pakistan Foreign Minister to India will not be canceled. The signals from the Pakistan Foreign Ministry are sober but reasonable. According to The News:

Pakistan Foreign Minister Khurshid Kasuri Monday condemned a train blast in India which killed at least 66 people as a “horrendous act of terrorism” and said most of the victims were Pakistanis. Kasuri said he had asked the Indian government to investigate the incident overnight on a Samjhota Express. “It is a horrendous act of terrorism,” Kasuri told reporters during a function at the foreign office. “I would like the Indian government to investigate this incident. We are waiting for the results of the investigation,” he said. The minister said he had instructed the Pakistani High Commission in New Delhi to send staff to the site to help Pakistan nationals caught up in the blast.

The main leaders in India, including the Prime Minister and President, have also sent the right signals, including condolences to those who have died. The overtures from both sides are to focus on finding the terrorists who committed this atrocity. One hopes that their attentions will remain focussed on this purpose rather than succumbing to the impulse of scoring political points through the unwarranted politics of incrimination. Most of all, one hopes that neither country will allow the peace process to be derailed by this blast.

143 responses to “India-Pakistan Samjhota Express Blast: 60+ Dead”

  1. Naveed Siraj says:

    Politicians have mostly refrained from taking political mileage from this incident; readers of this blog have however needlessly gone into familiar territory of the blame game. The following has a lesson for all of us

    QUOTE
    “Indian trooper died rescuing passengers in fire-bombed train”

    NEW DELHI, Feb 20 (AFP) An Indian soldier on board the fire-bombed “Friendship Expressâ€

  2. bhitai says:

    Laloo should resign. If the door hadn’t jammed fewer lives would have been lost.

    Rs. 1 million per deceased person is a joke. Isn’t it the same india that intends to put a rocket on the moon in the coming decade or so? why so little value for human life? (shouldn’t india behave more like a developed nation, as opposed to say a 3rd world country like pakistan in this regard).

  3. Aqil Sajjad says:

    “Islamic terrorism is institutionalized, it is preached and practiced by mainstream religious and political parties, it is supported by religious texts and it has been adopted as State Policy by various muslim countries from time to time.”

    Impirialism and military occupation is similarly institutionalized, supported and justified by mainstream political parties and maintained as state policy.
    Just because it is not supported on religious grounds and some other phony justifications like ‘weapons of mass destruction, liberating people from a dictater, or ‘Kashmir is our atoot-ang’ does not mean it is not institutionalized, preached by mainstream parties, adopted as state policy and used to stirr hatred.

    Farukh:
    Like some others on this forum, I am not here to pick an endless fight with those who are only interested in ridiculing others, making extreme statements, distorting what others have said and then blasting them for what they have not said. I will only quote two sentences from a previous post of mine, if you read them a couple of times and compare their meaning with the sarcastic and provocative remark just posted by yourself, you will yourself see (if you choose) that you have totally distorted my whole argument, after that, if you are interested in a serious discussion, I am willing to engage with you, but if you are only interested in passing sarcastic remarks, then please go pick a fight with someone else.

    The quotes from my previous post:
    “There is more to it than just the origin of terror stories in Pakistan. Pakistan has also become a convenient whipping boy for everyone involved in the region to blame their glaring misdeeds on.”

    And the statement by Farukh:
    “and the fact that there IS a history of terrorism in and by Pakistanis has nothing to do with it!”

    Last time I checked, the words ‘nothing to do with it’ and ‘also’ were understood to have a very different meaning.

  4. YLH says:

    Oh yes Farrukh. We know an Indian could never do it. Just like Muslims were incapable of 9/11 … right?

  5. Farrukh says:

    Aqil and others….

    and the fact that there IS a history of terrorism in and by Pakistanis has nothing to do with it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*