The Battle for Lal Masjid Constinues: Another Blast in Islamabad, 12 Killed

Posted on July 27, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice
89 Comments
Total Views: 138421

Adil Najam

As the mosque formerly known as Lal Masjid was opened for Friday prayers again, things moved back towards mayhem. A major blast – possibly a suicide attack – rocked Islamabad right near the mosque, protesters went wild triggering police response, multiple people have been killed and the attempt to bring the Capital back to normalcy was again scuttled by extremists.

Picture from BBCPicture from BBCPicture from BBC
Picture from BBC
Picture from BBC
Picture from BBCPicture from BBC



New reports suggest that as many as 12 15 have already died and the number is expected to rise. According to a recent AP report:

Hundreds of religious students clashed with police and occupied Islamabad’s Red Mosque during its reopening Friday, demanding the return of a pro-Taliban cleric two weeks after an army raid to oust Islamic militants from the complex left more than 100 people dead. Pakistani religious students watch as a colleague paints a wall of the Red Mosque in Islamabad.

A large explosion went off in a market area about a quarter-mile from the mosque, and local media reported several people had died. Police say four people were killed and 30 wounded. On a road outside the mosque, protesters threw stones at an armored personnel carrier and dozens of police in riot gear. After the demonstrators disregarded calls to disperse peacefully, police fired tear gas, scattering the crowd. Earlier, security forces stood by as protesters clambered onto the roof of the mosque and daubed red paint on the walls after forcing a government-appointed cleric assigned to lead prayers to retreat.

The protesters demanded the return of the mosque’s pro-Taliban former chief cleric, Abdul Aziz — who is being detained by the government — and shouted slogans against President Gen. Pervez Musharraf. Later, a cleric from a seminary associated with the mosque led the prayers. “Musharraf is a dog! He is worse than a dog! He should resign!” students shouted. Some lingered over the ruins of a neighboring girls’ seminary that was demolished by authorities this week. Militants had used the seminary to resist government forces involved in the siege.

Friday’s reopening was meant to help cool anger over the siege, which triggered a flare-up in militant attacks on security forces across Pakistan. Public skepticism still runs high over the government’s accounting of how many people died in the siege, with many still claiming a large number of children and religious students were among the dead. The government says the overwhelming majority were militants. The mosque’s clerics had used thousands of its students in an aggressive campaign to impose Taliban-style Islamic law in the capital. The campaign, which included kidnapping alleged Chinese prostitutes and threatening suicide attacks to defend the fortified mosque, raised concern about the spread of Islamic extremism in Pakistan.

Militants holed up in the mosque compound for a week before government troops launched their assault on July 10, leaving it pocked with bullet holes and damaged by explosions. At least 102 people were killed in the violence. In an act of defiance to authorities’ repainting of the mosque this week in pale yellow, protesters wrote “Lal Masjid” or “Red Mosque” in large Urdu script on the dome of the mosque. They also hoisted a black flag with two crossed swords — meant to symbolize jihad, or holy war.

The crowd shouted support for the mosque’s former deputy cleric, Abdul Rashid Ghazi, who led the siege until he was shot and killed by security forces after refusing to surrender. Ghazi was the public face of a vigilante, Islamic anti-vice campaign that had challenged the government’s writ in the Pakistani capital. “Ghazi, your blood will lead to a revolution,” the protesters chanted. Police stood by on the street outside the mosque, but did not enter the courtyard where the demonstration was taking place.

Islamabad commissioner Khalid Pervez said police forces did not want to go inside the mosque in case it led to a clash with protesters, but maintained the situation was under control. He said the reaction of Aziz’s supporters was understandable and predicted things would calm down. Over mosque loudspeakers, protesters vowed to “take revenge for the blood of martyrs.” In a speech at the mosque’s main entrance, Liaqat Baloch, deputy leader of a coalition of hard-line religious parties, the Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal, condemned Musharraf as a “killer” and declared there would be an Islamic revolution in Pakistan.

“Maulana Abdul Aziz is still the prayer leader of the mosque. The blood of martyrs will bear fruit. This struggle will reach its destination of an Islamic revolution. Musharraf is a killer of the constitution. He’s a killer of male and female students. The entire world will see him hang,” Baloch said. Pakistan’s Geo television showed scenes of pandemonium inside the mosque, with dozens of young men in traditional Islamic clothing and prayers caps shouting angrily and punching the air with their hands. Officials were pushed and shoved by men in the crowd. One man picked up shoes left outside the mosque door and hurled them at news crews recording the scene.

Maulana Ashfaq Ahmed, a senior cleric from another mosque in the city who was assigned by the government to lead the prayers, was quickly escorted from the complex, as protesters waved angry gestures at him. Wahajat Aziz, a government worker who was among the protesters, said officials were too hasty in reopening the mosque. “They brought an imam that people had opposed in the past,” he said. “This created tension in the environment. People’s emotions have not cooled down yet.” Security was tightened in Islamabad ahead of the mosque’s reopening, with extra police taking up posts around the city and airport-style metal detectors put in place at the mosque entrance used to screen worshipers for weapons.

Pictures from BBC.

89 responses to “The Battle for Lal Masjid Constinues: Another Blast in Islamabad, 12 Killed”

  1. @LeftyProf: Since when were secularists/liberals have done anything worth mentioned? The recent history shows that left[seculars/liberals] have always been used by right party to fulfill their own interest. The creation of Israel was not done by seculars . The war against Communism was fought by two parties(Right wing of US and Pakistan) to defeat Communism. Seculars would be just busy in different pubs of US. Similarly recent war between Hezbollah and Israel was also between two different rights. The battle between Lebonan and Israel in 80s was also not faught by seculars. They were doing same which are doing today that’s kissing toes of US and when planes started dropping bomb over them then all of them were hiding behind “Islamists”[again right wing] because a bomb doesn’t differentiate between right and left. What happened with Reza Pehalvi in Iraan is funny enough that I better don’t mention here.

    The recent war on terror is again a religious war between right wing of US , Israel and Muslim world and again secularists and liberals are being used as Puppet by right wing of US. The RAND just exposes the fact. Since they are being used by Washington so they don’t feel pain or maybe they are not even aware that they are being used?;). So don’t expect anything worthy enough from such community which can just whine on different forums and chant slogans against their enemies. Infact they are very funny characters. They are not more than foam on the surface. When I see more and more opposition by them against religion on this and other forums then it just bring smile on my face that how naive these people are!

    Right now you should be more worried about Turkey, they vatican of seculars/liberals in danger since seculars got defeated there despite of all undemocratic tactics of a community which believes equality about all religion *grin*.

  2. Harris Siddiqui says:

    Suicide attacks are not just some made up story. A few Kg of explosive and ball bearings would do considerable damage to the property. Just because you think that they are not suicide bombs doesn’t mean that suicide bombings don’t exist.

    Even if you take the carrier(suicide bomber) out of the picture, the bombing itself will be just as ugly a crime.

    As far as DNA is concerned, you can only identify the suicide bomber if you have something to compare the sample to, like DNA from siblings, parents or the person himself. All other methods of such identification (finger prints, identification marks etc.) are rarely found from such a crime scene and even if you did find finger prints, who is to say that the perpetrator had a national I.D card with his finger prints available in the system? What if he was an Afghan or Uzbek or Arab?

    Don’t fall for the conspiracy theory that there are no suicide bombings. They are here and being in denial would not solve the sitiuation.

  3. D_a_n says:

    @ Adnan Siddiqui…

    since when did sufiism start to ‘offend’ Islam?
    Im sure you and everybody else (yes, including charlie’s aunt) knows this that the those great gentle and Godly Sufi’s are the very reason most of us good folk in the subcontinent are in fact Musalmaan…I ask you!

    but since facts and true historical context have never really been your specialty I’ll let this one slide…

    and you say the attack was targetted at the Punjab Police…from what I saw on TV ..I saw plenty a civilian with limbs torn off and bleeding ..a few dead…so I was wondering..how do you Mullah’s classify such collateral damage? File in the ‘OOoops’ category?

    the level of your distance from reality and adherence to nonesensical dogma is such that Im surprised Fox News hasnt picked you up yet….but who knows eh! :)

  4. Harris Siddiqui says:

    International laws are broken many times where they conflict with national security and interest. Only countries that can do that are the ones with enough military and political weight to get away with it. U.S has a law that makes it obligatory for the administration to hold the national interest and security of their people above any international law.

    International laws can be exploited by governments that are hell bent on challenging the peace of a region and in such cases these laws only act as hindrance. Prime examples are the operation of Israeli forces to free the captives when Idi Amin was trying to force the Israeli hand in bowing to the hijackers’ demands and U.S operation in Panama to arrest Noreiga. In both cases international laws were broken but the world at large supported the actions.

    I wish Pakistan became a state where national interest is held higher than anything else. Pakistan First and Foremost!!!!

  5. @rain: Report is fake? Now that;s something funny. LOL

    Since it’s exposing truth about secularist and liberals in Pakistan so it’s fake? wow, go and make a search about RAND on Google!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*