Adil Najam
I, too, am a Mumbaikar today.
I wish I could reach out and for just one moment hold the hands of the woman in this AP photograph. Maybe shed some tears on her shoulder. But I do not know what I would say to her. I do not think she would want me to say much. The expression on her face matches the feeling I have at the pit of my stomach and in the depth of my heart. I think – I hope – that she would understand how I feel. I can only imagine what she is going through.
And so, in prayer and in solidarity, I stand today with Mumbaikars everywhere. In shock at what has happened. In fear of what might happen yet. In anger at those who would be so calculated in their inhuman massacre. In sympathy with those whose pain so hurts my own heart but whose tears I cannot touch, whose wounds I cannot heal, and whose grief I cannot relieve.
The solidarity I feel with Mumbaikars is deep and personal.
The first time I ever visited the Taj Mahal Hotel was with my wife. We had been married just weeks and were not staying at the Taj but went to the historic “Sea Lounge” at the hotel for tea and snacks during a short visit to Mumbai. We went to the Oberoi Hotel the same visit in the naive and mistaken belief that we would find Bollywood bigwigs hanging out there. In later years I would come back and stay at the old wing of the Taj – down the corridor from where Ruttie Bai Jinnah and stayed – I would even present in the grand ballroom whose pillars, supposedly, had been brought from her father’s estate. Each time I passed through Victoria Terminus I stood in awe of the pace as well as its presence. In awe of the architectural structure, but also of the sea of humanity around me. I cannot hear of terrorists attacking these places without my own muscles twitching in anger.
But my feeling of solidarity with Mumbaikars is much much more personal than these few fleeting visits over many years. Deeply etched into me are the horrific echoes of 9/11 in New York and the string of terrorist attacks on Islamabad, Karachi, Lahore, Quetta, Peshawar and all over Pakistan whose reports have become all too familiar – but never bearable – on this blog. I know what living with terror feels like. I have thought too much and too deeply about what it feels like to be the target of violence propelled by hatred. I know the pain of helplessness one feels as one stands stunned in grief, wanting so desperately to do something – anything – but not knowing what to do. This is why I identify with the expression on the face of the woman in this picture. This is why, like so many others in the world, today I too am a Mumbaikar.
This is why I stand with Mumbaikars everywhere, in prayer and in solidarity. At a loss for words but with an urge to speak out. My words of condemnation will not change the actions of those who have committed such heinous murder and mayhem. Nor will my words of sympathy diminish the agony of the victims. But speak out I must. In condemnation as well as in sympathy. To speak against the inhumanity of hatred and violence. To speak for the humanity in all of us that we all must hold on to; especially in the testing moments of grave stress.
But, today, I have no words of analysis. What words can make sense of the patently senseless? I do not know who did this. Nor can I imagine any cause that would justify this. But this I know: No matter who did this, no matter why, the terror that has been wrought in Mumbai is vile and inhuman and unjustifiable. And, for the sake of our own humanness, we must speak out against it.
And, so, to any Mumbaikar who might be listening, I say: “I stand with you today. In prayer and in solidarity.”
Well said SHAHID KHAN, the ambivalence (or latent support) towards those who would destroy your land, has lead to the Army being the villains, even when they do try to do the right thing.
Whether any civilian can ever get full control of the ISI is probably the key to Pakistans future … interviews in the New York Times by Carlotta Gall, reported former ISI operatives admitting that parts of the agency were trying to stop attacks by militants, that others in the same organisation were still financing.
You should maybe have a look at this article.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/775658 3.stm
To the indian friends: Somehow I am not seeing any positive view about Pakistan on indian media or foriegn media from the indians. Every body wants the head of Pakistan ( and they think they can realy whip pakistan into order). Why do you think only this side is being projected?
@ Shahid Khan I have been thinking about our SSG commandoes who fought at Lal Masjid all along this episode in india and couldnt help making a comparison ( though I didnt want to bring it up on this particular article). They finished the operation in a matter of hours and they were fighting with hundreds of terrorists and inside their home. Surely the competence and bravery was just at par or better than any special service of the world. No offence to the indian black cats who put their lives in danger for their country, but comparing the performance, the planning , execution and professionalism, the level of the SSGwas totally of a different league. And that made me feel a little more safer Even the very sympethatic foriegn media was amazed at the indian execution of the operation , the way they were firing blindly from the windows in, and it seemed they had no capability of fighting at night ( and they call them elite forces).
“On the contrary i am sure India has never trained militants to go and created terror on pakistani soil.”
The Indian army has openly admitted to training and arming terrorist “counter-militant” groups like the Ikhwan to operate in Kashmir.
Shahid Khan, you hit the nail on the head. The Indian response is cohesive, while we bicker. We are unable to tell friend from foe and unable to discern between amity and enmity.
Harris is simply a realist. And there is a thousand years of hindu-muslim interaction in the subcontinent to support the realist position. Natural adversaries drink from the same pond but they don’t sing together.