Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?

Posted on May 19, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, Society
313 Comments
Total Views: 117112

Adil Najam

This is a painful post to write.

Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.

I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”

But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.

I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.

Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.

But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.

I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.

Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.

But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.

I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.

The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.

313 responses to “Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?”

  1. Harris Siddiqui says:

    Today I visited this site after a long time and was not disappointed to find out that stupidity is still thriving in Pakistan.

    We have already isolated ourselves on the global platform and we are working hard at making sure that we are looked upon as irrational, emotional and destructive nation throughout the world. Way to go!!!

    Let’s see when Israel bans youtube for seemingly millions of videos of the Naik, Israr and other idiots like them who don’t let an opportunity go by without spreading their hate for the Jews and Christians.

    When will India ban that site for the garbage that comes out of Zaid Hamid and Hamid Gul’s mouth and pasted all over the internet?

    When can we learn that the best way to deal with a pack of barking dogs is to ignore them and keep walking. Why do we always end up barking back and encouraging even the quiet ones in the pack to start barking?

    For our esteem minister of religious affairs who thinks that a trade embargo should be the call of the day, I have just one thing to say. A country that can not survive without even importing fertilizer should think twice before uttering that phrase.

  2. libertarian says:

    “Does it ever occur to you that breaking of idols so glorified in Islam may be hurtful to someone else’s feelings?”

    Not only Islam. It’s impermissible in all Abrahamic faiths.

    You’re obfuscating …

    As someone on Facebook notes: “I’m starting a religion where the gods are circle, triangle and square. The new religion forbids depiction of these gods in any form. Any depiction will be met with mindless violence.”

    Ridiculous? This storm in a teacup is not a big step from there.

  3. Ravi says:

    @Adnan:

    “Not only Islam. It’s impermissible in all Abrahamic faiths.”

    So what? Do you mean to say that feelings of Abrahamic faiths should not be hurt, however others are a fair game?

    But wait a minute.

    You yourself answer it later that “my right to swing my arm ends before it connects with your nose”.
    Apparently, in your opinion the dictum should not apply if the nose is non-Abrahamic!

  4. Athar S. says:

    Well Said, Adil – Dead On!!! Can’t agree more.

    And, more commentators agreeing with us should come forward.

    Only the fringe minority can not and will not speak for all of us.

  5. -Farid says:

    Balanced View.

    A protest helps when it has a bearing on those being protested against.

    In this instance, some half-wit across the world does something stupid and we react by blocking some websites on our end.

    We’ve pretty much delivered ourselves in the hands of anyone in the world. Tomorrow if someone wants to shut down Emails in Pakistan, all he has to do is start a chain Email on a topic we don’t like and we’ll close down that as well.

    Certainly we should protest, the government can lodge a protest officially with Facebook. Individuals can protest using the same medium used to spread the vitriol. Newspapers should certainly write about this. But lets not make it so easy for anyone and everyone to control our lives.

    Don’t get me wrong. I’m no fan of Facebook and as such I don’t mind not having it. But lets handle matters in a more measured manner – this achieves nothing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*