Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?

Posted on May 19, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, Society
313 Comments
Total Views: 115146

Adil Najam

This is a painful post to write.

Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.

I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”

But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.

I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.

Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.

But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.

I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.

Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.

But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.

I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.

The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.

313 responses to “Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?”

  1. Jonathan says:

    Love the perspective. Sane. Rational. Reasonable.
    Wish all of us everywhere could be like that.

  2. kamran says:

    Sir Adil Najam,
    Did you know your article is making waves everywhere and has gone viral. Just did a quick Google search and found this:
    THE AUSTRALIAN did a full story around your headline: http://bit.ly/bGEuiy
    THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE carried a version of your post, but I think without the best part, which was the ending, http://bit.ly/FBTrib
    FRANCE24 news channel also quotes you: http://bit.ly/9AZgMe
    Well done in spreading the sane message around.

  3. Aftab says:

    A highly persuasive and rational article. Keep on enlightening us.

  4. John says:

    I am a non-Muslim living in the USA.

    I would first like to point out that the Facebook group and movement is called “Everyone Draw Mohammed Day”, not “Everyone Ridicule Mohammed Day.” Although many people will do just that, there is nothing in the original cartoon that encouraged people to be disrespectful. Unfortunately, even respectful drawings would inflame the Muslim world.

    Many people are talking about how Muslims should use protests and peaceful methods to get this stopped and to ensure that such things are prevented in the future. My question is, if Muslims want everyone else in the world to abide by Islamic rules so as not to offend them, are Muslims prepared to extend the same courtesy to the rest of the world? What if I find the name Muhammed to be deeply offensive? Are Muslims prepared to erase of all mention of their prophet from the internet so as not to offend me? Somehow, I don’t think so.

    Some people have asked what would happen if people started drawing pictures of the holocaust. Well, racists DO draw such pictures, and they get protested about. It doesn’t become a worldwide issue. The only reason that this HAS become such a big issue is that the people behind it know that Muslims are so easy to anger. That’s the entire point. This entire thing was staged to show the world how easy it is to provoke Muslims. If things like the Danish cartoons and the South Park episodes had only sparked letters of protest or peaceful demonstrations, none of this would be happening now. Instead, the fanatics had to send death threats. In any other case, they would mostly be written off as idle threats. However history has proven that death threats from Muslim fanatics aren’t to be taken lightly.

    You wonder why it’s considered acceptable for people to intentionally offend Muslims? Maybe it’s because Islam has produced more psychos in the last 50 years than all other religions of the world combined. And yes, “psycho” is the correct term for anyone who would strap a bomb to their body and use it to kill as many innocent people as possible. Or who would hi-jack a plane and fly it into a building.

    Even if you ignore the fact that most of the world’s terrorists are Muslims, how is the world supposed to respect a religion that is used to justify things like “honor killings”, or teenage girls being stoned to death in backwards villages for the ‘crime’ of being raped? You can say that such things don’t accurately represent Islam as a whole, but why are such things allowed to happen at all?

    To put this in perspective; If it became known that a Catholic church in a small US town was torturing confessions out of accused heretics and then publicly burning them at the stake, there would a huge public outcry, the people involved would be arrested and the government would take steps to ensure that it didn’t happen again.

    Until Islam as a whole can end the majority of barbaric acts committed in its name, both by terrorists and by extremists who believe they have holy law on their side, the world will continue to see Islam as a threat.

  5. Abbas says:

    Dr. Najam, first let me congratulate you on an excellent article. You have expressed the sentiments of many here.

    Also, let me point out that actually there has been no violence or violent protest.

    As a means of protest refusing to visit the offending page is perfectly good and those who want to do so should do so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*