Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?

Posted on May 19, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Media Matters, Society
313 Comments
Total Views: 115025

Adil Najam

This is a painful post to write.

Ideally I would have preferred not to have had to write this post. But I have over 300 messages in my in-box of people fussing over the so-called “Draw Muhammad Day” page on the social networking site Facebook and now the Lahore High Court’s decision calling for a ban on Facebook has forced the issue. And that is what pains me.

I hope that Facebook administration will remove the page. Not because of any “banning” movement and not because of the Lahore High Court. Just because the page and the idea behind the page is inflammatory and offensive. Regardless of what your belief or religion might be, to throw out offensive and hateful vitriolic for the simple and primary purpose of hurting someone else’s feelings – when you know that (a) those feelings will be hurt and (b) when hurting those feelings is really the only purpose of doing what you are doing – is inhuman, cruel, and clearly offensive. If Facebook does not recognize that, then it knows nothing either about “social” or about “networking” and certainly not about “community.”

But at one level, that matters little now. Whether Facebook removes the offensive page or not. The page and its creators have already fulfilled their purpose, met their goals. And it is we ourselves who have helped them do so. And that is what pains me.

I have not visited the offensive page in question and do not intend to. I had also not intended to help publicizing that offensive page, but by having to write this post that is exactly what I am doing. And that pains me. I am offended by the idea that page purports and the goals it seeks to achieve. So, why should I dignify it by a visit? Why should I publicize it? Why should I give it the attention it was created to seek. Yet, all of us (now me included, which is why writing this is uncomfortable) are doing exactly that.And that is what pains me.

Many of the emails I have received give me the link to that page and invite me to visit it so that ‘I can see for myself how offensive it is.’ I do not need to do that. Yet, that is exactly what we have been doing. We have been acting exactly as the creators of that page intended us to. Acting as the promoters and publicists of that page. And now having turned it into an international legal matter giving the attention seekers behind the page the exact thing they wanted: Attention.

But we have done more than that. With the Lahore High Court decision we have allowed the PTA and authorities another precedent and excuse to aggressively “manage” the internet; something that can and will be misused in the future.

I have not been receiving emails from the proponents of that page. The only ones who seem to be noticing us is us Muslims (and for some reason Pakistani Muslims more than any other). If we too had ignored the offensive page – as it deserves to be ignored – it would have gone the exact same way to oblivion as thousands of other sophomoric attempts at cheap attention seeking on the Internet. Instead we have now turned it into an international incident and given it far more limelight than it ever deserved.

Let’s think about it, what did the creators of the offensive page want to do when they set it up? First, they sought attention, and hits, and notoriety in a world where attention is too easily confused with fame. Second, they wanted to ridicule Muslims by the reaction they excepted from this. If you think of it, irrespective of whether Facebook removes the site or keeps it, the organizers of the page have achieved their goal. Well beyond what they expected. Now every other Islamophobic nutcase will get new ideas about how to have his little 10 minutes of fame spewing bigotry and hatred against Muslims.

But more importantly, they simply could not have done this without us. The only people who have turned this from nothingness into a huge issue is us. I am sure that those who set up the page are jumping up and down and thanking us for making their page such a huge success! And that is what pains me.

I am also pained by the sacrilege of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) that this entire drama signifies. As pained as anyone else, and as pained as I would have been at the sacrilege of any other Prophet or religion. But unlike for many others, that pain is neither reduced nor resolved by protesting against Facebook. For me, the antidote to that pain is in the teaching of the Prophet (PBUH) themselves. What would the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) have done in such a situation.

The one thing I am absolutely positive of, is that the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) would not have done what we are doing now: making an international public spectacle of ourselves. Most likely he would have just walked away and ignored (the ‘look the other way when someone throws garbage at you’ model), he might have negotiated with Facebook on the basis of their own stated rules (the Hudabia model), he might have reasoned with detractors (the discourse and discussion model). Nearly certainly Muhammad (PBUH) would have handled it with grace, with composure, and maybe even with a touch of good humor. Most importantly, the Prophet (PBUH) would have kept focusing on his own actions and proving his point with his own deeds rather than with slogans, banners and naara-baazi.

313 responses to “Facebook Fiasco: What Would Muhammad (PBUH) Do?”

  1. Ravi says:

    I personally believe that the esisting world religions won’t survive another 100 years, but the concept of god might survive in some form. As of today Americans have achieved the power of god – They created artificial life from the scratch and Americans are entering the age of Synthetic Biology. They are the ultimate creators on Earth, you go around your house and give me a list of 10 inventions that was not invented in the USA. I doubt you could find any. They could take any life if they really wanted and now they are in a position to give life. Americans should be biologically classified as Homo Sapien Americansis a higly evolved human subspecies!

  2. Moeen says:

    The most stupid comment I found here was by Mr Chand Khan; he says to Adil: “Mr AdilInstead of expecting or speculating about the Prophet PBUH who is no more in this world. I would ask you two simple questionsWhat if somebody posts on internet the real photos of your sister or mother having sex with their boy friends. I hope you would never mind it having high moral grounds in your heart for that wrong doer.What if some one calls names(abuses) your mother grand mother father or sister in front of people on your face, I guess you ll surely turn your back at him and forgive him.I am sure about that Mr moral…”
    Just imagine my friends, how a person can become out of his/her mind by a religion; this guy is comapring someone’s siter, mother and grandmother that U have lived with, touched, eaten with a freaking preacher that was born 1500 years ago that you have never met, talked to or seen? just imagine friends; how religion can make U nuts and banannas:)

  3. Adnan Siddiqi says:


    Well my question is, if God loves his beloved prophet so much, then why doesnt God take care of people insulting his dear prophet?

    @Asim: Read last ayah of Surah Kausar. Allah has already decided the faith.


    For he who makes you angry (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)), – he will be cut off (from every good thing in this world and in the Hereafter)(108:3)

    @Jeff: I am rather thankful you guys are revealing the darker(and actual) side of Western Civilization which our liberals worship more than a God. Thanks for such sick attempts against Islam. As long as there are people like Bush,Molly Moris ,Lars Vilks and others, I as a Muslim less worried to promote Islam in West because you people are working up entirely opposite of human nature. More you spread anti-Islamic content, more people are curious to know more Islam about Islam. No doubt Allah has own ways to spread his religion.He can use anyone to let others know about Islam.

    Even I had joined that blasphemous page and I entered with following lines:


    Salam(peace) to All mankind. I am a Muslim and proud to be one! I belong to a religion which cares more for mankind than the God itself that’s why Islam cares more for human rights than submitting to rituals. Islam is a religion which provides way to help others. This is why Islam rewards when someone removes the stone from road or any obstacle. Islam rewards when someone gives a smile to his parents early in the morning. Islam rewards when someone give away his meal to the needy.

    I agree that there are lots of confusions about Islam;due to some lame activities by crackpots and then propaganda by media. I believe most of you re good at heart and due to lack of knowledge you consider Islam is a threat.

    Guess what? surprisingly many contacted me personally and welcomed me on board too. Some of them asked me where can they know more about Islam and Muhammad because before the incident they were not fully aware about Muhammad(saw);eh how can they when they are not even aware about their own religion. See, you guys are promoting more Islam than us Muslims. Thankyou! and continue it

    @Salman: dude BBC is working. Stop getting hyper.

  4. Rashid says:

    First of all, this is really an outstanding analysis and my congratulations to you on it. I totally agree with your views and I think most Pakistanis and Muslims do.

    But let me say that we should also be proud that Pakistanis, even those who disagree with this view, have found ways to protest peacefully and without any violence. If this passes without any violence then the haters who made the page would really have lost because then they are really proved wrong.

  5. Tammy says:

    Seems like the proponents of the web page are as worked up as its opponents. Maybe the creators of the page should also lighten up. Don’t fool yourself into thinking you are saving civilization by doing this. You are as idiotic and as extremist and as fundamentalist as those who are protesting in the streets againts you. Actually, the two groups are exactly the same in attitude, just on different sides.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*