Today marks Dr. Abdus Salam’s death anniversary. (See new biography of Dr. Salam here).
It should be a moment of deep reflection for all of us. He would have been as great a man as he was even if he did not won the Nobel Award in physics. But we would have conveniently forgotten him. That he did win the Nobel Award is a source of cosmetic and hollow pride for many Pakistanis. Cosmetic and hollow because it is also a source of visible unease. Even when we acknowledge that he was a great scientist (after all, the Nobel Committee thought so), we are uncomfortable acknowledging that he was a great man whose significance goes beyond his science.
As a brutally honest editorial in today’s Daily Times points out, “we are scared of honoring Dr. Salam.” We must not be.
The Daily Times editorial says all that needs to be said; it is worth reading, worth thinking about, and worth quoting in full:
The tragedy of our treatment of Dr Abdus Salam
Dr Abdus Salam (1926-1996) died ten years ago. He was the first Pakistani to get a Nobel Prize in 1979. But he might be the last if we continue to allow our state to evolve in a way that frightens the rest of the world. Our collective psyche runs more to accepted ‘wisdom’ than to scientific inquiry; and even if we were to display an uncharacteristic outcropping of individual genius the world may be so frightened of it that it might not give us our deserts.
We are scared of honouring Dr Salam because of our constitution which we have amended to declare his community as ‘non-Muslim’. When Dr Salam died in 1996 he had to be buried in Pakistan because he refused to give up his Pakistani nationality and acquire another that respected him more. But the Pakistani state was afraid of touching his dead body. He was therefore buried in Rabwa, the home town of his Ahmedi community whose name is also unacceptable to us and has been changed to Chenab Nagar by a state proclamation. But that was not the end of the story. After he was buried, the pious, law-abiding and constitution-loving people of Jhang, which is nearby, went over to Chenab Nagar to see if all had been done according to the constitutional provisions regarding the Ahmedi community to which he belonged.
And what did the constitution say? It said that the Ahmedis are not Muslims, that they may not call themselves Muslims, nor say the kalima or use any of the symbols of Islam. The original amendments to the constitution were passed by Z A Bhutto, a ‘liberal socialist-democrat’, and subsequent tightening of the law was done by the great patriot General Zia-ul Haq. Thus both the civilians and the khakis had connived in the great betrayal of Dr Salam.
After the great scientist was buried in Chenab Nagar, his tombstone said “Abdus Salam the First Muslim Nobel Laureate”. Needless to say, the police arrived with a magistrate and rubbed off the ‘Muslim’ part of the katba. Now the tombstone says: Abdus Salam the First Nobel Laureate. The magistrate remained unfazed by what he had done but Dr Salam’s grave is actually the tombstone of a Muslim culture that Pakistan had inherited from the founder of the nation, Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah. But ironies fly thick in Pakistan. In Jhang, for example, where Dr Salam grew up as a precocious child, the schools that he endowed with scholarships and grants now teach communal hatred rather than the love that he had in mind when he gave them his money.
Meanwhile, the Ahmedi community is under daily pressure and anyone with a twisted mind is free to persecute them.
Abdus Salam was born in Jhang in 1926. At the age of 14, he got the highest marks ever recorded for the Matriculation Examination in Punjab. The whole town turned out to welcome him. He won a scholarship to Government College, Lahore, and took his MA in 1946. In the same year he was awarded a scholarship to St. John’s College, Cambridge, where he took a BA (honours) with a double First in mathematics and physics in 1949. In 1950 he received the Smith’s Prize from Cambridge University for the most outstanding pre-doctoral contribution to physics. He also obtained a PhD in theoretical physics at Cambridge; his thesis, published in 1951, contained fundamental work in quantum electrodynamics which had already gained him an international reputation.
In 1954 Dr Salam left his native country for a lectureship at Cambridge University. Before the Pakistani politicians apostatised him, he was a member of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, a member of the Scientific Commission of Pakistan and Chief Scientific Adviser to the President from 1961 to 1974. Pakistan’s space research agency Suparco was created by him and it is only symbolic that a group of Shia workers of Suparco were put to death in Karachi in 2004 by sectarian terrorists. Like Dr Salam, a lot of gifted Shia doctors have had to leave Pakistan because of the state’s twisted policies.
Dr Abdus Salam got his Nobel Prize for Physics in 1979. It was a most embarrassing moment for General Zia who had “supplemented” the Second Amendment to the constitution with further comic disabilities against the Ahmedis. He had to welcome the great scientist and had to be seen with him on TV. Since the clerical part of his government was already bristling, he took care to clip those sections of Dr Salam’s speech where he had said the kalima or otherwise used an Islamic expression. It was Dr Salam’s good luck that one of the believers did not go to court under Zia’s own laws to get the country’s only Nobel laureate sent to prison for six months of rigorous imprisonment. Dr Salam then went to India where he was received with great fanfare. He had gone there to simply meet his primary school mathematics teacher who was still alive. When the two met, Dr Salam took off his Nobel medal and put it around the neck of his teacher.
Let us admit in a whisper that Pakistan did issue a stamp commemorating Dr Salam years ago lest the government come under pressure to remove it from circulation. It is also true that his alma mater, Government College Lahore, now a university, has named certain ancillary departments and academic sessions after him following a long period of obscurantist domination. But Pakistan needs to feel guilty about what it has done to the greatest scientist it ever produced in comparison to the lionisation of Dr AQ Khan who has brought ignominy and the label of “rogue state” to Pakistan by selling the country’s nuclear technology for personal gain. Can we redeem ourselves by doing something in Dr Salam’s memory on this 10th anniversary of his passing that would please his soul and cleanse ours?
Repost: This post was originally published at ATP on November 22, 2006, on Dr. Salam’s 10th death anniversary.





























































[quote post=”431″]as you believe books to be true I will expect you to stick to this position in all your arguments.[/quote]
By books I don’t mean I agree with what Akbar S AHmad said or what Ali raza or Rizwan Ahmad saw. His speeches are written in history books in plain words and there is no need of interpitition of someone else to understand his mindset.
[quote post=”431″]You can publish your theories at your webspace since you called Dr. Abdus Salam Non Muslim you better support your allegations with proof[/quote]
I already have a url, contact me off the site so I gave you URL. Even if you had capability to comprehend the TITLE of the link you mentioned before then you shouldn’t have come to me.
[quote post=”431″]Hmm where does this come from if you are talking to some sane minds then maybe you’re able to refrain from calling Ahmedis Non Muslims.[/quote]
I have infinite time more cooler and sane mind than you who give excuses for everything. As I said earlier that i am least intrested to know what some other belives and I am even least bothered if some jew declares himself a Muslim. Everything is available to figureout. If someone keeps declaring myself a ‘civil engineer’ while he doesn’t even know about it then everyone would consider him insane rather a normal person but it all depends that whether a person has ability to figure out between wrong and right.
Similary the lame reason that anyone who professes Islam knowledge is a ‘Muslim’ is baseless. A Jewish Rabbi might have more knowlege about Koran,hadith and other thing but He can’t be declared a Muslim anyway. Only a *retard* would call him a muslim..
[quote post=”431″]how all of them were against the creation of Pakistan and still those Besharam migrated her[/quote]
I often hear this argument by liberal extreemist and it forces me to think that whether leftists wanted to get a seprate state so that they can preach their pathetic liberalism and secularism by polluting Islam? As I said, there is no different between extreemists of both cabals. Both wanted to use this state for their own filthy activities. In Zia era right wing extreemists polluted the things and religon and now left wing extreemists are active to pollute things and relgion in Musharraf era. In past those right extreemists call themselves ‘moderate’ like lefts wing extreemists call themselves moderate. Funny bit I must say.
[quote post=”431″]Good thing their Islamic knowledge is exposed in this Hudood controversy may people able to see[/quote]
Yes people unlike left extreemists are able to read Quran and Sunnah and offcourse have access to the source of law itself to understand how much *protection* it provides. Whoever who came up to favor new law and reject failed to give any solid argument. Umera tried to convince but bad luck for her that her own given sources was used to refute her.
[quote post=”431″]of course Sunni (which I am) sect.[/quote]
I remember on other site[KMB] you said tht you don’t believe in “hadiths” and call them fabricated which is against “Sunni” belief who believes in both Quran and Sunnah- “Sunni” is derived from Sunnah and I thnk you were not aware of this. ;) but as I said, one declares himself a sunni or shia, he or she can fool to humans but not to Allah.That’s it!
[quote post=”431″]Please delete my last comment.[/quote]
Yarou mujhe Maaf rakho, Mey Nashay Mey houn
;)
Adnan,
[quote post=”431″]I am not dodging you and I have an answer ready on my hard disk but things were gone enough off the track and was not willing to make it further off the topic therefore I asked adil bhai to take my submitted “Replyâ€
I want to thank the owners of this site to have at least raised their voice and given credit to this great man. That is the place to start. In some ways I do not even mind the disucssion. Let us disucss these things and come to our own conclusions. Discussion is better than silence.
[quote comment=”13129″]What jinnah believed is clearly written in books and left wing extreemists laballed him as a ‘secularist state supporter’.
:D[/quote]
First, as you believe books to be true I will expect you to stick to this position in all your arguments.
A look at the first cabinet that he picked can help one in this argument – his vision was very clear and we can see that in action as well.
“[what I believe] Jinnah believed is clearly [for me] written in books [ i have or I like or I declare to be true or I hand picked to support my vision]”
One major quality of Manto’s work is that he simply tells the story and lets his reader interpret it – looks like he believed that every one is as intelligent as himself and equally capable
What jinnah believed is clearly written in books and left wing extreemists laballed him as a ‘secularist state supporter’. Noone else need to give his own interpetition as there is nothing written between lines. A shair is coming in my mind after enjoying your reaction.
dekh to, dil ke jaan se uthta hai
ye dhuan sa kahan se uthta hai
[quote post=”431″]Anyone who professes to be a Muslim is a Muslim. End of story[/quote]
Again,
Suchai Chupti nahi Banwat k Asooloun sey
Khushboo Atee nahi Khaghaz k phooloun sey
But since God didn’t give ability to everyone to comprehend every thing, as it was said:
[quote post=”431″]But then that would require a brain to decipher.[/quote]
:D