Custom Search

Picture of the Day: Forfeited or Not!

Posted on August 20, 2006
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Photo of the Day, Sports
70 Comments
Total Views: 8442

Share

Adil Najam

The news is too fresh, murky on the details, and still developing, but as Adnan Ahmed has just pointed out on the comments section of another post, Pakistan walked out of — and therefore possibly forfeited — the 4th Cricket Test against England at the Oval, in a dramatic turn of events. Then, it was announced that Pakistan will take the field… but just as the crowd begins to cheer, the umpires decide they will not come out if the Pakistan team does. Meanwhile the light keeps deteriorating. No matter how this ends, this will be a drama to remember.

More and developing details are available here. Best place to stay informed on this is CrickInfo.Com, from where the photograph above is are linked. (Updated after original posting).

Related Posts with Thumbnails

70 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1]

  1. Eidee Man says:
    August 20th, 2006 2:08 pm

    Pakistan are well within their rights to protest in this manner. Darrel Hair has been associated with controversy with not only Pakistan, but Sri Lanka and India as well…seems a pretty racial bias to me.

    However, the crux of the situation goes back to the actual allegation. There were a total of 26 cameras hovering around and capturing every breath of what was going on. Sky Sports even showed clips of Darrel Hair looking closely and following Mohammed Asif as he was shining the ball. The commentators brought up the point that Asif only looked to be polishing and that he was doing it out in the open in front of the umpire and making no effort to hide what he was doing.

  2. Naveed says:
    August 20th, 2006 1:30 pm

    I am extremely impressed by Inzamam. The latest update is (local pakistan time is 10:30pm) that ICC, ECB & PCB officials are meeting IMMEDIATELY meaning this must be taking place now to decide the outcome of the incident. The commentators are generally supportive of Pakistan which is difficult for me to believe since Botham is mildly supportive of Pakistan team because he is relying on video fottage that no enquiry was made by the umpires between 2:14pm when last wicket fell (3rd wicket) and 2:30 when the umpires changed the ball

  3. August 20th, 2006 1:11 pm

    OK folks, hopefully my last update on this for now. So, the news is that no more play today. Unclear if it will resume tomorrow. Meanwhile, I thought the statement from the English Cricket Board was also sensible (again, from CrickInfo):

    Just a little extra from the bemused ECB spokesperson. “It’s certainly nothing to do with the spirit between the teams. That much I can tell you. Just like the rest of us, they sat there in astonishment waiting for someone to tell us what’s happening.”

  4. Adnan Ahmad says:
    August 20th, 2006 1:10 pm

    This is from bbc. Sweet. No one could have handled it better.

    1742: “We feel that there is no evidence whatsoever of deliberate scuffing of the ball. Once you accuse a team of deliberately tampering with the ball, it becomes a very big deal” Shaharyar Khan, PCB chairman

    1741: More from Khan - “We felt we should make a protest, but we simply said that we would stay inside for a few minutes, and go out when the protest had been registered.”

    1739: Quote from PCB chairman Shaharyar Khan: “We are still hopeful that the match can start again.”

  5. August 20th, 2006 12:57 pm

    Re. Adnan’s message. Shahrayar Khan is former diplomat (actually an alumni of where I teach), and head of the Pakistan Cricket Board. Here is what CrickInfo reported:

    “We are hurt and we are disappointed,” says Shahrayar Khan, “and we are registering our complaints through the relevant channels.”

    He also added this, on Sky: “We have indicated very clearly that we can go out and play, in fact the boys came out and that we want the Test match to continue. We want this issue to be finished and resolved. We want the umpires to come out. We have indicated we are ready to come on to the field and play.”

    About the incident earlier he had this to say: “Nobody was consulted and nobody was told that something was wrong with the ball and they felt deeply aggrieved for the country and for the fans. They said that we want to register a protest and they felt that they could do it by just waiting a few minutes. And then we were ready to come out and we felt it was extraordinary that we were ready to come out and the umpires say they are not. It’s very sad that this has come to pass.”

    He added further: “I hope the match can continue. It’s bad light but even if we can continue for half an hour, that would be good.”

  6. Adnan Ahmad says:
    August 20th, 2006 12:54 pm

    I think Shahrayar’s diplomatic background is helping a lot in this situation, which is changing by the minute. I liked his statements given to both cricinfo and bbc.

  7. August 20th, 2006 12:49 pm

    Its time to take Darrell Hair (a racist cheater) to task, we Pakistanis need to protest as loud as possible to call for the expulsion of Darrell Hair

  8. August 20th, 2006 12:45 pm

    With less than 20 minutes left to the game, it is now unlikely that play will happen today, on the 4th day, or at any point tomorrow (last day). Both the Pakistan team and the umpires are off the field. Here is a latest comment from CrickInfo.com a few minutes ago:

    “Meanwhile, Mike Atherton’s opinions on Sky are scathing of Darrell Hair, saying his decision lacks any historical context and that they lacked common sense. “It’s bound to inflame things. It would have been best to leave it to the end of the day. He’s not a man to back down. He’s a stubborn character, a strong character.. so even though Pakistan said they were willing to come back out [after the bails removal/apparent forfeiture] you could imagine him sitting in the dressing room refusing to come out.”

Comment Pages: « 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1]


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!