Custom Search

Deal in Swat: Good Move or Bad Move?

Posted on February 16, 2009
Filed Under >Jauhar Ismail, Politics, Religion, Society
73 Comments
Total Views: 30858

Share

Jauhar Ismail

According to a recent Yahoo news update:

The government (of Pakistan) agreed to impose Islamic law and suspend a military offensive across much of northwest Pakistan on Monday in concessions aimed at pacifying the Taliban insurgency spreading from the border region to the country’s interior.

In my opinion, the devil is really in the details and the implementation of this agreement. I have mixed feeling on this: It is hard to see how the situation in Swat can be controlled only through the military means; there has to be a political dimension. This is what the U.S. is also learning the hard way in Afghanistan where there is already a talk of having some sort of adjustment with “moderate Afghan Taliban”.



In an ideal world, you would have hoped that Pakistan army would have gained the upper hand in Swat and then they could have negotiated from the position of strength. Unfortunately this is not the case. Despite several attempts, the army could not make any significant gains in Swat. Part of this is due to bad strategy and partly due the nature of guerrilla-warfare. Pakistan army was never trained to fight a counter-insurgency; fighting against India is what the focus has been so it does’t come as a surprise that it didn’t perform very well.

As far as their strategy goes, it was based primarily on using gunships and (artillery) shelling against suspected militant hide-outs. This approach is not very conducive to counter-insurgency because it leads to a lot of collateral damage. As the U.S. experience in Iraq shows, your mission in such a situation must really be to “secure the population”. This was the fundamental change in strategy that U.S. Gen. David Petraeus made but such a change requires putting a lot of boots on the ground, taking a lot more causalities and better intelligence. Unfortunately the Pak army was unwilling and incapable to take this approach which resulted in the bloody Swat stalemate.

Against this backdrop, the agreement can offer a way out if government can play its cards correctly. It should also be noted that this is not the first time that Swat will be under the so-called Shari’s law. This was the case for decades when Swat/Dir region was part of the princely state and life was governed by “Customary law”. The elected representatives of the Swat region have also been in favor of incorporating some populist militant demands such as Qazi courts and quick and simply justice with a 6 months deadline to process all cases.

One can hope that by incorporating the populist demands and a willingness to understand and work with local sensitivities, the authorities can gain credibility with the local population and take some of the wind out of the insurgency’s sails. I am under no illusion that the likes of Molana Fazlullah will be willing to give up their weapons and stop fighting but hopefully such a agreement will isolate the hard core extremist elements from the deeply conservative local population and deprive them from one of their main arguments. It is a lot easier to deal with insurgents when they don’t enjoy widespread local support.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

73 comments posted

Comment Pages: « 10 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 »

  1. Aatif says:
    February 18th, 2009 1:39 am

    Its better than fighting our own people. And the talibans will also open girls’ schools according to the agreement.

  2. Nazra says:
    February 18th, 2009 1:24 am

    This is a bad deal for everyone. My heart goes out to all those little girls who have no future, whose dreams of going to school have been shattered, who have to lives confined lives without any hope. Zardari has a made a pact with the devil, and we know how such pacts turn out.

    It won’t be long until the scourge of the Taliban spreads into Isloo, Lahore and Karachi and makes demands for imposition of rules, regulations and laws similar to those in Swat. I wish the people of Pakistan would see the threat and rise up. But they are buried under a layer of apathy so heavy that they can’t. Start digging folks. Before it’s too late.

  3. February 18th, 2009 12:18 am

    I just wonder shall we ever be able to visit again the great places like Mallam Jabba and Kalam? Shall there be peace enough? A local called me from Swat yesterday. They seem to be hopeful.

  4. Yasmeen says:
    February 17th, 2009 10:19 pm

    This is a terrible development. It is surrendering to the scare tactics of these extremists and will only make them more bold in Swat as well in rest of country.

  5. Muhammad says:
    February 17th, 2009 8:33 pm

    I agree with Riaz Haq. In addition I believe that this a surrender by the government of Pakistan. This will only make that Taliban stronger and now it will be almost impossible to stop them. As a Pakistani in America I am often called upon to explain the situation in Pakistan amongst my American freinds. I think I’m going to give up! I also had the intention of returning to Pakistan once I complete my masters, however I am not so sure anymore…

  6. Faizan Ghaznavi says:
    February 17th, 2009 8:13 pm

    This was an awful move on the part of Zaradri’s awful government. This will send off a chain reaction within the Taleban, providing positive reinforcement for their un-Islamic efforts. The Taliban’s “Sharia” is not that of Islam. Rather it is a bastardized ideological form of tyranny. Do not approach this issue in any other manner. The Taleban are a ruthless, unIslamic group of ignorant men, period. Sharia law is a beautiful thing, and to implement it in this manner is simply haram.

  7. Faraz says:
    February 17th, 2009 7:40 pm

    Great news for the locals, and the opposite for those who are living in and out of country. I can understand that most of you are faithful to your masters and are afraid to say anything against. Come out of the shell and think like a Pakistani if not as a muslim.

  8. sidhas says:
    February 17th, 2009 7:12 pm

    This is perfect example of capitulating to the demands of criminals. I stick to old dictum that says rebels and rebellions should be crushed.

    Call me conservative but there are certain groups that represents irrationality and talibans are among them.

    On a lighter note, haven’t we tried same tactics during Mush era.

Comment Pages: « 10 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 »


Have Your Say (Bol, magar piyar say)

Please respect the ATP Comment Policy.

Keep comments on topic; no personal attacks; don't submit indecent, inflammatory, slanderous, uncivil or irrelevant comments; flamers and trolls are not welcome; inappropriate comments will be removed or edited.

If you won't say it to someone's face, then don't say it here!

Readers who want to use a URL should please use the TINY URL program.

Thanks, and keep the comments coming!