Multiple Eids: The More the Merrier

Posted on October 24, 2006
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Economy & Development, History, Religion, Society
35 Comments
Total Views: 33644

Adil Najam

After all the trouble we went through to time our Eid posts (here, here, here, here, here, here) so they could be enjoyed by people in different time zones around the world, it turns out that ‘official’ Eid in Pakistan will be on Wednesday. Of course, the ‘unofficial’ Eid’s have already been celebrated on Monday and Tuesday.

Ridiculous, but true.

Some of our readers suggest this is yet another sign of a society divided and forever seeking new ways to become even more divided. Another way to look at it is that we so love having Eid that we want to enjoy it thrice; or that some so like fasting that they want to fast even more. Of course, the idea of a corporate conspiracy about Eid stall vendors paying off the roat-i-hilal-kamaity to rake in a few more nights of Eid customers has not yet surfaced; but I am sure it will.

The funniest and the most thought-provoking posts on this drama comes from the blog ‘Windmills of my Mind’ by Zaheer Kidvai. His blog – amongst the very best written and funniest Pakistani blogs – is a must-read for me and I have been waiting to do a post on Kidvai Sahib himself (he is the force behind the Faiz multimedia project as well as so much more; see here). As much as anything else I love the site for its credo quote – “They laugh at me because I am different; I laugh at them because they are all the same” – if only the rest of us could also appreciate this insight!

That post, like most of the projects I cherish the most, will have to wait. But I did want to share today excerpts from his two recent posts on this multiple Eid business. Note how he spells ‘Eed’ what I write as ‘Eid’ and others spell as ‘Id’; I am sure there are other spellings too, but it matters not because as they say in Lahore ‘gall samjh aani chaiaye‘; after all, if we have multiple celebrations why not have multiple spellings too!

The first post (A Tale of Two Eeds) is historical and worth reading in the full – if only for the wonderful humorous poetry of Syed Mohammed Jafri – but here is an excerpt:

In Pakistan, Eed has almost always been plagued by controversies on the matter of when to celebrate it. But that’s really a pessimistic view. Think of the joys connected with Moonsightings that would put UFO sightings to shame, Official and Unofficial Eeds, Ramzans that overstay their welcomes, enforced Eeds and enforced non-Eeds. I can think back to some examples from the days of that arch-Dictator, Ayub Khan, and cite references to them by misraas/shayrs from my favourite humourous poet of the time, Syed Mohammad Jafri (SMJ).

If memory serves me well, the President ordered Eed to be held all over the country after some of his province-mates claimed that the moon had been sighted, while the mullas of the province that detested him the most ruled that the method of sighting was unIslamic, insisting that the Ruet-e-Halal Committee (SMJ: Ae ruet-haraam committee tujhay salaam) had to get evidence of a ‘natural sighting’ and the method of going up in helicopters to see the moon behind the clouds was unacceptable. Karachiites, for the most part, and many others scattered over the country, therefore fasted the next day (SMJ: Hua rukhsat nah jo maahé ramazaañ eed kay din) – with Ayubi mullas roared statements about the kufr of fasting on Eed.

(As an aside, some laughingly claim that this was the occasion when Maulana Ehteshamul Haque opposed Ayub and was locked up in a thaana, from which he emerged with the Thaanvi bit added to his name.)

Ayub forcibly decided to have the country observe Eed in accordance with the NWFP decision (SMJ: Khaalis pathaan chaand hua arzé paak par) that emanated from the committee’s Peshawar office (SMJ: ‘Peshah var’ mullaaoñ nay ramzaañ ko dhakka day diya). Most mullas in Karachi refused to lead Eed prayers and the major (official) congregation had to have the Imam of the Karachi Jail forced into leading the Namaazé Eed (SMJ: Jail say maulvi bulvaaya pa∂haanay ko namaaz / Nah koee bandah rahaa aur nah koee bandah navaaz).

Worse was to come the next day, when the ‘faithful’ gathered with their imaams to offer prayers only to find that some mosque gates had been padlocked by the government supporters, forcing the crowd to say the prayers on the road. (SMJ: Talvaar kay zareeyay say manvaaya eed ko / Sharmindah kar kay rakh diya roohé Yazeed ko!)

The second post (We live in Amazing Times) relates to the current situation, and is worth thinking about. Again, do read it in full, but here is an extended excerpt:

Work – such as it is during Ramzan – came to a grinding halt just before Noon on Friday the 20th, in Lahore (which I happened to be visiting), as people started getting ready for the Jum’ah Prayers (it was the Al Vida’ Jum’ah … the last Friday of Ramzan). Many of them were trying to reach the Badshaahi Masjid to join the large congregation before traffic got heavy. Then there was a weekend, followed by the ill-timed Monday-Wednesday holiday. Eed was expected to be on Tuesday, but the traditional Eed+2 days have now been replaced by the 3-day vacation starting a day earlier, giving out-of-station people time to reach home before Eed.

Of course, as luck and stupidity would have it, Eed has now fallen on Wednesday for most of us. So Thursday is a holiday, too. On Friday the 27th, as often happens in such circs, many people will phone in sick – a few will actually be suffering from the after-effects of over-eating and having their mealtimes disrupted again after Ramzan. Admittedly, the more decent (and the gutless) will dodder in, slightly late, and spend the better part of the morning holding a hugathon, calling up a few friends and then getting up around noon to prepare for prayers. Back for a couple of hours, after a leisurely post-prayer lunch, and they too are away for the weekend again!

But the decent are in a minority, anyway. For the majority, after their departure on the 20th, their first day in office will be on the 30th and their first day at work will be the 31st . You really can’t expect people back in unfamiliar work surroundings to get in the groove on Day 1, can you? Thank Almighty Allah that we are a rich country and can afford such 11-day breaks

A serious question is How (or even Why) does the owner of a small-to-medium business pay a workforce that’s been on half-speed for 15 days, on holiday for the rest of the month, and has obviously fallen short of its deadlines and has caused financial losses connected with this idiotic behaviour? Why should the burden of an individual’s beliefs fall on anyone but him (or on the State, if it officially subscribes to the philosophy)? Do Muslims in the USA or UK get half-days off? Or do they not fast? Are there any Hadeeses that support this half-day tradition? The principal of Fasting – I imagine – is to try and get through a normal day, with the additional hardship of shunning all temptations. Where are the temptations if you spend your time sleeping all morning at your desk – The Sehri Süstee Syndrome – and all afternoon at home? Reminds me of Mirza sahab:

Saamané khor-o-khaab kahaañ say laaooñ?
Aaraam kay asbaab khaañ say laaooñ?
Rozah mera eemaan hae, Ghalib, laykin …
Khaskhaana-o-barfaab kahaañ say laaoñ?

35 responses to “Multiple Eids: The More the Merrier”

  1. Adnan Siddiqi says:

    The community which suffes most on such festivals is daily wages community. This time we have almost a week off in Pakistan. Think about those who earn money daily and feed their families. What would be Eid for them?

    I know that ppl get more than a week off on the occasion of XMAS, I assume people over their also work on daily wages basis, what is the solutuon to deal with such people by US govt?

  2. Zakintosh says:

    Sridhar Sahab, I totally agree that the incidents quoted by Samdani Sahab are not correct analogies (and, while that may not be his intent, come across as a knee-jerk defence reaction).

    IMHO there is a worldwide fundamentalist revival – one that I view as the last throes of a dying order – and ALL violence in the name of religion is increasing. It is not just India and Pakistan. The killing, in the US, of a doctor by a Religious Right-wing group for his performing abortions is part of the same strain, as are many of the son-of-a-Bush’s prouncements.

    However, Muslims are much much more involved with their religion in day-to-day lives today (across the globe) than any other religious group, so such things are bound to occur more frequently in their societies. Sectarian violence is – except perhaps in Ireland – almost exclusively a Muslim phenomenon and, in Pakistan, a major cause of death. Much worse is the fact that the word Sect is now being ‘refined’ further: Years ago the battles were often between the two major sects, Sunnis and Shias (and mainly confined to the month of Muharram); now they are within the various Sunni groups, too. Deeobandis and Baraylvis, their two main schisms, hurled harsh words against each other once. Now they kill. That this is a spiral that is self-destructive is all I can hope.

    A lot of the blame, for this to have reached such a situation, lies with our tolerance of the intolerant – not an easy paradox to wriggle out of.

  3. Samdani says:

    Thanks Sridhar on the explanation for why that number is what it is.

    Also, before anyone else says so, I know that using the total national GDP is not exactly correct. Not every economic activity comes to a halt. Crops, for example, do not stop growing! But I do think that for certain type of economic activity the slowdown is very costly. As the post mentions, for small businesses for example. I know from personal experience that government offices work slows down to criminally negligent levels.

  4. Sridhar says:

    You have to take 25% of a month’s GDP, not the annual GDP of 347b. Divide 86.8 by 12 and you get a figure close to 7.25.

  5. MQ says:

    [quote comment=”5477″] “… the productivity goes down by 25%. Given Pakistan’s GDP is around $347.5B, that would mean a productivity loss of around $7.25B!”[/quote]

    Samdani,
    25 percent of 347.5 b is 86.8b and not 7.25b. Am I missing something?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*