Adil Najam
The way that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was removed was bad enough. But what has happened since then is even more disturbing.
The Chief Justice removed. Media being muzzled. Lawyers protesting beaten up.
One can debate whether Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammed Chaudhry should have been removed or not, or even whether the way he was removed was appropriate or not. But there is no question that the way the government is dealing with this issue is shameful, distressing, and dangerous.
The shamefulness is obvious in these pictures; just as it was when a young man’s shalwar was taken off as he protested ‘disappearances’ some months ago. It is distressing because it demonstrates the sanctity of our most important institutions – the judiciary and the media – is under stress. It is dangerous because if one keeps slipping down this road then it is not merely the future of this government but that of the entire country that will be at stake.
Whether the lawyers here instigated the violence or not, I do not know. They very possibly did, and that is itself disturbing. But that is not the point. The question is how a society and a state deals with dissent and protest. Once again, the answer is: “Shamefully.”
I do not know who is advising the government on all of this. I just pray that someone is. I hope there is someone who stands up and says:
“Don’t do this.
Please don’t do this.
This is not good for you.
This is not good for the country.
This cannot be good for anyone.
Please – for God’s sake – STOP!”
I wish I had something more profound to say right now. But as I stare at these pictures and this video clip, I hold my head in shame; I am distressed; and I ponder on the dangers before us.
All I can think of right now is: “Allah khair karey!”
(Also see a BBC video report here. All pictures above from BBC website; video from GEO News).ÂÂÂ
According to the following daily times report, traders have also decided to participate in Friday’s protest along with the lawyers and opposition:
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007 3\16\story_16-3-2007_pg1_6
Also, I believe Aaj TV is again off air.
In this situation with the media under pressure, the people not only need to support the CJ, but also the journalists, especially the Jang group and Aaj TV, which have been providing excellent reporting and coverage despite the government’s constant attempts to gag them.
[…] It was Kamran Khan’s Show in which Mr Wasi Zafar’s misbehavior on VOA was reported (video of that program here). He was also the host of Geo’s live transmission which showed and commented on the misbehavior with Chief Justice of Pakistan and his family last Monday. I guess Kamran Khan has finally paid the price of speaking the truth and his efforts to present facts to the people of Pakistan. […]
From Ayaz Amir’s column
[quote]A few other issues have also been settled by this crisis. Confusion no longer surrounds the National Spoon Awards. The first prize goes, indubitably, to Information Minister Mohammad Ali Durrani who has outdone himself. Second prize: honourable law minister, Wasi Zafar, who, in the form of his major contribution to the English language by the meaning with which he has invested the phrase “…the big armâ€
Ayaz Amir writing in the Dawn. One of the many hard-hitting op-ed pieces been written in the aftermath of the judicial crisis. Throughout the entire affair, we must pay tribute to the media who have responded very well to this challenge on the judiciary. My apologies for the long post. The article is a bit emotional, but i feel it is worth reading.
Madness and arrogance unspeakable
By Ayaz Amir
Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad.
— Euripides
NOTHING like this has happened in Pakistan for a long time, certainly not in the last seven and a half years during which the nation has been seized by immobility and paralysis.
Now, all at once, the waters seem to be moving and the heavens opening. All because of the courage and steadfastness of one man and the response his courage has evoked amongst the legal fraternity and Pakistanis at large.
Bereft of worthy icons, much less heroes, the people of Pakistan suddenly have someone they can look up to and take heart from: the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry.
Such has been the sad, tarnished history of the superior judiciary Pakistanis had lost faith in it. Now after a long time, a product of the judiciary has arisen to become a magnet to their hopes and aspirations.
When the Chief Justice and his wife, Begum Iftikhar Chaudhry, walked out of their house on Tuesday morning, refusing to sit in any official car and insisting they would rather walk to the Supreme Court – where the Chief Justice had to appear before the Supreme Judicial Council to answer the reference filed by Gen Musharraf – the Chief Justice was roughed up by the Islamabad police and pushed into a waiting car.
Photos of this shocking incident, with a rough hand holding the Chief Justice’s head, have appeared in some newspapers. Unthinkable as it may be, even Begum Iftikhar was pushed around. A taste no doubt of ‘real’ democracy and ‘enlightened moderation’.
But violating the Chief Justice’s person, what has it achieved? It has further elevated his already high stature in the eyes of the Pakistani people. All the high-ups of the Islamabad police, including the Inspector-General (otherwise a likeable enough person), were present when all this was taking place. They can spend the rest of their lives explaining their sorry part in this affair.
As for Begum Iftikhar, she now becomes in the eyes of the public the First Lady of Pakistan. Eat your hearts out, other candidates for this honour.
Consider the fix the people of Pakistan are in. Those with any heart in them would have wept at the Chief Justice’s manhandling. But, in a strange way, they would also have felt elated.
For their worst fears were that the Chief Justice might succumb to pressure, thus taking the wind out of the sails of the present national mood. After all, under virtual house arrest, with no access to the outside world, deprived of newspapers and television (basic necessities in our day and age, especially for someone in his position), his children prevented from going to school, questions were bound to arise about his state of mind.
But those fears stood dissipated by Tuesday’s events which showed that here was a man not going to bend before unlawful or unholy authority. As worst fears stood confounded, the best hopes being entertained were vindicated.
The Chief Justice would also have derived strength from Tuesday’s happenings. Because when the car carrying him finally arrived before the gates of the Supreme Court, the people assembled there, unable to keep their emotions in check, lost all control and stormed the vehicle and pulled him out. Amidst deafening cheers and much jostling (but this was jostling of another kind) they swept him towards the doors of the Supreme Court.
They would have broken the doors and entered the building itself but it was the Chief Justice who bade them go back. And you know what? Even in that melee the crowd obeyed. This is what moral authority is all about. With it you don’t need bayonets to have your way. Without it, not all the bayonets in the world can come to your rescue.
But, by God, how have the Blackcoats of the legal fraternity acquitted themselves. In all the popular movements with which our history is littered, lawyers were part of the popular ferment, seldom its spearhead. How different this time: Blackcoats in front, first at the barricades, the nation behind, drawing inspiration from their courage and example.
In the recent elections of the Supreme Court Bar Association the legal community seemed to be badly split. But as soon as this crisis erupted differences seemed to be forgotten. Across the country the unity of lawyers has been exemplary and heart-warming.Senator Latif Khoso is a leading member of the bar. In his distinguished career, however, he will have received few marks of honour more shining than the merciless blow on the head from a police lathi at the gates of the Lahore High Court. Borne aloft on the shoulders of his colleagues, his head and face streaming with blood, his has been one of the most striking images of this agitation. Hail the Pakistani media too, newspapers and private TV channels, which have fulfilled their responsibility admirably, not only keeping the nation informed about what’s going on but also educating it about the fundamental issues involved in the present unrest, issues going far beyond, much beyond, the person of the Chief Justice.
The issues are democracy, the rule of law and the doctrine of the separation of powers. What is Pakistan’s destiny? To wallow in the turbid waters of authoritarianism forever or a somewhat different future in which the people can come into their own instead of having to endure an endless cycle of self-appointed military ‘saviours’ usurping what is not theirs and imposing their misguided will on the nation?
My Lord the Chief Justice is thus proving to be a catalyst of a larger discontent. All the issues swept underneath the carpet for the last seven and a half years are coming into the open. Had he not been courageous, had he submitted to uniformed diktat, this moment would never have come. It would have passed, awaiting another catalyst and another crisis. But he stood his ground and the result is before us: bottled up unrest breaking free from its confines.
What did Keats say? “He ne’er is crowned with immortality Who fears to follow where airy voices lead.â€
’سیاسی خواÛ