Imran, Altaf, PIA and Pakistan Politics

Posted on June 15, 2007
Filed Under >Adil Najam, People, Politics
115 Comments
Total Views: 43897

Adil Najam

Flying in from London to Islamabad, I bumped into Imran Khan on the plane. There he was, sitting a couple of rows ahead of me, reading The News, with his own picture on its front page (meeting Nawaz Sharif in London). I had not yet seen the paper, nor followed that days events in London (I was flying in from Amsterdam where I had been in meetings all day). We exchanged a few pleasantries, said nice things about what we had been up to since we had last met in Chicago just about a year ago (I had reported in detail on that here).

I must say, I did not fully grasp everything he said until later after I landed in Islamabad and first saw his supporters and TV cameras lined up at the airport, and then every news channel covering his press conference in London, and its political implications. In our short conversation he pretty much covered the exact same points I saw him presenting on TV,with pretty much the same passion. I guess he had come fresh from the press conference. Since all of that is now in the news already, I will not repeat it. The one thing I did ask him about were rumors about his ‘patch up’ with the MQM leading to the lifting of the ban on his entry into Sindh. Readers would remember those rumors surfacing everywhere, including on ATP, a few days ago. He shrugged those away as nonsense and just rumors.

My own sense from this very brief discussion chat was that:

(a) he does seem very serious abut taking on MQM Chief Altaf Hussain,
(b) that he fully realizes the seriousness of what he is doing, and
(c) he seems to be doing this out of personal conviction much more than political opportunism.

I may turn out to be wrong, but my first impression was that the earnestness with which he spoke about what he was doing and why that cannot be easily faked. This, then, seems not to be a story that will fizzle away easily. Not if Imran can help it.

If this is, in fact, so then Pakistan politics will continue to become even more interesting than it already is. ‘Party’ politics may just come back into limelight, but not ways one had expected. If indeed there are to be elections in Pakistan soon then the impact of this tussle could go well beyond defining what happens to just Imran Khan and the MQM.

By the way, as it turned out it was an interesting PIA fight to be on. Interior Minister Aftab Sherpao boarded soon after me. As did Commerce Minister Humayun Akhtar Khan (returning, I believe from the WTO meeting in Geneva). They both greeted Imran graciously, and briefly, and then then nearly all of us made the best of the overnight flight by going off to sleep. Of course, I first watched the ‘Tribute to a Legend’ show on Pakistani filmstar Muhammad Ali on the PIA channel.

P.S. In case you wonder, no, I did not speak to either of the Ministers. I do not know either of them, and would not have known what to say anyhow, especially if either of them had seen my own most recent musings on the political happenings in Pakistan.

115 responses to “Imran, Altaf, PIA and Pakistan Politics”

  1. KAWA1 says:

    The epic of all poison against Muslim countries always originate from one place. London!

    The false reporting provided to CIA about yellow cake from Niger originated from Italy only to be immediately verified by Great Britain MI Branch.

    May it be intellectual terrorism in the form of Salman Rushdi to hurt Muslims or political terrorism in the form of the self proclaimed Peer “Altaf Hussain, Britain will always support these people to be used as and when required.

    Imran can try and keep doing the only decent thing possible but unfortunately nothing will happen. The British Government is fully aware of Altaf’s deeds to full extent.

  2. Ayjay says:

    If Observer is right and the case against Altaf is “pro bono” then a financial campaign would be helpful to give it a higher priority. Someone should relay this idea to Imran. This would be a genuine Pakistani “War on Terror”.

  3. Sohail says:

    From Nasim Zehra’s artcle in THE NEWS

    http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=612 24

    ” In Pakistan for multiple reasons the gap between mainstream politics and ethics is barely shrinking. Imran Khan, the maverick politician who combines ethics, principles and politics functions largely without party machinery. He may influence the urban vote bank as an electoral partner of a party such as the PML-N. On his own for now he is the emerging voice of conscience on Pakistan’s power scene; he is to Pakistan’s mainstream political scene what Asma Jehangir is to Pakistan’s human rights scene. ”

  4. Kruman says:

    Brilliant political satire. I have only 2 words to describe it, simply brialliant.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYlv_oqXTBY

    Viqar,
    I think Hamid Mir was merely stating the American position. This is the impression I got.

    Let me say this, there is no other Pakistani politician who’ll be such an avid supporter of the Bush administration, not even Benazir. And Hamid Mir was trying to say the same.

  5. Viqar Minai says:

    Kruman: Re Hamid Mir’s article – http://in.rediff.com/news/2007/jun/19hamid.htm – in which he suggests that US doesn not want to lose their only ally (Musharraf) because “there is no other ally”. If this is what Hamid Mir believes after all his years of experience in the politics of Pakistan, I really feel sorry for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*