Kalabagh Dam, which has been a dead project for all practical purposes, got a stir yesterday when Federal Minister for Water and Power Raja Pervez Ashraf said that the project has now been shelved for ever.
On the same day, another interesting development happened about NWFP where it was decided to change the name of NWFP (North West Frontier Province) to ‘Pakhtunkhwa‘
1. Kalabagh Dam
For the past few decades, both of these issues have always created passions and exposed the fissures in Pakistani society. The politicians from three smaller provinces have been unanimous in hailing the decision on shelving Kalabagh dam for ever, whereas JI and PTI have been very vocal against the decision. Infact, the opposition from Punjab has been so great that later in the day, Minister had to change his words and he clarified that the project was ‘on hold’ and not totally discarded.
PML(Q)’s role on this issue, however, made me smile. Their whole politics nowadays revolves around saying and doing opposite to what PML(N) and PPP say and do. If PML(N) says ‘X’ on an issue then PML(Q) right away says ‘NOT X’ without going in the merits. So while PML(N) is too busy with the lawyers, PML(Q) got the chance to do politics on the issue and their statements are all pro Kalabagh Dam today. One should ask PML(Q) what did they do about the project in the past 6 years? PPP who has substantial vote base in Sindh and NWFP can take this stand against the dam construcition and has done so.
Many people are also saying that the whole purpose of stirring a dead issue like Kalabagh Dam by the Minister at this point in time is just to cause diversion from other issues like price hike, energy shortage, lawyers etc etc.
During my undergrad studies, I once took a course called ‘Engineering Economics’. I don’t remember much from that course now except for one line from my text book. It went like this:
“Mega Projects of a country should be started immediately after planning is done otherwise they’ll end up becoming political issues”
Over the years this line has proved itself true over and over again. I think this is exactly what has happened to Kalabagh Dam project too. It has now become such a big political issue that nobody can dare to challenge it in 3 smaller provinces. And just like my Engineering Economics book said, as soon as Governement mulled on the decision of building the Kalabagh dam, the opposition against it grew stronger and stronger in Sindh and NWFP.
The idea of Kalabagh Dam was conceived in 1953 and until 1973 it was going to be a water storage place for irrigation purposes only. From 1973 to 1984, the design was changed to make it a multi-purpose mega dam. If completed it will be 260 feet high, will submerge 35000 acres of land, will generate 3600 MW of hydel power, store 6.7 MAF water for flood control and supply 12.8 MAF water to Mianwali, Khushab, D.I. Khan and Jhelum districts for irrigation.
In 70s and 80s my family used to subscribe to Urdu Digest. I very vividly remember that in summer of 1979, Urdu Digest had a special issue on Kalabagh Dam. The issue showed an artist’s imagination on title page and it was touted as the mluti purpose dam with multiple spillways for flood control, agriculture and Power Generation. 29 years have passed since that introductory report of the Kalabagh appeared in Urdu digest. What has happened since then? I believe nothing has happened on gorund as far as actual dam construcution goes. I do remember reading about some heavy machinery was once moved to the spot in one of the previous government (2005) and that is all.
I remember reading late Wali Khan (ANP)’s statement many years ago, that if Kalabagh Dam is built then nothing will be left of NWFP cities of Nowshera to Mardan. The water level of Kalabagh dam will be higher than these two cities and will cause severe water-logging problem in these two cities. So much so that they may turn into lakes. The claim of Wali Khan is however, refuted by the dam planners which point out dam’s altitude at 915 feet is lower than that of Nowshera at 938 feet and Mardan at 958 feet.
The Sindhi politicians are also against the dam becuase they think there will be not much water left in the system for Sindh’s needs. Already the water flow downstream of Kotri barrage is practically zero. The sea water has come inlands into River Indus delta and almost 2 million acres of arable land has been lost to Sea water there causing mass exodus of people to cities.
I’ve also seen photos of Lansdowne Bridge Sukkur from 1950s to present. In 1950s there used to be water under the bridge stretching from bank to bank. That water under the bridge has since flown away. Now all one can see is a big sandy desert under the bridge and then a narrow river slowly inching towards the delta (except for monsoon floods).
Over the years I’ve also traveled extensively in Sindh and wherever I’ve gone, I’ve seen slogans of
‘Kalabagh Dam naa-manzoor’ (Kalabagh Dam not acceptable)
written as wall chalking all the way from Kashmore to Karachi.
“baat se baat nikalti hai” (one thing leads to another) In August 2004, Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain was camaigning for Shaukat Aziz in Tharparkar, Sindh and there he gave this funny statement which has remained stuck in my memory. He said:
“agar aap ko Kalabagh Dam ka naam pasand nahi…naam mein kia rakha hai… meri taraf see aap is ka naam neela-bagh ye peela-bagh rakh deN..” (If you don’t like the name of Black Garden Dam… What is in a name? For what I care, you can rename the project as either Blue-Garden Dam or Yellow-Garden Dam)
So what do you guys think? I think the dam will never be constructed. It is a dead horse. The issue has been raised now to probably create diversion from other issues.
One point that does go in favor of building Kalabagh dam is the forecast that all future wars will be fought to control energy and food sources like fresh water resources, oil and gas reserves etc. If Kalabagh dam is built it may provide a water storage which may be needed soon as both Mangla and Tarbela are silting fast and may not live more than few years.
An informative editorial appeard in Dawn on May 28 on the subject. It is given in the reference section below. I suggest our readers to read it too.
2. Pakhunkhwa
When I first read this story, I told myself, “so what?”. Exactly. so what if NWFP is getting renamed Pakhtunkhwa? One of my favourite real life anecdotes goes like this. There was a Chemistry lecture going on in Karachi University. The teacher drew two molecules on the board and told the class to name them anything because it was not important. To this a guy from back benches shouted:
“Madam. in ka naam pappoo aur guddoo rakh deN”
Point is naam mein kia rakha hai? (What is so important about a name?). My personal read is this. After USSR’s demise ANP has lost its ‘kaaba’ and a source of ideology. They were looking for some issue on which to do politics. They got revived on new issues to do politics for two reasons. First was the renewed Pashtoon nationalism fueled by the on going war on both sides of the durand line, and second issue was created to rename the province as ‘Pakhtunkhwa’. This second issue is so big that ANP won the recent elections in NWFP, in part, on this slogan and in part because JI didn’t take part in the elections. Now that ANP is in power, they need action on this issue so that their constituencies can think that yes some real work is getting done, and hence raising of Pakhtunkhwa issue now.
I personally think there is no harm. If at all, it will strengthen the federation. If in Sindh, Punjab and Baluchistan multiple nationalities and ethnicities can live together without worrying too much about the province’s name then the name Pakhtunkhwa is a non-issue too. It will become an issue only if one wants it to be, and I hope it doesn’t happen. The name Pakhtunkhwa is also a ground reality. If you’ve ever been to Quetta, you’ll notice that 100% of the shops in Pashtoon area write their addresses on their shops ending in ‘junoobi Pashtunkhwa’ as the province’s name instead of Balochistan. So my point is that the name ‘Pashtunkhwa’ is already a ground reality. Lets not unnecessarily push back on it.
End Point:
The above are my opinions. I am however, not tied to them without reasoning. If somebody can educate me otherwise on why building Kalabagh Dam now is a good idea and why renaming NWFP as Pakhtunkhwa is not a good decsion, I will be open to change my views as a result of arguments and counter arguments.
Reference:
1. Dawn editorial: Beyond Kalabagh
2. Kalabagh Dam Political, Environmental & Humanitarian Disaster in Pakistan by Ayaz Latif Palijo
3. Infeasibility of Kalabagh Dam at www.dawn.com
It is the right of the people of the province to change the Provinces name to whatever they want. I am a Punjabi and have no concerns at all about whatever the name is. As long as it represents the wishes of the people of that province.
I don’t have any issue regarding the name of a piece of land when its dwellers want it to be changed to whatever.
However, I fail to appreciate these dwellers when they let a bunch of failed politicians win an election majorly based on this decision.
It shows how easy it is for our crooked politicians to sway election result by having the timid public chanting slogans and dieing for non-issues.
99% of Pakistani have no idea where and how Kalabagh will be built? what are the geological and geographical requirements of building a large Dam? What will be the replacements of Kalabagh, and if they are themselves feasible or not? What are we going to do if Terbella and Mangla (or either one of them even) silts to the point of non-functionality? Why a Dam in Sindh is not feasible at all as a replacement of Kalabagh? Why does the World Bank refrain to give loans to developing countries for Hydroelectric production (conspiracy theory: coz they want us to buy energy from International sources and remain dependent)
And yet we have deadly street protests and swinging poll results based on these issues? I mean When I see a Pan Eating plumber on the streets of Karachi saying “Kalabagh Dam Nahi Banna Chahheye Kyon Key Altaf Bhai nay kaha hai ke yeh theek nahi hai!!!!!!!” it freaking makes me sick and wanting to push all the bewakooof and GHAREEB AWAM into either Afghnistan or Indian Ocean!
I am still a fan and strong supporter of Mushrraf, who rightly says that we, as a nation, are not ready and do not deserve Democracy at all.
What I totally hate to see, is that a bunch of stampeding crowd full of ignorant, stupids deciding for the country’s future and its policies.
What we need is a stern dictator, with honest intentions. China, Singapore, UAE, present day Russia, Oman (after 1970s) are beacons of non democratic Developed (and Sane) countries, so why cant we be the same?
I think Dam are vital to country’s economy , not only they serve as water reservoir but also control flooding, and a source for hydro-power. I haven’t read much about issue until recently.I have read different opinions whether we should build it or not. The most interesting was from sindh side , that
“jab sarhad aur punjab ,pani se bijli nikal leinge tu sindh mein us pani se fasal kese ugey gi”
:)
i don’t remember the source.
but apart from it , as of now , I think only sind’s stance about the construction is justified technically. (NWFP asked about the royalties and Punjab agreed to include those areas into NWFP ). Sind’ concern is about the low share of water that it will get after the dam construction. More importantly , some one quoted Ayaz Amir on wikipedia, that the source of dispute is lack of trust towards punjab. Water theft has been a constant observation in our history, and building of exsiting dam has weakened the mighty indus river to barren lands.
International law gives more rights to the tailenders of a river.
Anyways, these studies should be done before the construction of dams, to avoid wastage of national funds, but if they have done it, and has already invested an enormous amount, then I think we should push it towards the finishing mark and start thinking about finding a workaround for the resulting situation.
“One should ask PML(Q) what did they do about the project in the past 6 years?”
This is a real contentious issue. Those who are in favor are worried not to stir nationalistic emotions. Those who are against it have neither the answer nor the vision to provide the alternative. And we are stuck with, well, nothingness.
I would rather that we break all the provinces in smaller administrative entities so that these areas gets good governance for a change. All the provinces are just too big with too many problems to be dealt by a single governing body.
Provinces should not mean anything more than administrative area. We should not associate ourselves with a particular region. Look at India, they have broken up their side of Punjab in different states. We should follow their good examples instead of their stupid movies.
I always thought how is it possible that a project concieved in 50s remained viable. It is good for politics cuz it stir a debate as a result whatever going on becomes insignificant. Nothing will change in this country whether ruled by military dictators or so called democates.