Remembering a Reformer: Sir Syed Ahmed Khan

Posted on October 17, 2008
Filed Under >Saad Qaisar, Education, History, People
269 Comments
Total Views: 111003

Saad Qaisar

Today (October 17, 2008) marks the 191st birthday of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan (1817-1898).

In the history of Indian Sub-Continent, the role Syed Sahib played for Muslims of India deserves golden words. Sir Syed was the most influential leader and social reformer of his time. He felt that the socio-economic future of Muslims was threatened by their orthodox aversions to modern science and technology. He made significant contributions in this regard that had long term implications for the Muslims of India that eventually lead to creation of state of Pakistan.

Either it be his advocacy for Urdu to be recognized by British empire as second language of India & a symbol of Muslim heritage or establishment of a ‘Muslim Cambridge’ in form of MAO college at Aligarh, he is seen as a most vocal figure for the rights of Indian Muslims in the second half of 19th century under British Raj. At Aligarh, Sir Syed formed Scientific Society of Aligarh, the first scientific society of its kind in India that assembled Muslim scholars from across India, held annual conferences, disbursed funds for educational causes and regularly published a journal on scientific subjects in English & Urdu.

His views, at times, challenged orthodox clergy who appeared averse to his message of ‘change’.

Today, as we find our nation amidst divergent schools of thought, when one segment of society is bent towards ultra-liberalism & appear to blindly follow western civilization, more of its bad than good and on other end, there are those who are hell bent to stick to age-old orthodox philosophy, do we await another Syed Sahib that would channelize our energies to the middle path. Or can we revive spirit of Syed Sahib’s life as a guideline in all the issues that confront us as a nation? Men like Syed Sahib are born once in decades, or perhaps, centuries! Are we ready to wait centuries for that to happen or reformulate our thought in-line with modern demands, choice is ours!

As Iqbal rightly put it:

aaen-e-nau say darna, tarz-e Kuhan pe aRna
manzil ye hi katthan hai, qaumoN kee zindagi meiN

‘To be afraid of modern ways, to get stuck on age old patterns, is the biggest hurdle in the life of Nations’.

Photo Credits: Khurram Ali Shafique and Wikipedia.com

269 responses to “Remembering a Reformer: Sir Syed Ahmed Khan”

  1. D_a_n says:

    @ Rashad…

    Your Statement in your last comment:

    ‘When I see clean shaved

  2. ylh says:

    Rashad,

    Syed ataullah shah bukhari, allama mashriqi. Majlis e Ahrar, Maulana Maududi …none of them were “secular left”.

    Meanwhile the Communist Party of India supported Jinnah completely and wholeheartedly.

    Look for “communists and making of Pakistan” …

    And I am not even a commie sympathizer.

  3. Rashad says:

    Lutuf , Jinnah was not ridiculed by Muslim clergy only he was also ridiculed by secular left of that time who called him a person who has no knowledge about Islam so in reality Jinnah was abused by fascists of both wings.

    Referring Ahsan eslahi ,Ghamidi and then saying them scholars is quite funny. Ahsan Eslahi was the guy who ridiculed Surah Feel. Ghamidi and Modudi don’t sound different than Ahsan Eslahi since both have written blasphemous words about Islam. Offcourse Ahmad Khan ws the guy who didn’t believe in Jinns who are also creature of Allah and mentioned in Quran.

    “Abu Jahal was not killed in Badar. He is alive, well and kicking ass in Pakistan.”

    Very well said my friend. When I see clean shaved “progressive Muslims” talking about Islam by ridiculing its basic like Jihad, Women rights then I am forced to think what you mentioned in a single statement.

  4. YLH says:

    Omar,

    That was his finest achievement…. even those secular Muslims from the Indian nationalist camp like Jinnah etc who had not been part of the Aligarh brand and had chosen to join the Congress as Indian nationalists ultimately came to the same conclusion as Sir Syed….

    He represented a modernist and secular consciousness in what was a religio-cultural community… he realized that in a scenario dominated by the Hindu majority, the Muslim minority would be held hostage by Mullahs …

    Unfortunately the revival of 1970s and 1980s all over the Muslim world has squandered many of the advantages that Sir Syed’s thinking brought.

  5. Liaquat says:

    I think Syed Ahmad Khan and his times repreented the same struggles that we are going through now. The struggles of modernity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*