Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat

Posted on March 19, 2009
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice, People, Politics
329 Comments
Total Views: 107958

Adil Najam

As the politics of intrigue and rumor heats up, even more, in Pakistan and after the recent dramatic political events, the news of Pakistan’s most important existential battle – against the extremism of the Taliban and their ilk – seems to have slid off the front pages.

Yet, a news item in The News reminds us that the murderous militants are now setting their eyes towards District Dir, after gaining control of Swat. One got a better glimpse into the mind of one of the key players in the Swat saga, Sufi Mohammed, in an interview given to Daily Times’ Peshawar Bureau Chief Iqbal Khattak. Speaking in Mingora, the 74 year-old father-in-law of militant leader Fazlulah gives many important glimpses into his own thinking and priorities.

Here is the interview published in Daily Times:

You said in a 2005 interview with us that what Al Qaeda and the Taliban are doing in Pakistan is haram. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last sixteen months also haram?
Sufi Muhammad: Yes, I said that about Al Qaeda, but not about the Taliban. Let me say…that debate on past happenings is disallowed in Islam. A hadith sharif says, what has happened in the past should not be discussed.

Your Ad Here
But how can we proceed without debating the past?
The hadith sharif says a Muslim should not discuss past happenings because he may not remember all the [details] and, therefore, he may…sin by not speaking the truth.

A majority of Swat residents do not think the peace deal recently signed between the TNSM and the NWFP government will last long.
God Almighty does everything; he builds and destroys countries.

Residents also doubt whether peace is possible in the presence of armed Taliban.
Everyone keeps weapons. People in Peshawar have weapons with them.

You support keeping weapons?
Yes, you can keep weapons with you.

Did you ask Fazlullah to surrender weapons after the sharia law deal?
Keeping weapons is halal in Islam.

President Zardari said recently that force would be used if the Taliban do not surrender weapons in Swat.
His statement is childish…immature.

With sharia law in Swat, there will be a complete ban on music and girls’ education, and people will be forced to grow beards?
There are five subjects — judiciary, politics, economics, education and the executive. The judicial subject will be with us, the rest is beyond our control.

The Taliban are kidnapping government officials and killing soldiers, yet you still hold the army responsible for ceasefire violations.
Kidnapping cases are taking place all over the world. The military violated the ceasefire.

The military says some of its soldiers were shot dead while bringing water.
No. This is not the case. The soldiers were not killed near any stream.

Are soldiers moving freely in Swat after the peace deal?
No. The military cannot move freely unless peace is restored.

After peace is restored, will the army leave Swat?
This is Pakistan’s army and Swat is within Pakistan’s borders. I will have no objection if a military cantonment is established here.

Locals say innocent people have been killed. Will the aggrieved families be able to get justice?
I have told you already: we will not discuss what has happened in the past. Sharia law does not allow this.

If a court summons a key Taliban commander, will he appear before the court?
If Caliph Umar (RA) can appear before a court, then why can’t others?

So Fazlullah will also appear in court if summoned?
If he does not… he will be acting against the sharia law.

What you did in Malakand in the 1990s and then in Afghanistan in 2001 you called ‘jihad’. Are Fazlullah’s activities over the last 16 months in Swat also jihad?
I do not want to speak on this.

What are Fazlullah’s plans after the peace deal?
He will support imposition of sharia law.

You have termed democracy ‘infidelity’. But Maulana Sami-ul Haq, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Qazi Hussain Ahmad are taking part in the democratic process.
Democracy is not permissible in sharia law. I will not name [these leaders] but they are taking part in infidelity. I will not offer prayers if one of [these leaders] is leading those prayers.

Do you intend to export sharia law to other parts of Pakistan?
If people help me, I will. Otherwise, no.

329 responses to “Interview: Sufi Mohammad of TNSM, Swat”

  1. Aamir Ali says:

    @Drone

    Swat is no longer practically speaking part of Pakistan, so Sufi Mohammed, Fazlullah and Nek Mohammed all succeeded in their murderous and separatist agendas.

    The problem isn’t America, its our internal terrorists and those who are blind to our internal terrorists, like you.

    @Sameer
    Maybe India should educate its citizens better about its neighborhood so that you don’t have to be so surprised about facts of life.

  2. Till the 'Drone' Doth Us Part says:

    I do not agree with most of what Sufi Mohammed says but I think Sufi Mohammed is one of the reasons the insurgency in Swat did not become a separatist movement. Since the martyrdom of Nek Muhammad in 2004 it has been the tradition of the American moles of the establishment to use peace-making only to buy time until America has assassinated the other party to the peace pact. This should stop. Anyone who has the slightest regard for Pakistan should know that if Sufi Mohammed is harmed, the generation-next Taliban of Maulana Fazlullah will have no hesitation in joining hands with the enemy. That India has infiltrated the Taliban ranks is well-known given the number of uncircumcised ‘Taliban’ corpses found after battles.

    America makes no secret of its desire to dismember Pakistan. The Balochistan separatist movement which was little-known apart from the “governments in exile” in Israel and UK and the occasional bombings in Kohlu and even the Baltistan secessionists are being supported championed as the new causes of freedom, liberation, democracy, whatever else US/UK Bull crap you want to call excuses for attacking Muslim countries. Liberating those parts of Pakistan is as high on the Zionist agenda as Darfur, Kurdistan etc.

    Is it not a coincidence therefore that John Solecki the American head of the UNHCR remains kidnapped, faces execution deadlines unless the Pakistan government meets the demands of the kidnappers. And then when the deadline passes without Mr Solecki being beheaded, the kidnappers take instructions from London and Washington and renew the deadlines? Has Mr Solecki actually been kidnapped? Or has he been given paid leave from his day-time CIA job?
    This mock ‘kidnapping’ should be investigated, never mind if John Solecki lives or dies as should the rest of the facts behind the Baloch separatist by failed feudal leaders who tried the same with the help of the Soviets in the ’70’s.

    And now, enters the Obama administration, keen to bomb Balochistan with drones. We all know now why Mr Solecki is being kept alive despite the passage of numerous deadlines…

  3. Sameer says:

    I am impressed with the comments written by Pakistanis. I used to take all pakis as jihadis or jahils or living in a fool’s land. You guys are humans too and like to live a peaceful life for the betterment of your families and the society as a whole. If you educate your fellow beings in a broader platform that will help your neighbour and rest of the world.

  4. Mercede75 says:

    It is the result of cultivating a “Jihadi” culture for so many years. If Zia ul Haq were alive he would have been helpless the same way as our recent governments.

    About “Islam does not allow remembering the past”:
    1) In the Ahad war, second war between Islam and Kufr, Hamza, the uncle of prophet Muhammad was badly injured. Hinda, Abu Sufiyan

  5. fatima says:

    wow
    heard a new thing
    things happened in the past should not be discussed

    i broke a law and it happened in the past so i shouldnt be punished for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*