Stop Issuing Weapon Licenses, Mr. Prime Minister

Posted on January 14, 2010
Filed Under >Adil Najam, Law & Justice
27 Comments
Total Views: 21591

Adil Najam

Even as violence of all forms spirals all over the country and even as, in the wake of the recent violence in there, politicians from all parties call for Karachi to be declared a “weapons free” zone (rightly!), it turns out that politicians and parliamentarians from all parties are busy distributing licenses for all forms of prohibited weapons as if these were kids candy.

Equating social prestige with possession of weapons – especially the most lethal, more prohibited, and sometimes outright illegal ones – has always been an absurd idea, but it is absolutely indefensible under the current conditions of rampant and widespread violence.

Yet, giving licenses for prohibited – or difficult to possess – weapons has always been a cheap and easy ‘give away’ for politicians and bureaucrats. In a society where all politics is transactional, a license for a prohibited weapon is an “easy ask” and an “easy giveaway.” Those receiving the “favor” feel privileged and can show off their importance because they are now demonstrably “above the law.” Those doling out the “favor” can justify to themselves that one more weapon in a society so weaponized already will make scant difference.

Indeed, one more weapon might not make a difference; but tens of thousands certainly do. And that is exactly what parliamentarians have been doling out, often with the direct approval of the Prime Minister. If we are at all sincere in stopping the violence, not just in Karachi but all over the country, then this culture of violence and the glorification of violence and of the tools of violence must stop. Of course, it will not stop just because the Prime Minister will say so. But the Prime Minister must set the example, and must do so visibly and honestly. He can do so, at the very least, by stopping the issuance of all licenses for all prohibited weapons. For everyone. Altogether. They are, after all, prohibited weapons!

To give context to all of the above, here is what The News reports:

Since the last week of March 2008, more than 38,800 people have been issued licences of prohibited weapons such as Kalashnikov, MP5, G3 and Uzi, mostly on direct orders of the prime minister and minister of state for interior. Most alarmingly, these licences were issued without any police verification or an official check on the background of the applicants, according to an investigation by this correspondent. A whopping 100,000 licences of non-prohibited bore weapons, such as revolvers and pistols, were also issued without any police verification whatsoever during the same 21-month period.

This issue gets directly linked to parliamentarians and the Prime Minister because the issuance of such licenses is still seen as a parliamentary “perk.” The same report from The News continues:

There is no formal or official procedure in the country for a common Pakistani to properly apply for a prohibited bore weapon license other than finding a member of the National Assembly or the Senate having direct connections with the prime minister or minister of state for interior for the approval of license, hence prohibited bore licenses are a precious commodity and arms dealers charge a premium of up to Rs 200,000 for such a license.

Sources in arms dealers’ community estimate liberal issuance of prohibited and non-prohibited weapons licences by the government since April 2008 has generated Rs 20 billion business for weapons dealers in sale of automatic, semi-automatic weapons in addition to massive earnings in selling the prohibited and non-prohibited licences of weapons. The situation also raised serious questions about the exact source of weapon supplies to arms dealers. Massive monetary attraction, besides other reasons, may have contributed to immense pressure on Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani from parliamentarians to favour them with his special powers to issue licences for all sorts of weapons.

As parliamentarians pressed the prime minister for more and more licences, [the Prime Minister] introduced an unprecedented quota of weapons licences in September last year by allowing 25 licences per year of prohibited weapons and 20 licences per month of non-prohibited weapons for each member of the National Assembly and the Senate. He extended the favour to MPAs also by allotting them five prohibited weapons licenses per year. Since March 2008 till June 2009, the prime minister ordered issuance of 22,541 licences of prohibited weapons, mostly making orders on plain papers with certain names scribbled on them presented to him by various MNAs and senators.

In recent months,the issue of such licenses took an unsurprising turn for the worse. Again, The News reports:

In two months after assuming the office of minister of state for interior in April 2009, Tasnim Ahmed Qureshi issued a record 5,986 licences of prohibited weapons, including more than 100 licences that ended up at the Inter Risk (Pvt) Ltd, the security company contracted by the United States Embassy in Pakistan. Inter Risk owners are now facing prosecution for possessing a large cache of illegal weapons. Qadir Nawaz, the personal secretary of the minister of state for interior, was arrested in the case, while the issuance of about 6,000 prohibited weapons licences in just two months on the direct order of the minister of state is still being probed by the relevant agencies. This incident caused uproar in the government security services about the scale of corruption and security risks in weapons license system. The prime minister, though rejected allegations of ministerial level involvement in the weapons scam, announced a ban on issuance of licences in June last year.

The News report ends by quoting an unnamed interior ministry official: “If parliament believes in accountability, justice and fair play, it should allow a neutral and thorough probe into the prohibited weapons license case and examine who were those 39,000 people whose names were recommended by various senators and MNAs for Kalashnikovs and Uzis licences as well as those 100,000-plus people who received licences for pistols and revolvers.”

The quote, or the interior ministry official, may or may not be a real one, but the sentiment in the quote is right on!

So, Mr. Prime Minister, please stop issuing these licenses.

27 responses to “Stop Issuing Weapon Licenses, Mr. Prime Minister”

  1. HarOON says:

    I am sorry but self-styled know-alls like Rashid Ali are only good at finding faults with everyone else while suggesting nothing constructive themselves. If only this disease of thinking of ones own self as too smart for the “rest of them” could be cured. Idealistic, maybe. But less erroneous than the arrogance of know-all commenters!

  2. Rashid Hasan says:

    Our uncanny ability to demand for utopian setups in our society rather than practical ones is at play here again. More guns in citizens hands is not a problem. It is kind of a solution albeit a distasteful one.

    When government (which is “us” collectively deciding to give up some of our rights as a price to live peacefully in a society and enrolling and paying (through taxation) some members to disburse that duty of maintaining law and order i.e., saving us from the evil of each other) is busy/confused with various demands of “welfare state” and police and courts are almost ridiculously insufficient, what choice we have other than to allow common citizen to own guns and defend him/herself.

    Our philosopher poet and other intellectuals shower accolades on the free spirit of the tribal area people. They are even fighting right now for what they deem right (again no matter how distasteful that appears to me) on what basis, may I ask? Guns and gun ownership. They live in anarchy. They do not believe in Government. They do not pay any taxes and recognoze no authority except volutary jirga that they have.

    On the other hand, we living in cities have agreed to be castrated of our right to defend ourselves in the favor of having a government ensuring that our fundamental and most basic right of life and property will be defended by an impartial body for which we are paying too. This is the civilized way. This was the solution humanity find as a cure for the “poor, nasty, brutish and short” conditions of life of the man in nature.

    But alas “who will guard the guards” coupled with over burderned expectations from the Government has rendered it impotent to disburse the first and foremost duty of hers. Maintain law and order and secure life and property of citizens.

    There are demands for safe drinking water for everyone, food and shelter for everyone, education for everyone (the ratio between schools and police stations is ridiculously high in Pakistan and still every bleeding heart liberal keeps talkiing about opening more schools and not a peep for more police), health care for everyone, lights at every religious event, etc. etc. etc.

    We ask Government to do so much that is failing at doing anything at all. Plus our tax collection and understanding of civic responsiblity is pathetic as well.

    Every insititution related to law and order is systematically ridiculed and short changed.

    Two common solutions touted for this malaise are equally ridiculous. 1: Ah! if everyone is educated and above poverty level, there will be no problems 2: Only if only everyone becomes a true muslim, there will be no problem.

    I do not have the desire to expose the idiocy of the above.

    Anyway, the point is, when we do not have police to protect my life and property, let me do it myself. Every now and then, riots happen. Every now and then army moves over and rule us. Based on what!!! Guns and that is it. They have it and you do not.

    I will write more later.

  3. GunTup Khan says:

    its not the guns who kills people, its the husbands who come early :)

  4. Ghazal says:

    That is the need of hour and if they do want to issue those licenses they first issue it to the common people, who are at the mercy of terrorists, robbers, and local political thugs.

  5. Ghazal says:

    And if they do want to issue those licenses they first issue it to the common people, who are at the mercy of terrorists, robbers, and local political thugs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*